383 crate motor
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
383 crate motor
I have a 79 Vette auto w/ 355 gears. Car is a weekend driver. Looking to go w/ a 383 crate. First one is a 425hp/465tq and the other is a 460hp/465tq. What combo would you choose for sometimes "spirited" street driving? 
Instructor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 3
From: Indiana
Check these out. I have been looking at the A1 and A3. (408 not 383)
http://www.tandlengines.com/chevy_sb...num_index.html
http://www.tandlengines.com/chevy_sb...num_index.html
Last edited by GeorgeS; Feb 25, 2009 at 01:33 PM.
Drifting
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,682
Likes: 3
From: League City TX
If you were to list some details of the parts, or post a couple of links to the engine descriptions you will get better answers.
Race Director
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,674
Likes: 122
From: Millington Illinois
St. Jude Donor '08-'09
Check these out. I have been looking at the A1 and A3. (408 not 383)
http://www.tandlengines.com/chevy_sb...num_index.html
http://www.tandlengines.com/chevy_sb...num_index.html
408 A3 is real close to my build, same heads, same cam, little less compression. next size bigger stroke. I got over $6000 in my long block. I have heard nothing but good things about T&L except sometimes they take a little longer to build them. All the real good shops take a little longer it seems.
Last edited by 63mako; Feb 25, 2009 at 09:40 PM.
Thread Starter
Racer
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: Wheaton, Illinois
I am looking at the T&L Engines. The 383 w/ 425hp and the 460hp motors. Both have aluminum heads and roller cams. Both have 465tq. Which one would be a better street engine in a 79 Vette?
Pro
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
From: Frisco TX
Whichever one fits under the stock hood
Both motors probably use some sort of high rise intake to make those numbers. Make sure you check hood clearance.
Good luck,
Ed
Instructor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 3
From: Indiana
Both seem to have the Edlebrock RPM intake and it will not fit under a standard Corvette hood.. I have Edlebrock Torker II on my 68 and it fits fine. If interested in this engine combo, I would call T&L and talk to them about height?
Last edited by GeorgeS; Feb 25, 2009 at 04:58 PM.
Race Director
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 10,046
Likes: 675
From: FL
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Top 10 Most Expensive Corvettes Ever Sold on Bring A Trailer
Brett Foote
10 Things Every Corvette Owner Needs (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Henrico VA
[QUOTE=SteveG75;1569084540]An RPM manifold may not fit under an early C3 SB hood, but it fits fine under a 73-75 (or even 79) hood. Edelbrock assumes stock aircleaner. I have an Edelbrock RPM Q-Jet (same height as an RPM or Air Gap) with Moroso Low Profile Racing Air Cleaner and 3" filter. 3/4" clearance at the front of the filter.QUOTE]
Steve, thanks for a great page!
Steve & George, I have a 355 and used to run a '69 SB hood and Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. The books say it won't fit, but it did.
Steve, thanks for a great page!
Steve & George, I have a 355 and used to run a '69 SB hood and Edelbrock Performer RPM intake. The books say it won't fit, but it did.
Burning Brakes
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,004
Likes: 7
From: Adelaide South Australia
Mine has issues cruising along in top gear at less than 1500 rpm due to the cam, but I figure the T&L 425 hp motor will be exceptional on the street....
I managed 325 rwhp on the chassis dyno, with ~370 ft-lb at the rear wheels.
It is a lot, lot, lot more fun than the 327 slushbox I had before.
Any car that has an honest 300 horses at the wheels will be fun to drive, let alone one that has oodles of torque too.
You'll love it.
ps Those T&L engine specs look real good.
Last edited by OzzyTom; Feb 26, 2009 at 07:40 PM.
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Henrico VA
