Son-of-a-!#%^& Clutch not disengaging
#41
looked a little bent on the end or was it flat. You have a factory bellhousing no scattershield pivot ball BS. either call Zoom try to fiqure out what your supposed to have or if your buddys still around for help jerk it back out. Hell you have done this about three times you must have it down to a science on pulling it .
You do have the clutch plate in right ??
Last edited by Little Mouse; 04-11-2008 at 10:00 PM.
#44
Drifting
IMO the only correct fix for this is to use a different length pivot ball for the fork and/or different length throw-out bearing.
Any other linkage tweaks are only masking the issue by giving you the perceived free-play to be able to disengage the clutch- But in reality, your fork and throw-out bearing geometry are whacked and something is going to wear out prematurely as a result.
Think about it- When you replace a clutch, the only things that can change are the spring height of the installed pressure plate, the thickness of the flywheel (assuming you are using the OE bellhousing) or perhaps the length of the throw-out bearing.
The relationship of the Z-shaft to the clutch pedal or Z-shaft to the engine/frame/transmission does not change. So why would you change the length of the factory rods to accommodate?
The amount of 'playing' room between the throw-out bearing, the clutch and the fork to be in proper alignment are very small but needs to be correct. Otherwise you will be wearing out throw out bearings and forks right and left. A small difference in pivot or throw out bearing height translates into a huge difference at the clutch pedal.
The amount of adjustment of the factory linkage takes into account any acceptable variations due to wear etc while keeping an acceptable relationship between the fork/bearing/clutch. If you have to go outside this range, you can bet money that your fork to bearing/clutch angles are pretty messed up.
The only place I can see the valid use of different length rods is if you are swapping to an aftermarket bellhousing and the distance between the flywheel and the fork's pivot point varies substantially (more than you can accommodate with a different length pivot ball) from the factory dimensions.
Just my 2 cents from an engineering standpoint.
Elm
Any other linkage tweaks are only masking the issue by giving you the perceived free-play to be able to disengage the clutch- But in reality, your fork and throw-out bearing geometry are whacked and something is going to wear out prematurely as a result.
Think about it- When you replace a clutch, the only things that can change are the spring height of the installed pressure plate, the thickness of the flywheel (assuming you are using the OE bellhousing) or perhaps the length of the throw-out bearing.
The relationship of the Z-shaft to the clutch pedal or Z-shaft to the engine/frame/transmission does not change. So why would you change the length of the factory rods to accommodate?
The amount of 'playing' room between the throw-out bearing, the clutch and the fork to be in proper alignment are very small but needs to be correct. Otherwise you will be wearing out throw out bearings and forks right and left. A small difference in pivot or throw out bearing height translates into a huge difference at the clutch pedal.
The amount of adjustment of the factory linkage takes into account any acceptable variations due to wear etc while keeping an acceptable relationship between the fork/bearing/clutch. If you have to go outside this range, you can bet money that your fork to bearing/clutch angles are pretty messed up.
The only place I can see the valid use of different length rods is if you are swapping to an aftermarket bellhousing and the distance between the flywheel and the fork's pivot point varies substantially (more than you can accommodate with a different length pivot ball) from the factory dimensions.
Just my 2 cents from an engineering standpoint.
Elm
#46
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Inver Grove Minnesota
Posts: 3,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#47
Well if theres nothing wrong the linkage, you have a simple factory bell housing sounds like its not getting fixed without pulling the trans again.
there is no way with a brand new flywheel, clutch disc with no wear
on it, you should have to be modding linkages.
there is no way with a brand new flywheel, clutch disc with no wear
on it, you should have to be modding linkages.
#48
out on the floor did you put the flywheel bolts in the flywheel
lay the disc on the flywheel see if it layed flat. the center hub is a little thicker on one side.
#51
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Inver Grove Minnesota
Posts: 3,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We are talking about the clutch disk not getting caught on the flywheel a problem I had with the other flywheel I sent back. I know that it disengages. I pushed the clutch down and has my friend rotate the tires. With the clutch out in gear it was impossible. I have no idea what throw out bearing I have it just says standard on the summit page. I looked at teh papers that came with it and there is nothing about it.
#52
look up through the clutch fork hole look at the pressure plate
cone see if the ends on it are flat or just a little bent, take a look at the throwout bearing. how good is your litte digital camera.
#53
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Inver Grove Minnesota
Posts: 3,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#54
Had to go to the store, looks like a bent spring, Ironcross says it uses the short throwout bearing. that seems to rule out the throwout bearing. what did the linkage parts clutch fork come off of were there any different clutch forks between makes of cars.
Last edited by Little Mouse; 04-12-2008 at 12:45 AM.
#56
#57
Safety Car
Thread Starter
Member Since: Jun 2005
Location: Inver Grove Minnesota
Posts: 3,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#59
Race Director
The clutch parts appear to be correct in the picture as it shows a bent cone diaphragm pressure plate. The fork may need to be straighter then the one your using. Camaro parts would never work as its a hydraulic assisted unit with the release bearing part of the plate. You have what you need.
#60
Pro
Member Since: Sep 2002
Location: Melbourne, Fla. 6 months- New Middletown, Ohio 6 months
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
In the GM partsdirect site they show a clutch fork release rod at 8 37/64 total length. This is the measurement from the center of the hole to the center of the 90 degree bent pin that goes into the z-bar. The z-bar should be 11” long. The end that attaches to the pushrod should be 4” from center of the shaft to center of the pushrod hole. The measurement on the clutch pedal end is 4 11/16” Now if you lay the z-bar on a flat surface it should want to lay with the clutch fork rod end sticking up in the air. The measurement from the flat surface up to the centerline of the hole is 2 ¾” The clutch pedal rod length is 15 7/8” from center of hole to tip of threaded end. GM # 3921654
All of these measurements come from new ZIP parts. Yes, one or more of them could be incorrect but if any of your measurements differ I would think that would be a good starting point.
I have read this a couple times, hope I got everything right.
Last edited by Red 71; 04-12-2008 at 04:03 PM.