C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Blower vs. Higher Compression/ Nitrous

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 05:21 PM
  #21  
Little Mouse's Avatar
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by torqvette
Tony Mammo from AFR just called me and said that I would be losing 60-70 hp with the cam that I have now if I run boost.
Call Weiand that makes both mini blower kits and 6/71 on up blower
kits ask them questions on power with lower compression
more boost, or higher compression with small amounts of boost.

Then call comp, crane or whatever brand cam you like ask them about
differences in power with a wide LSA or why they recomend a
wide LSA with boosted engines.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 05:33 PM
  #22  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

Just got off the phone with Weiand tech support. I asked him how much more power I'd be making with 4lbs of boost (which is what their website reccommends for 9.5:1 compression on pump gas). He told me that I'd be making only 25-35 more hp!!! Does this sound accurate to you guys?!

On the plus side he said that my cam wasn't bad for boost, and my 110 LSA might actually help the high compression/ detonation problem a bit.

Comp told me that my cam wasn't all that bad for boost, I will have to compensate slightly with a larger pulley, but it shouldn't be that big of a deal according to Comp.

Just got off the phone with Snow Performance, he told me that I should go with their stage 2 methanol injection kit, and with that I should be able to double my boost (8lbs). So it looks like if I do this, I will be running methanol injection for sure. So now that I have a better grip on my options, here's the determining factor: how much more hp will my 400+hp aluminum headed 383 make with 8lbs of boost? If it's not much more than 100hp, it seems to me that nitrous would be a better alternative.

Last edited by enkeivette; Nov 9, 2007 at 06:01 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 06:40 PM
  #23  
Little Mouse's Avatar
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by torqvette
Just got off the phone with Weiand tech support. I asked him how much more power I'd be making with 4lbs of boost (which is what their website reccommends for 9.5:1 compression on pump gas). He told me that I'd be making only 25-35 more hp!!! Does this sound accurate to you guys?!

On the plus side he said that my cam wasn't bad for boost, and my 110 LSA might actually help the high compression/ detonation problem a bit.

Comp told me that my cam wasn't all that bad for boost, I will have to compensate slightly with a larger pulley, but it shouldn't be that big of a deal according to Comp. got off the phone with Snow Performance, he told me that I should go with their stage 2 methanol injection kit, and with that I should be able to double my boost (8lbs). So it looks like if I do this, I will be running methanol injection for sure. So now that I have a better grip on my options, here's the determining factor: how much more hp will my 400+hp aluminum headed 383 make with 8lbs of boost? If it's not much more than 100hp, it seems to me that nitrous would be a better alternative.
Lets say weiand is not correct for argument sake the 4 pounds
would give you say 70/75 horsepower, not much power for the
expense of a blower. Nitrous with the setup of comp. you now
have is the best alternative. Weiand man may have just gave an honest
answer even though he knew 25/35 horsepower was not going to convince
you to buy his product. I think a mini blower would have to be turned
pretty fast to get to 8 pounds of boost on a 383, thats why b & M
made a 250 size mini blower for large small blocks, I suspect when
b & M was bought out, Weiand did not bother with keeping the 250
most people with large small blocks probably just opted to buy a 6/71.

Last edited by Little Mouse; Nov 9, 2007 at 06:55 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 07:13 PM
  #24  
guitarcrazy02's Avatar
guitarcrazy02
Drifting
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 2
From: North Royaton Ohio
Default

I've been doing a lot of reading up on superchargers lately. Any reason you haven't considered a centrifugal supercharger? Procharger's got some pretty nice setups claiming over 50%-60% gain.

I'd look into a centrifugal supercharger with an intercooler. It'll allow you to run much more psi, because what causes detonation isn't the increased boost, but the heat that comes with it. With a roots style you have no cooling, and therefore are limited by detonation, which then requires you to run a different fuel, retard timing, or both. Run an intercooler and you can run more boost, and it will be delivered into the engine more efficiently.

Plus, you never have to "fill up" a supercharger like Nitrous. 1 time cost sounds better to me.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 07:33 PM
  #25  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

Well I just played around on desktop dyno for a bit. Don't bother looking past the 6,000 rpm figures, it's not realistic.

