Bottom end mileage
Why not wait until the motor is opened up than evaluate the bottom end than while it can be inspected than plan your rebuild accordingly.
The L82 bottom end should be fine after only 60,000 miles assuming the motor wasn't beat to death and it was maintained well but you never know.
Why not wait until the motor is opened up than evaluate the bottom end than while it can be inspected than plan your rebuild accordingly.
The L82 bottom end should be fine after only 60,000 miles assuming the motor wasn't beat to death and it was maintained well but you never know.

any answer would be a vast generalization..for example my L-82 at 104k didnt show any perceptible ridge at the top of the cylinder bore, still made excellent oil pressure and maintained good cylinder pressure...while i dont know how the motor was treated by previous owners mine wasnt raced and was maintained like any old car motor should.
at 104k it wiped a lobe on the original cam - rebuild was basicly stab a new cam.
Alternately I've seen motors that at 60k were complete and utter basket cases..
If a rebuild is in the cards for you, take the short apart and inspect it..in all likelyhood it could be reused as is..it may last another 60 or so. I at the very least would re-ring and bearing any rebuild of a motor that had 60k miles on it before the build...simply for cheap insurance.




BUT, you're going to have it out, it's no big step from there to do rings and bearings. Assuming all the crank/rod/cylinder bore measurements are within tolerances, and you add a couple of things to the parts list, (oil pump/pickup) you KNOW what you have for sure. No guesswork. And if you get the block hot tank cleaned, it'll be just like new. (and the paint will stick!)


At 60K you would be wasting your time unless the motor was left underwater or somehow sand got in the oil past the filter. The taxi cabs ran the sb chevy and have a good data base for overhaul - 350K mi.
Yes 350,000 mi. Now if the car has sat alot then maybe the seals dried out and may need replacement - just timing cover over the snout and the rear main which will require u to drop the oil pan (a great time to take a look inside too). And the nice part is you can drop the oil pan on a corvette with engine and trans in car.But really all the bearings are covered well (nearly sealed) by the bearing caps and long term storage is not a problem for brgs - this is from what i have seen myself on mine. Usually just the seals will dry out without periodic use. But u can replace seals at your own choice.
A leakdown test for your own info would be nice before removing heads. This would give you an idea of the cylinders condition. Save yourself a lot of work and just do the head swap first.: :
Just to help you here if you have never taken an engine apart before - even just the heads - make sure u know how to tune the ignition and carb first.
I just read too many horror stories right here were new C3 owners ruin an entire overhaul because the new engine won't start. Yes first priority is to setup your timing - not just the initial but the entire timing curve including changing dist weights and springs. Next set the carb mixture - not just the idle mix screws but the mix rods on Qjet or jets on Holleys. This is a lot more headwork and research than labor but very little $$$ to tune the engine. And u will be surprised how much HP is from just a good tune.Hope this helps ya',

cardo0
Thanks Cardo0 for the heads-up on the tuning, I understand the importance of the engine starting immediately after a cam swap. I’m also very familiar with both of Lars ignition and Quadrajet tuning papers.
Thanks for the guidance..


It was good to read u realize the importance of good tune as the '78 cars were significantly detuned in timing and mixture for smog - something like at least 30hp. A lot of new C3 owners put too much effort and $$$ into hp parts that never seem to produce as expected because the eng remains out of tune with the old dizzy and carb settings.
One more thing the L-82 had a decent preformance cam (much better than the L-48 and I think the L-82 cam is still used the Chevy crate mtrs). Now with 60K it would be a good time to replace the cam as cams have a much shorter life than the bottom end (as the full lift wears out). But that L-82 cam (#3896962 or HO cam #24502476 i think) is a great match for those Vortec heads with the increase in compression they give.
And u can buy that cam as a repro for fairly cheap through most parts houses - and u know it will drive great around town with good power.Happy tuning and good luck,
cardo0
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...2118109&page=2
I decided to go with the Lunati Bracket Master
http://www.lunaticams.com/Product.aspx?id=2416&gid=292
Thanks again for feedback.
Check cam lobe lift ... if you want L82 cam ... and have old L82 ... and the L82 cam&lifters you have is not worn ... you're better off reusing L82 cam&lifters you have 'cuz it's already bedded in ... most flattappet cam&lifter failures occur during or soon after breakin.


http://forums.corvetteforum.com/show...2118109&page=2
I decided to go with the Lunati Bracket Master
http://www.lunaticams.com/Product.aspx?id=2416&gid=292
Thanks again for feedback.
Don't compare GM's adv duration numbers to Lunati's - not even similar.
As for the L-82 cam #3896962 it is single pattern cam too with a wider LSA (BTW take a look at it's adv duration too = 312*/312* just for comparison
). What i want to say is that HO 2476 cam will make even more mid range torque than the Bracket Master II and drive a heck of a lot better on the street with enough vacuum for your accessories. What the DD doesn't tell you is things like vac for pwr brakes and headlights. Neither does the dynamic compression ratio miscalculator.
Just trying to help and i know now u will listen so good luck with what ever u choose,

cardo0
Opinions and experience is what I like about these forums. Here’s my cam short list. I agree, the Lunati cam is probably on the edge of being too big. The GM 24502476 or Crane Blue Racer is probably a safer choice. The XE262 pushes the lift limit on the stock Vortecs. Here’s a link I stumbled across a few days ago that has some good discussion on the GM cams and Vortec heads.
http://www.chevelles.com/forums/arch.../t-111053.html
*Cam List*
Summit SUM-K1103
Intake Lift-0.442
Exhaust lift-0.465
Intake duration @ .050"-214
Exhaust duration @ .050"-224
Lobe Centerline- 112
GM 24502476
Intake Lift-0.435
Exhaust lift-0.460
Intake duration @ .050"-212
Exhaust duration @ .050"-222
Lobe Centerline- 112
Crane WG1159K
Intake Lift-0.442
Exhaust lift-0.465
Intake duration @ .050"-214
Exhaust duration @ .050"-222
Lobe Centerline- 112
GM 3896962
Intake Lift-0.450
Exhaust lift-0.460
Intake duration @ .050"-222
Exhaust duration @ .050"-222
Lobe Centerline- 114
Recommendations from Vendors
Lunati 00017
Intake Lift-0.460
Exhaust lift-0.460
Intake duration @ .050"-224
Exhaust duration @ .050"-224
Lobe Centerline- 112
Crane 113512
Intake Lift-0.446
Exhaust lift-0.459
Intake duration @ .050"-212
Exhaust duration @ .050"-218
Lobe Centerline- 114
Comp XE262H
Intake Lift-0.462
Exhaust lift-0.469
Intake duration @ .050"-218
Exhaust duration @ .050"-224
Lobe Centerline- 110
My intent all along was to replace the ole stock heads, cam/lifters and convert to true duel exhaust. Since I'm replacing the cam, the timing chain and gear will also get replaced. The oil pump is only 5 years old so it should be OK. On the headers note, my original intent was to stick with the stock manifolds and get the duel kit from Mid America. However, I have since realized for the same money I can get a set of Jegs headers and Hooker header back duel kit. I have been reluctant to make the move to headers because of heat and leak problems Ive heard from other forum members. But your right, If I'm this far into it, headers may make since now. I have some time to think about this stuff because I don't plan to start anything till mid Nov.












