When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
79 L82 w/ 80k miles, i plan on installing some umbrella seals on the valves stems on the car.(burning a little oil on start up), would it be wise to replace the valve springs and locks with new oem ones or just reinstall the old ones. i didnt know if it would cause any problems with the camshaft, i am also replacing the pushrods and oem rocker arms with roller tip rockers. just need some thoughts. thanks.
If not mistaken, the new rocker arms will allow for more lift. I'd check if the current spring can handle that. On the other hand, if you are making such an investment and taking them off anyway: new springs aren't really that expensive...
New springs are cheap BUT if the old ones were still within specs you might consider reusing them. You have put the current set on a long term QC test and they have passed. New springs are going to be fine 9 times out of 10 but why roll the dice?
No real "right" answer here but maybe this helps in some way.
Respectfully, In this case I disagree on reusing old springs ... nearly 30 years old & 80Kmiles ... lotsa cycle time ... they may be fine, maybe not. Under those conditions and since they're gonna be loose anyway, I'd fit new springs. BTW ... I'm not a fan of rollertips ... & IMHO, unless you're changing rockerarm ratio from stock 1.5:1 ... simply having rollertips ain't worth fooling with anyway. An OE or better quality set of replacement VSprings can be had for about $25 - $30 / 16. I'd go with an OE replacement or equivalent spring ... nothing more.
-edit-Pretty sure stock OE replacement spring for '79 from sealed power is P/N VS-677 ... while a stronger "Z-28 spring" is VS-739R .
Last edited by jackson; Oct 26, 2007 at 05:16 PM.
Reason: moinfo
i was looking at the 1.52 ratio ones, but whats the difference in self aligniing and non self aligning rocker arms. thanks for the info.
Are those 1.52:1 from "Competition Cams"??? ... if so, their quality is OK ... I'd never recommend offshore stuff in valvetrain. You neither need nor want self-aligning for '79 heads ...
-edit- ... unless there is a lotta rocker arm side play at valve tip ... you wouldn't want roller to run off the tip of valve ... guideplates too much trouble ... so if you have alotta sideplay then self-aligning may be correct for you.
whats the difference in self aligning and non self aligning rocker arms.
There are a few different types but this pic (Comp Cams Pro Magnum Roller Rocker) is a true self aligning rocker. It has a trunnion shaft through the center so the rocker cant possibly slide side to side on the valve stem.
And then theres the standard Roller tip rocker which can cause side loading problems if the pushrod holes in the head casting are not exactly in line with the valve stem tips.
I had this problem with a set of RHS heads and the Comp Cams non aligning roller tips which you can see in the last picture.
Comp Cams Roller tip
RHS heads geometry problem with Comp Cams roller tips.
Look at the upside down rocker at page bottom right ... it's circled in red.
See the rails or nubs that are on either side of the tip-roller? That's a self-aligning rocker arm. Those rails/nubs are what distinguishes a self aligning rocker from non-self aligning ... nothing else ... has nothing to do with trunnion. BTW ... stock OE stamped shoe "NON roller self-aligning is similar ... has rails/nubs extending on either side of sliding surface ... captures valve tip & centers it. Comp also has same thing in rollertip but without roller trunnion.
See the rails or nubs that are on either side of the tip-roller? That's a self-aligning rocker arm. Those rails/nubs are what distinguishes a self aligning rocker from non-self aligning ... nothing else ... has nothing to do with trunnion.
Jack, are you saying that the trunnion is just there for smoother movement?
Now that I look at it I guess I was wrong about trunnion keeping it aligned.
I have also seen rockers with the flat washer type guides on both sides of the roller that keep them on the valve stem.
I think the most important issue with self aligning rollers is having the proper clearance in the pushrod holes
Jack, are you saying that the trunnion is just there for smoother movement?
Now that I look at it I guess I was wrong about trunnion keeping it aligned.
I have also seen rockers with the flat washer type guides on both sides of the roller that keep them on the valve stem.
I think the most important issue with self aligning rollers is having the proper clearance in the pushrod holes
HiYa Bob!
Trunnion (point at which rocker articululates up-down at rocker stud) is a ball&fulcrum on our OE C3 ... and on magnum rockers. But it's a needle bearing on late LS motors (LS still has a sliding non-roller tip) and on PRO magnum rockers. Yep, comp has Aluminum rockers with washers on either side of tip-roller to self align ... me thinks the washer type self align is a poor design. There's alot more friction reduction found in rollerizing the trunnion than in tip (tip negligible) ... look at all GM LS motors ... including hi-po LS7 ... roller trunnion w/ NON roller tip. I've seen evidence roller tip simply slides across valve tip and not rolling across.
There's alotta variation amongst heads' pr holes ... dang near impossible for anyone to say with absolute certainty exactly what's best without having the particular head & valvetrain in front of them.