I input my exact cam specs and all of the flow numbers at varying lifts for my cylinder heads, so this is pretty accurate.

Here is my engine with the Victor Jr. 436hp @ 6,000rpm



Here is my engine with the Weiand 177 (8lbs of boost) 560hp @ 6,000rpm (Keep in mind that to run 8lbs I would need methanol injection) At only 4lbs of boost I would make 484hp @ 6,000rpm



Little Mouse I think you're right. Now I'm leaning back over towards nitrous, not even sure that the compression increase will be worth it. With a one point increase in compression according to desktop dyno I'd be at 454hp @ 6,000rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 07:42 PM
  #26  
Little Mouse's Avatar
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by torqvette
Well I just played around on desktop dyno for a bit. Don't bother looking past the 6,000 rpm figures, it's not realistic.

I input my exact cam specs and all of the flow numbers at varying lifts for my cylinder heads, so this is pretty accurate.

Here is my engine with the Victor Jr. 436hp @ 6,000rpm



Here is my engine with the Weiand 177 (8lbs of boost) 560hp @ 6,000rpm (Keep in mind that to run 8lbs I would need methanol injection) At only 4lbs of boost I would make 484hp @ 6,000rpm



Little Mouse I think you're right. Now I'm leaning back over towards nitrous, not even sure that the compression increase will be worth it. With a one point increase in compression according to desktop dyno I'd be at 454hp @ 6,000rpm.
Really I'm not trying to get you to go the nitrous rout, I'am trying
to get you to drop compression put the blower on the car the right
way. Everything I have ever read about blowers you want low
comp. and as high a boost as pump gas will allow . Don't go off
half cocked if you really don't like fooling around with nitrous wait
tell you have the funds or time to drop the comp. do the job the right way. Personally with dropped comp I don't think even the 177
weiand is a good choice for a large small block, you have to spin it to fast to get boost out of it. The 6/71 will give you the boost easy and a lot of wow factor a lot of people like. but if your not wanting
to go the 6/71, believe I would look into someting like the procharger
or a turbo over a mini blower. The lag problems turbos had a lot of yrs ago have been worked out and a turbo is free HP off the exhaust it takes no power off the engine to run it.

Last edited by Little Mouse; Nov 9, 2007 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2007 | 08:59 PM
  #27  
yellow 72's Avatar
yellow 72
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,202
Likes: 10
From: cincinnati ohio
St. Jude Donor '09
Default

If you want gobs of torque right off idle, instant throttle response and the ability to haze the tires at will, drop the comp and go with a big blower.
I have somewhere between 8.5 and 9.1. Mild camshaft 230* @ .050. 110 lsa
I spin my blower faster than recomended for my comp. But my rev limiter is at 5000. I don't make make max boost but power is right off idle and there is no need on the street to spin it any faster.
My motor wasn't built for forced induction, but I fell into a good deal on a 6-71.
Hey I have cast pistons for Gods sake
Just some food for thought
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #28  
l88rocket's Avatar
l88rocket
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: Mo
Default

You set up right now, would be good for a nitrous motor. 150- 200 wouldn't be out of the question if the bottem end is there.
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-1

Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-7

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Nov 10, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #29  
63mako's Avatar
63mako
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Default

Originally Posted by l88rocket
You set up right now, would be good for a nitrous motor. 150- 200 wouldn't be out of the question if the bottem end is there.
Put a 200 shot on it. You already have over 400 HP. Should be a great street engine and will probably roast the tires at will and run on regular gas as is. How often do you need the extra 200 HP? There is a plate setup in the C3 parts section Brand new! Might need a different plate. Pretty cheap on E-bay. One issue with the forced induction is longevity. Hard on internals on a street engine.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #30  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

Now I'm thinking about a centrifugal supercharger, I had my mind made up to go with nitrous when Big G sent me this.

That's 10lbs hot and 15lbs intercooled with 9.5:1 on pump gas. That would obviously be worth it.

