When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Rethinking the whole thing.
So I am probably going to liquidate half the stuff I have bought over the past couple of years and rethink the whole thing.
Eitherway.
Why do dart heads flow so poorly? Why would you buy dart heads? Is there something I am missing? I like the idea of dart heads as they come in the valve sizes I want (2.05, 1.625) but their flow numbers are horrible when you compare them to AFR, trickflow, RHS, etc.
Cost? The best heads are often the most expensive. When I was doing my research a few years ago, AFR, Canfield and Trickflow came out on top. The Edelbrock Victor Jr heads were pretty damn good too.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Originally Posted by torqvette
Cost? The best heads are often the most expensive. When I was doing my research a few years ago, AFR, Canfield and Trickflow came out on top. The Edelbrock Victor Jr heads were pretty damn good too.
The cost around $500 each bare. Lowest I have found is $449 each bare.
Choice of heads depends on the engines demand for airflow. If you have a small ci engine like 350 or smaller a dart with smaller flow would suffice. And since they overal are pretty cheap, the choice was easy for me.
BTW : I was impressed with the quality.
I have never seen proof of this with a flow sheet, so take it with a grain of salt...... read somewhere they are a very good head to open up. Maybe they offer more porting room? Maybe check with local porters and see what they are getting out of them. Remember that a better flowsheet doesnt always equate to more power.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by Guru_4_hire
So I am probably going to liquidate half the stuff I have bought over the past couple of years and rethink the whole thing.
Eitherway.
Why do dart heads flow so poorly? Why would you buy dart heads? Is there something I am missing? I like the idea of dart heads as they come in the valve sizes I want (2.05, 1.625) but their flow numbers are horrible when you compare them to AFR, trickflow, RHS, etc.
Are they primarily geared to the porting crowd?
I believe Dart publishes real, non fudged flow numbers. They are the real deal and have been doing this for long time.
I believe some of the other companies flow numbers are optimistic at best. Flow numbers sell heads, so take the numbers with a grain of salt.
I am looking at the AFR 227's and I want a guarantee I can put them on a flow bench and they will flow what they are advertised to flow or I get my money back
Here is a link with flow #s: It is outdated though. Some of the newer designs are not included. www.mopar1.us/headflow.html
I do know the darts can be made to flow much better than they come out of the box. Look at I/E Ratios not just intake flow also. For the $ the Brodix IK 200 is pretty good.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Originally Posted by 63mako
Here is a link with flow #s: It is outdated though. Some of the newer designs are not included. www.mopar1.us/headflow.html
I do know the darts can be made to flow much better than they come out of the box. Look at I/E Ratios not just intake flow also. For the $ the Brodix IK 200 is pretty good.
I was going by what Dart advertises. Here is a link to a graphic at Jegs.com
The new Dart aluminum heads are casts from the Platinum design. I had the prior and the new, and the heads guy hardly had to touch them. Got a bowl blend, port match and chamber polish and cc:
The Darts flow 267 & 174 @ .600 The Brodix IK 200 flow 262 and 177 @ .600. Think they are cheaper. Good quality for the price and pretty nice I/E ratio. They are flowing this with 2.02, 1.60valves. Sometimes bigger valves on a 4.030 bore will be somewhat shrouded and won't really flow better. That might explain the lower than expected flow numbers.
Or spend a little more and go AFR 195's. They outflow both with much better I/E ratio and better port velocity.
64cc chambers might work for you for high comp. they do
have 2.02/1.60 valves. but I doubt thats a deal breaker for
power the heads flow air or they don't .03 increase in valve
means little if whats behind the valve is no good.
As an example the old factory heads had 202/160 valves,
but the new vortec head flows much better yet only has
1.94.150 valves.
Careful of IK 200 intake port/gasket size! At least one forum member had problem ... ZZ4 manifold so small it left part of IK 200 opening uncovered. AFAIK , IK 200 requires very large FP 1206 gasket ... and most low rise (vette hood) intakes have a small port & do not match well to IK 200 large openings. IK 180 not a problem ... uses FP 1204. IK 210 uses FP 1205 ... even smaller than IK 200.
From: All humans are vermin in the eyes of Guru VA
Cruise-In IV Veteran
Cruise-In V Veteran
Originally Posted by 63mako
The Darts flow 267 & 174 @ .600 The Brodix IK 200 flow 262 and 177 @ .600. Think they are cheaper. Good quality for the price and pretty nice I/E ratio. They are flowing this with 2.02, 1.60valves. Sometimes bigger valves on a 4.030 bore will be somewhat shrouded and won't really flow better. That might explain the lower than expected flow numbers.
Or spend a little more and go AFR 195's. They outflow both with much better I/E ratio and better port velocity.
Careful of IK 200 intake port/gasket size! At least one forum member had problem ... ZZ4 manifold so small it left part of IK 200 opening uncovered. AFAIK , IK 200 requires very large FP 1206 gasket ... and most low rise (vette hood) intakes have a small port & do not match well to IK 200 large openings. IK 180 not a problem ... uses FP 1204. IK 210 uses FP 1205 ... even smaller than IK 200.
That is a problem, I thought it used the 1205 but it uses the 1206
thats a big opening. I have a new victor Jr manifold thats about
20 yrs old I never did use, I laid a smaller 1205 on the opening and its
really to big for the manifold, but this victor Jr was ment to work
with a set of phase one chevy bowtie heads, the other victor Jr manifolds
must surely have a bigger opening or more outside material.
Guru better stick with the dart 200 if thats what you want.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Dec 4, 2007 at 06:55 AM.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.