DC Controls





Thanks
He may have had to shut down to catch up. he does this by himself and has a real day job too I think. He may have to get all his orders finished before he begins taking new ones. Keep trying that website every few weeks or so.
but not to say his controllers may have worked fine....I know of a guy who has one wired MY way, direct off the alternator, but have not asked how the performance is....
I use a nice heavy 30 amp relay off the alt direct to the Dual Spals...and have over with it....





Thanks in advance,
Lurkin
there are various ways to controll fan trigger temps....
now to get cute....you know on kitchen ovens...there is a capillary tube and a controll ****... find a junkyard stove with a contoller, carefully tear it out (or spend 50 bux for a new one) and adjust the screw to change the temps it turns on/off at.....
insert the probe in the coolent under a hose clamp with rtv and a secure clamp...let it set up/cure before system pressures are applied....
monitor with a temp probe of some sore, adjust the screw and the ****/shaft to the required settings.....
BTDT...it works....another form of junkyard engineering....
eh what????





http://store.summitracing.com/partde...part=FLX-33054
Lurkin
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...part=FLX-33054
Lurkin
the Dual spals have much less inertia to turn over the blade than that 16 inch Lincoln fan.....so the current drains on speed up are much less over shorter time span.....
assuming of course the total suck/blow is the same....airflow....
I don't know this for sure but I was told the standard GM big can starters only had a spike of about 30 amps, and the newer mini starters had around a 20 amp spike.
There was a guy that tested a MarkVIII fan and found it have a 104 amp spike, with extended 64 amp draw, and then a constant of around 30.
That's a big spike.
There was a guy that tested a MarkVIII fan and found it have a 104 amp spike, with extended 64 amp draw, and then a constant of around 30.
That's a big spike.
DB, obviously you are talking of two differant spikes.....
one is the inductive kickback spike, that is totally differant than the start surge, which is not really a 'spike' at all, except to current drain....
as such it can NOT hurt the electrical system.....
the starter used to typically draw up to 200 amps to start the car, hense the older super heavy starter cables....it was the starter motor directly turning on the Bendix gear....engaging the fly.....so the start currents were extremely high to get that engine flipping, then the drain was less....now when the starter motor was allowed to stop when engine fired, it's draw was much less....and so the inductive reverse spike from magnetic field collapse is much less.....depending on the decay it would be worth a few amps....but certainly higher than any known auto fan motor.....not betting on a Kenworth with electric fans....
on the initail start of a 16 inch fan, I don't doubt it could maybe reach 100 amps for maybe 100 ms or so.... but once that armature starts spinning, that current draws much less....which is why my comment above....
just for sake of discussion, lets assume the spals move air same as the Lincoln fan.....
two 11" fan blades will take much less current to torque up to speed....
less moment of intertia....surely there are two of them, but the motors must have to be smaller to be equal enough in total running airflow...so the drain is less, and speed up is greater.....which to my reasoning is less drain for shorter time on the electricals....
not that it matters much....
one is the inductive kickback spike, that is totally differant than the start surge, which is not really a 'spike' at all, except to current drain....
as such it can NOT hurt the electrical system.....
the starter used to typically draw up to 200 amps to start the car, hense the older super heavy starter cables....it was the starter motor directly turning on the Bendix gear....engaging the fly.....so the start currents were extremely high to get that engine flipping, then the drain was less....now when the starter motor was allowed to stop when engine fired, it's draw was much less....and so the inductive reverse spike from magnetic field collapse is much less.....depending on the decay it would be worth a few amps....but certainly higher than any known auto fan motor.....not betting on a Kenworth with electric fans....
on the initail start of a 16 inch fan, I don't doubt it could maybe reach 100 amps for maybe 100 ms or so.... but once that armature starts spinning, that current draws much less....which is why my comment above....
just for sake of discussion, lets assume the spals move air same as the Lincoln fan.....
two 11" fan blades will take much less current to torque up to speed....
less moment of intertia....surely there are two of them, but the motors must have to be smaller to be equal enough in total running airflow...so the drain is less, and speed up is greater.....which to my reasoning is less drain for shorter time on the electricals....
not that it matters much....
A battery is a natural surge suppressor. This DC guy has blown this WAY out of proportion.
course if one wants perfect world it's possible to supress the spikes, but so what?? it's only good for metal detectors/TVs/maybe some other devices.......another topic entirely...
What Detroit does isn't always the best answer, anyway. Most everyone on this board can name a few examples of stupid engineering they've seen in various automobiles.
What Detroit does isn't always the best answer, anyway. Most everyone on this board can name a few examples of stupid engineering they've seen in various automobiles.
Should have seen the insulted look on that ME's face when I referred to it as Stupid Assed Engineering once, years ago.....it was precious.....
he and I were fairly good friends even after that comment....












