C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TKO 5 Speed Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2008, 05:14 PM
  #1  
BrooksCJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BrooksCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Parrish Florida
Posts: 113
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts

Default TKO 5 Speed Questions

I have a 70 Vette with 3.36 rear gears/350 ci engine (430 HP) and I have been talking to Keisler and Classic Chevy about which TKO to purchase (500 (.68) or 600 (.64)). One company recommends the TKO 600 (.64), since I have 3.36 rear gears and I would have to shift out of first gear to quickly in the TKO 500 (.68) model. The other company says I would be fine with the TKO 500 (.68). I assume that all the transmission gear ratio's in the Keisler TKO 500 (.68) and Classic Chevy TKO 500 (.68) are the same and also the ones in the TKO 600's (.64) are too.

Does anyone have this rear gear setup (3.36) and a TKO transmission? If so, which TKO would you recommend?


Also, does anyone have the Keisler hydraulic clutch setup in their TKO? If so, was it worth the cost? Classic Chevy doesn't recommend this, due to the Vette firewall being fiberglass and they say it can flex when pushing in the clutch. Is this an accurate statement or just a sales pitch? The manual clutch setup makes my leg tired, since I'm in the city a lot, so a hydraulic setup would be nice.

Thanks in advance for the help guys.
C.J.

Last edited by BrooksCJ; 04-11-2008 at 05:58 PM. Reason: Added engine size
Old 04-11-2008, 05:25 PM
  #2  
Eddie 70
Race Director
Support Corvetteforum!
 
Eddie 70's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 1999
Location: Lenoir City Tennessee
Posts: 19,658
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
Ci 6, 8 & 10 Veteran
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15


Default

Its been a while since I have driven mine but I have the same setup you are describing in my 70. 3.36 with an older Keisler kit. In my opinion it works great. You get out of the hole quickly and get the mileage on top. As far as the clutch is concerned, I am still running manual clutch linkage. Can't help you on that one.
Old 04-11-2008, 05:30 PM
  #3  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,751
Received 1,330 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

get the 600 with the .82 od Modern clutchs don't require very much petal effort.

3.36 X .82 = 2.755
Old 04-11-2008, 05:32 PM
  #4  
bahamasair
Racer
 
bahamasair's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Nassau
Posts: 402
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I cant give you a good answer on the trans gearing but I got the .64. Since you are shopping for quotes on 5 speed kits you should check out vettesbydesign on this forum. I just got my TKO from him today and will have the rest of the parts shortly and post up some pics. He was easy to deal with and prompt shipping everything out. Prices are good too.
Old 04-11-2008, 05:51 PM
  #5  
gkull
Team Owner
 
gkull's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 1999
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 21,751
Received 1,330 Likes on 1,058 Posts

Default

If you have a 430 hp 350 ci small block you don't really have the TQ to use a .68 or .64 OD
Old 04-11-2008, 06:02 PM
  #6  
BrooksCJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BrooksCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Parrish Florida
Posts: 113
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Eddie 70
Its been a while since I have driven mine but I have the same setup you are describing in my 70. 3.36 with an older Keisler kit. In my opinion it works great. You get out of the hole quickly and get the mileage on top. As far as the clutch is concerned, I am still running manual clutch linkage. Can't help you on that one.
Eddie70,
I see that you are satisfied with your TKO and I was wondering if you have the 500 or 600 model? Thanks.

C.J.
Old 04-11-2008, 06:05 PM
  #7  
BrooksCJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BrooksCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Parrish Florida
Posts: 113
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bahamasair
I cant give you a good answer on the trans gearing but I got the .64. Since you are shopping for quotes on 5 speed kits you should check out vettesbydesign on this forum. I just got my TKO from him today and will have the rest of the parts shortly and post up some pics. He was easy to deal with and prompt shipping everything out. Prices are good too.
Bahamasair,
Please let me know how your install goes and if you had to do any mods. If the price is right and the install goes fairly smooth, I'll check into getting my TKo from VettesByDesign.

C.J.
Old 04-11-2008, 06:14 PM
  #8  
LB66383
Drifting
 
LB66383's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2002
Location: Long Beach CA
Posts: 1,942
Received 26 Likes on 25 Posts

Default

Are those numbers correct? I know the 600 has a .64 fifth gear. I thought the 500 had a .82. Anyway, I put the 600 with the 2.8 first gear and .64 fifth gear in an early Camaro with 3.42 rear end. So, similar to your situation. The first gear, and the spacing in the first four gears are ideal. The 3.2 first gear in the 500 would be way too low. However, the .64 fifth gear is too high. I'm turning only 1,900-2,000 rpm on the freeway at around 70 mph. Something closer to 2,400 rpm would be more ideal. In other words, the optimum cruising speed is more like 85 mph, which doesn't work for the boys in blue around here.
Old 04-11-2008, 06:34 PM
  #9  
BrooksCJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BrooksCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Parrish Florida
Posts: 113
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by LB66383
Are those numbers correct? I know the 600 has a .64 fifth gear. I thought the 500 had a .82. Anyway, I put the 600 with the 2.8 first gear and .64 fifth gear in an early Camaro with 3.42 rear end. So, similar to your situation. The first gear, and the spacing in the first four gears are ideal. The 3.2 first gear in the 500 would be way too low. However, the .64 fifth gear is too high. I'm turning only 1,900-2,000 rpm on the freeway at around 70 mph. Something closer to 2,400 rpm would be more ideal. In other words, the optimum cruising speed is more like 85 mph, which doesn't work for the boys in blue around here.
LB66383,
Thanks for the input. Below is a link to the gear specs from Classic Chevy's website for reference.