If I did it, I would like to buy the charger with the bracket/ pulleys and belt for a SBC seperately. Mount the intercooler myself, buy a low profile carb hat, and have my muffler guy run some 3" pipes for me. I can't find anyone who sells the superchargers and brackets by themselves. Any advice?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 05:46 PM
  #31  
Little Mouse's Avatar
Little Mouse
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 95
Default

Originally Posted by torqvette
Now I'm thinking about a centrifugal supercharger, I had my mind made up to go with nitrous when Big G sent me this.

That's 10lbs hot and 15lbs intercooled with 9.5:1 on pump gas. That would obviously be worth it.

If I did it, I would like to buy the charger with the bracket/ pulleys and belt for a SBC seperately. Mount the intercooler myself, buy a low profile carb hat, and have my muffler guy run some 3" pipes for me. I can't find anyone who sells the superchargers and brackets by themselves. Any advice?
Did you get two pms with that pro charger graph ??
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #32  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

Yes I did, thank you though.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 02:15 PM
  #33  
breathial's Avatar
breathial
Pro
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh PA
Default

I'd vote to use a slightly thicker head-gasket, to drop static compression ratio to 9:1. Go with a blower cam (since you're gonna' be most of the way there), and then go with the mini-blower (I saw one on EBay this morning for $800! ).

If you're only making 4-6# of boost, while it may not sound like much, it'll have much better throttle-response than it would be in NA configuration. You should see >600HP, IF you tune it carefully, and are diligent about timing.

The cool thing about a mini-blower is that you'll have increased power throughout the RPM range, and be able to make that power without either refilling bottles, OR spinning the engine up to the sky to get it.

IMHO, the nitrous is the "poor mans' blower," and like any poor substitute, you get what you pay for...

Let us know what you decide.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #34  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

I will not make 600hp with 4lbs, more like 500... if I'm lucky. The tech at Weiand told me I'd see 25-35hp with 4lbs. Not worth cutting a hole in my hood.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #35  
69 N.O.X. RATT's Avatar
69 N.O.X. RATT
Safety Car
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 13
From: Pettis Performance 565 with two stages of Nitrous Supply nitrous 1.082, 4.61 at 155, 7.17 at 192
Default

IMHO, the nitrous is the "poor mans' blower," and like any poor substitute, you get what you pay for...

Let us know what you decide.[/QUOTE]

I just don't get why some guys (who have probably never run nitrous) have such a dislike for it ??

You can have an extra 50-300 hp on tap for around 500-1000 bucks.....plus the cost of an occasional refill, why the visceral hatred ??
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #36  
brngrhd's Avatar
brngrhd
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 1
From: Dane Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by 69 N.O.X. RATT
IMHO, the nitrous is the "poor mans' blower," and like any poor substitute, you get what you pay for...

Let us know what you decide.
I just don't get why some guys (who have probably never run nitrous) have such a dislike for it ??

You can have an extra 50-300 hp on tap for around 500-1000 bucks.....plus the cost of an occasional refill, why the visceral hatred ??


i get that on a turbo forum that i go on i run a stock turbo with nitrous some guys run just a big turbo, i get nitrous is for cheaters, you have to fill a bottle for power, nitrous blows stuff up, ect ect ect. if you know what your doing it is every bit as good as any other power adder for a fraction of the price. you need to know what your doing with any power adder.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 08:49 PM
  #37  
enkeivette's Avatar
enkeivette
Thread Starter
Melting Slicks
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by 69 N.O.X. RATT
I just don't get why some guys (who have probably never run nitrous) have such a dislike for it ??

You can have an extra 50-300 hp on tap for around 500-1000 bucks.....plus the cost of an occasional refill, why the visceral hatred ??
Lots of hear say, and lots of blower guys trying to justify their investment. But in all fairness, nitrous is tougher on... everything. It's instantaneous, as opposed to boost which comes on gradually. Less of a shock to engine and drivetrain components... unless of course you have a progressive nitrous controller that allows it to come in slowly.

Realistically a bottle would last me a long time, as this is not my daily driver. So I'm going to price out the centrifugal supercharger, if I can do it without breaking my bank I will.

Also, 69 N.O.X. RATT where do you fill your bottle(s)? I live close to you and I have no idea where to get it filled. Party City?

