When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I understand if you bore 0.060, and stroke to 4.25,
A 454 becomes a 496.
Has anyone done this, and what kind of HP/TQ numbers have you seen?
Pros? Cons?
by the title i thought you were talking about something else... j/k. I have seen a 454 in a 65ish vette around my area. he says its stroked and bored to 496 and supposibly (sp?) makes 550 hp on 10.5:1 compression. i didnt even ask for TQ
I have a 4-bolt 454 block bored 0.100 over, 4.25" stroke crank, eagle stroker rods (1/8" longer than stock), JE pistons and a Crower mechanical roller cam, .650 lift @ 108 degrees. Last year I ran it with heaviliy modified iron oval port heads, but have now changed to Brodix BB1 so I can run on pump gas with my 10.7 to 1 compression pistons. Displacement is 505.
The motor is a torque monster, with the iron heads it could spin the 335 BFG R1 tires on a roll in first or second with 3.08 gears. I don't have the car sorted yet due to conflicts with work but I anticipate the new heads will work much better.
Crank will fit in the block with minor work to pan rails, windage tray and clearancing of the stock pan.
John:
That was originally my plan, but after talking with MoMo I changed my mind. I already purchased my 6.135" forged rods. As it turns out, how high you can rev your engine is determined a lot by your rod/stroke ratio. With the 6.135" rods I could only rev the engine to about 5700RPMs (could probably do 6000RPMs...but would be pushing it). The lower your rod/stroke ratio, the higher the piston speed. Running a 6.135" rod with a 4.25" stroker crank, creates a lot of piston speed and stress on the rod. As I said before, I could have gone to a longer rod...but I already purchased my forged rods. Basically a 454 is already a stroked 427...by stroking a 454 you are essentially "double" stroking a 427. With the stock 4" crank, I'll be able to rev my engine to 6700 RPMs without any worries.
Bence13_33 496's through just under 510 ci motors have no problem spinning high 7000's all day long. My endurance race boat ran for years without a teardown with 12.8 C/R and hilborne injection and @ 1000 hp. Today my old 509 or what ever the ci is exactly is in a low 9 second 67 Camero prostreeter 2500 lbs. He's been running it 3 years to 8000+ rpm.
If you have the money or need a new crank shaft for what ever reason stroker motors are a fun way to go.
I have a rat test in front of me. It consists of a 496 using stock 454 pistons milled .100 a comp cam 288 Street roller, 9.2 compression and 850 double pumper , oval heads. 612 HP 570 torque.
With a hotter 296 street roller cam, 9.7 compression, 1050 dominator 666HP and 566 torque. Heads rectangular port.
It should be noted that I did not say that stroker engines can't be revved high. I only said that with the stock 6.135" rods and a 4.25" stroker crank, I would have to shift no later than 6000 RPMs or take the risk of things coming apart. GDaina, you have longer rods therefore your rod/stroke ratio is higher and gives you the ability to rev higher by reducing the piston speed. I just thought I would point that out, sorry for any confusion.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.