http://www.classicchevy5speed.com/De...it-Tremec.aspx

C.J.
Old 04-11-2008, 06:49 PM
  #10  
Daffy2
Pro
 
Daffy2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Location: Johnsonville Wi
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default TKO trannies

I have a 430 hp small block. It has good torque. I have 3:36 gearing and have selected the TKO 660 RR tans for the 5th gear reduction of 18 percent. The TKO 600 gives the 3:36 rear gear a effective multiplyer of a 3:82 rear gearin first.
I can fry my tires at will with the 3:36 and the 3:82 effective first gear will be only more grins. The 18% over drive of the TKO RR drops 70 mph rpm's from 3,000 to 2,400. Perfect.
The TKO 500 gives a 3:36 rear car a first gear rate of 4:30 or so. Dumb, less you got a 250 hp motor.
Do the math, you know your car: what ratio do want for first gear acceleration and what rpm's do you want to run at your cruising mph.
Both Kiesler and Classic Chevy have calculators on their websites.

Daffy
Old 04-11-2008, 07:07 PM
  #11  
Gordonm
Race Director
 
Gordonm's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Forked River NJ
Posts: 19,592
Received 754 Likes on 464 Posts

Default

The 500 has a 3.27 first gear and the 600 has a 2.87 1st gear. The 600 can be had with either a .82 or a .64 OD. So all 3 transmissions have different gearing. With 3.36 gears I would stay with the 600 with a .82 OD. I have a .68 OD with 3.70 gears and 5th gear is not used until about 55 mph. I also had a 350 with about 420 HP before this motor and I ran a .68 OD with a 3.70 gear and it worked well but 5th was useless below 50 mph. With 3.36 gears you would have to be doing 70+ to really use 5th with a .68 or .64 OD. Keisler list all the ratios on their website.

Last edited by Gordonm; 04-11-2008 at 07:11 PM.
Old 04-11-2008, 07:26 PM
  #12  
Belgian1979vette
Melting Slicks
 
Belgian1979vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Beringen
Posts: 2,164
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gkull
If you have a 430 hp 350 ci small block you don't really have the TQ to use a .68 or .64 OD
What is the theory behind this ? A car driving at say 75 mph doesn't need the total torque of the engine to keep it going just a fraction.
Difference is top speed in fifth. It will probably not reacht maximum in fifth but that is seldomly used in normal use.
Old 04-11-2008, 07:33 PM
  #13  
OzzyTom
Burning Brakes
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 1,004
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I have a 3.36:1 diff, and the TKO600RR (0.82 OD) with the McLeod internal Hydraulic throwout bearing.

Motor is a healthy 383.... rated at 475hp / 460ftlb

In my case, with the 3.36 diff, I wanted to be sure the motor was spinning in a sweet spot whilst cruising rather than lugging.

I have a 242/240 @0.050 roller cam which doesn't really like sitting below 1800 rpm. 2300rpm @ 70mph suits me fine.

Gear shifts are light and precise, clutch is a pleasure to use, and the gearing is spot on to take advantage of strong midrange and upper rpm power.

I would consider the best option is to have a 3.70:1 diff ratio with the TKO600 (0.64 OD)

Ideal for performance and still maintains good highway cruising rpm.

Another club member has a 3.36 diff with the TKO600 and the 0.64 OD and is very happy too. He does a lot of country interstate touring, and loves the quiet ride and improved fuel economy. He has a stock 350 though, and motor is happy to choof along at 1600~1700 rpm.

In regards to clutch / firewall flex.... I have a right hand drive vette, and the biggest hassle I had was having to fabricate a RHD clutch pedal mounting with proper alignment for the master cylinder rod travel.

To minimise movement, I added a cross brace which secures the clutch pedal mount to the steering column mount assembly.
Also had to use plastibond to fill up the gap between the plate and the inside contour of the firewall.

It works well, but was the most time consuming part of the conversion.



I did spring a leak at the MC after the first week due to the clutch rod NOT being aligned well enough with the MC bore.
I then machined an aluminium tapered bracket to add 5* slope to the MC. No problems since.



cheers
tom

Last edited by OzzyTom; 04-11-2008 at 08:33 PM.
Old 04-11-2008, 07:35 PM
  #14  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

5th gear is all about highway driving an fuel economy for me. I have the TKO 600 with .64 OD with a 3.08 rear end.

80 mph on the highway is less than 2000 RPM's and I love it. I do have over 450ft/lbs of torque at 2000 RPM though. You need some torque to pull the 5th gear. If it were my old 355ci I would not even be able to shift it into 5th
Old 04-11-2008, 08:58 PM
  #15  
BrooksCJ
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
BrooksCJ's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2007
Location: Parrish Florida
Posts: 113
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MotorHead
5th gear is all about highway driving an fuel economy for me. I have the TKO 600 with .64 OD with a 3.08 rear end.

80 mph on the highway is less than 2000 RPM's and I love it. I do have over 450ft/lbs of torque at 2000 RPM though. You need some torque to pull the 5th gear. If it were my old 355ci I would not even be able to shift it into 5th
MotorHead,

My motor specs say I have 425 lbs. of torque. Do you think this is enough torque to turn the .64 OD? The link below takes you to the motor.

http://www.enginefactory.com/350_430hp.htm

Thanks,
C.J.
Old 04-11-2008, 10:56 PM
  #16  
TopGunn
Drifting
 
TopGunn's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Somers CT
Posts: 1,622
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have the TK0-500 and 3:36 gears and about the same hp as you. Mine comes out of the hole like a jackrabbit and the rev's come up real quick. I would never run a rear gear any lower than a 3:36 otherwise 1st gear would be useless.
At 70 mine does about 1800 if I remember right, the OD is useless at under 55mph.
Old 04-11-2008, 11:07 PM
  #17  
MotorHead
Race Director
 
MotorHead's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2000
Location: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Posts: 17,569
Received 156 Likes on 126 Posts

Default

At 70 mph with your 3.36 you will be at 2000RPM approx. with the .64 overdrive. The torque at this RPM to the wheels would be around 200 maybe a bit more. Your peak TQ to the wheels might be 325 but at a much higher RPM.

Mine puts out 360ft/lbs at 2000RPM to the wheels so I would say you might not be having any fun with 3.36 rear and .64 OD Could be wrong on this but I personally could see a problem if my torque was any lower, it would just start to lug along

YOu really need big torque or higher gears

Get notified of new replies

To TKO 5 Speed Questions

Old 04-11-2008, 11:19 PM
  #18  
fauxrs2
Drifting
 
fauxrs2's Avatar
 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: San diego ca
Posts: 1,738
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordonm
I have a .68 OD with 3.70 gears and 5th gear is not used until about 55 mph. I also had a 350 with about 420 HP before this motor and I ran a .68 OD with a 3.70 gear and it worked well but 5th was useless below 50 mph. With 3.36 gears you would have to be doing 70+ to really use 5th with a .68 or .64 OD. Keisler list all the ratios on their website.
In street driving I can go into 5th at about 45....and cruise around essentially idling...on the freeway I get into 5th around 50-55 as described above...but theres not much grunt at this point...if i had to pass someone I better be going 70 to start with or downshift

3:70 rears TKO .68 OD...

But I can get stellar gas mileage just bopping down the freeway.. and in 1st gear I could climb a telephone pole
Old 04-11-2008, 11:50 PM
  #19  
bahamasair
Racer
 
bahamasair's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Nassau
Posts: 402
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BrooksCJ
Bahamasair,
Please let me know how your install goes and if you had to do any mods. If the price is right and the install goes fairly smooth, I'll check into getting my TKo from VettesByDesign.

C.J.
Will do bud.
Old 04-12-2008, 02:57 AM
  #20  
OzzyTom
Burning Brakes
 
OzzyTom's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2003
Location: Adelaide South Australia
Posts: 1,004
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Belgian1979vette
What is the theory behind this ? A car driving at say 75 mph doesn't need the total torque of the engine to keep it going just a fraction.
Difference is top speed in fifth. It will probably not reach maximum in fifth but that is seldomly used in normal use.
I think Gkull is pointing out that a 430hp 350 is quite stout, but probably will not have as much torque below 2000 rpm as a stocky.
Your 430 lb-ft of torque is most likely at about 4500 rpm.
Although the engine will chug along and maintain highway speeds at 1800 rpm, it will not be comfortable in accellerating for overtaking slower traffic if left in 5th... a down change might be necessary.

Like I said previously, with a stock 350, 3.36 diff and 0.64 OD one of my mates has no issues. But a performance engine may not be as comfortable chugging along at 1800rpm.

I also had a lot of issues with my Edelbrock carb supplied by enginefactory on my 383. Could NOT get it to run right, even with a lot of time spent on the dyno to sort it out. I've now put on a Holley double pumper, and the off idle hesitation, and issues with part throttle below 2000 rpm are solved. Longer term plan is for multipoint fuel injection with computerised ignition/fuel maps, which would do wonders for optimising torque even at lower rpm


Quick Reply: TKO 5 Speed Questions



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 AM.