As for the centrifugal supercharger, if I do it I will run a hot air kit with plans to add an intercooler with a smaller pulley in the future. I'm leaning towards the Procharger kit as I don't want to have to take off my oil pan to drill for an oil return. Hopefully I can get away with using a low profile carb bonnet to fit under the stock cowl and I plan to cut an oval shaped hole in the corner of my hood to let the top of the supercharger stick out. I may upgrade the float bowls in my Mighty Demon, not sure if I have to and I will probably be upgrading my fuel pump. Other than that, no engine mods. Comp told me that my cam was fine for boost, Procharger told me that I can run 8-10lbs on 91 octane with my compression ratio.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Blower vs. Higher Compression/ Nitrous

Old Nov 13, 2007 | 09:23 PM
  #38  
69 N.O.X. RATT's Avatar
69 N.O.X. RATT
Safety Car
20 Year Member
All Eyes On Me
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,892
Likes: 13
From: Pettis Performance 565 with two stages of Nitrous Supply nitrous 1.082, 4.61 at 155, 7.17 at 192
Default

Originally Posted by torqvette
Lots of hear say, and lots of blower guys trying to justify their investment. But in all fairness, nitrous is tougher on... everything. It's instantaneous, as opposed to boost which comes on gradually. Less of a shock to engine and drivetrain components... unless of course you have a progressive nitrous controller that allows it to come in slowly.

Realistically a bottle would last me a long time, as this is not my daily driver. So I'm going to price out the centrifugal supercharger, if I can do it without breaking my bank I will.

Also, 69 N.O.X. RATT where do you fill your bottle(s)? I live close to you and I have no idea where to get it filled. Party City?

As for the centrifugal supercharger, if I do it I will run a hot air kit with plans to add an intercooler with a smaller pulley in the future. I'm leaning towards the Procharger kit as I don't want to have to take off my oil pan to drill for an oil return. Hopefully I can get away with using a low profile carb bonnet to fit under the stock cowl and I plan to cut an oval shaped hole in the corner of my hood to let the top of the supercharger stick out. I may upgrade the float bowls in my Mighty Demon, not sure if I have to and I will probably be upgrading my fuel pump. Other than that, no engine mods. Comp told me that my cam was fine for boost, Procharger told me that I can run 8-10lbs on 91 octane with my compression ratio.

Cylinder pressure is cylinder pressure.......until you get into BIG hits of nitrous, it is, on average, easier on the motor than most other power adders because you do not need to turn many rpms to make a lot of power. It is rpm that kills motors most of the time. Both properly tuned; a centrifical blower at 7000 rpms making x boost to make 600 hp is much harder on the internals of an engine than a nitrous motor making the same power at 6000 rpms.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 10:19 PM
  #39  
GlockGuy's Avatar
GlockGuy
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: ElP TX
Default

If a WWII fighter can get great HP from a blower (ie. P51) I would prefer that route. Plus a blower (or turbo) does not run out and need refilling, it is always there when you need it.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #40  
brngrhd's Avatar
brngrhd
Racer
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 1
From: Dane Wisconsin
Default

Originally Posted by GlockGuy
If a WWII fighter can get great HP from a blower (ie. P51) I would prefer that route. Plus a blower (or turbo) does not run out and need refilling, it is always there when you need it.
ooo realy

British World War II usage of nitrous oxide injector systems were modifications of Merlin engines carried out by the Heston Aircraft Company for use in certain night fighter variants of the de Havilland Mosquito and PR versions of the Supermarine Spitfire
The power potential of nitrous oxide was thrust into the spotlight during World War II when German Messerschmitt fighters would suddenly accelerate away from pursuing Allied aircraft, sometimes leaving a puff of smoke in their wake. The planes had a hot button that would supply a short burst of nitrous-generated speed. It would take some time for this technology to trickle into the automotive scene.
Nitrous Oxide ( N2O ) was first used as an engine power producer by the German Luftwaffe Air Force before World War II. And later the American Air Corps used Nitrous for helping out the internal combustion engines in fighter planes in benefiting high altitude engine power.
it is all what you like

they all add power how much and when is all in design of any of the systems. how much are you looking for, how much can you use, and how often are you going to use it, are all deciding factors. well that and cost (one reason my vette does not have a turbo on it yet, but till then the bottle will do)

Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE