Quadrajet Gurus- Please help!
Jet sizes appear to top out at size 79, which I'm now using, still lean. With the biggest jets available already in this carb, it's still lean. I don't think I can physically make the WOT metering area any larger.
It's so lean that I'm getting audible detonation (at least I think that's what I'm hearing) at anything above cruise, and temperatures creep up if I retard timing to avoid detonation- and it doesn't seem to reduce the detonation anyway. I'm failing to think of words to describe the sound, except I remember it when old 70's cars would overheat it was common to hear, and it sounds a bit like run-on used to sound. Kind of like a metallic, more pronounced version of what frying bacon sounds like I guess.
Would it help to switch to another Quadrajet model that had smaller primary jets stock so that I have a little more range to fatten it up? It doesn't make logical sense since the metering area at WOT would be smaller, but I may be missing something- like a richer idle circuit might exist in some models or something, or other factors completely unknown to me.
I know so little about tuning that I'm flat out dangerous with this wideband O2 sensor. It seems impossible to get anywhere near 12-13:1 at WOT no matter what I do, so I can't even begin to tune part throttle yet.
HELP!!!!
Details:
Idle AFR: 14 (idle screws so far out that half-turns no longer register any additional flow)
Cruise AFR: 15-17
Part (light) throttle accel: 14:1
WOT AFR: 13.5-14:1
Idle quality- moderate, idles in gear at 600 RPM warm easily
Car combo:
409 SBC, 10.56:1 CR, .039" quench (zero decked block),
Quadrajet 17057204, stock primary & secondary rod sizes
Edelbrock Performer Airgap (non-RPM) intake
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads
Camshaft: Hyd. FT .471/.480 lift, 226/228 @.050, 110 LCA, 4 deg advanced, degreed.
Summit/Dynomax 1-5/8" headers
2-1/2" mandrel bent exhaust, TIG welded stainless with X pipe, made from Magnaflow kit, using Magnaflow 2-1/2" mufflers
New aftermarket HEI ignition, one gold & one silver curve springs, tried
Tuning parameters:
I started with the timing range 34-38 deg total mech. timing
16" vacuum at idle in park
Last edited by dstaley; Aug 7, 2009 at 09:50 AM. Reason: correction
However, except for the secondary hangers, none of these come into play under WOT, do they?
springs are color coded for in of vacuum just like a holley.
main metering rods have different tapers to enrichen the mixture.
Also, remove the secondary rod hanger (and rods) and see if it goes rich, or stays lean. If it goes rich, you just need to get a richer set of secondary rods (this one is easy). If lean, you may have to have the idle circuit modified.
Try these and let me know how it goes. There are also other factors that could be causing the problems. I've seen poor commercial rebuilds where fuel passages were partially blocked by cleaning media! The bottom line is, you don't need another carb, the one you have can be made to work.
God bless, Sensei
I've read through Lars' papers and absorbed a lot, probably missed much more.
As I understood it, possibly in error, the tips of all primary rods are the same diameter, and this is the portion of the rod that is positioned in the jet at WOT (regardless of which spring is in the carb- I think). Also, and I could be wrong, the secondary rods all have the same size tip, only the taper is different from one to the next.
If I understand this right, first you tune idle (for maximum vacuum), then WOT with the secondaries locked out because the only variable in play affecting WOT is primary jet size. That's the step I'm on.
I'm getting detonation at WOT (and of course at part throttle too).
Again, I might have this all wrong, so I'm just laying out what I know so I can be corrected. Please don't be offended, I am not saying you're wrong- just that I'm obviously confused!
This is incorrect, secondary rod tips vary in size greatly
Last edited by a1sensei; Aug 6, 2009 at 09:58 PM.
Also, remove the secondary rod hanger (and rods) and see if it goes rich, or stays lean. If it goes rich, you just need to get a richer set of secondary rods (this one is easy). If lean, you may have to have the idle circuit modified.
Try these and let me know how it goes. There are also other factors that could be causing the problems. I've seen poor commercial rebuilds where fuel passages were partially blocked by cleaning media! The bottom line is, you don't need another carb, the one you have can be made to work.
God bless, Sensei
Hey, this carburetor was commercially rebuilt- so problems like this ARE a distinct possibility. I bought the carburetor with very few miles on it since purchased rebuilt, and I did note that the rods that came in it were not correct. This was last October. I put little effort into tuning back then because this woke it up, and I knew that after the winter hibernation the nice new exhaust system (described above) would be fabricated. I just finished all that and surprise! It needs more fuel...
Anyway, that's definitely possible. It could be clogged/goofed up/etc from either the original carb owner (before the rebuild) or by the rebuilder.
I drove the car today from my home in central Illinois to Kansas City (with my son). I drove it around town for two weeks with few issues, but during this trip today it seemed to get worse as the engine was thoroughly heat soaked. I don't know if it's temp related or what, but the hour long cruise the night before last didn't reveal the severity I saw today.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
When looking at the jets, you will notice the jet has two digits stamped on the surface. These indicate the diameter of the orifice. For example, 67 indicates a opening with a diameter of 0.067 inch. The part numbers for these are as follows: 7031966 indicates a metering jet with a 0.066 inch opening. Jets run from 66 to 78. So the part numbers will be in the form of 70319xx where xx indicates the number stamped on the jet.
For metering rods, there are two designs-one is a simple taper and the other is a double taper. Rods with a double taper have a "B" after the part number. Rods and jets are interchangeable from 1965-74. In 1975, the Q-jets used have shorter rods and a different taper which is NOT interchangeable with the earlier version. 1975 and up carbs can be identified by the first digit being a one which differentiates these from 1965-74 carbs.
For 1965-7 rods, the part number is as follows: 70318xx where xx indicates the rod diameter at the first diameter change from the rod nominal diameter. Example 7031840 indicates a rod with a 0.040 inch diameter. These were single taper designs. Rods run from 33 to 49.
For 1968-74 rods, the part number is as follows: 70348xx wher xx indicates the rod diameter at the first diameter change from the rod nominal rod diameter. Rods run from 36B to 51B. Remember "B" indicates a double taper rod.
"A" Rods are single taper, "B" (and all others) are double taper. All rods, except those noted below, have a .026" diameter tip.
"M" =.032" diameter tip
"50D" has a .036" diameter tip
I recall the "M" rods were for 1975 & up truck carbs but don't remember about the "D" rods. A 1705xxxx corvette q-jet should use .26 power tip for the most fuel delivery at WOT . The "M" rods would run too lean. I'm sure there was a discussion on this board concerning a method for "turning" the fat power tips down by hand. The "M" rods seem much easier to find.Good luck.
That was my starting point for tuning- not at idle. This was at 3000 RPM (mechanical timing "all in") with vacuum unplugged.
"A" Rods are single taper, "B" (and all others) are double taper. All rods, except those noted below, have a .026" diameter tip.
"M" =.032" diameter tip
"50D" has a .036" diameter tip
I recall the "M" rods were for 1975 & up truck carbs but don't remember about the "D" rods. A 1705xxxx corvette q-jet should use .26 power tip for the most fuel delivery at WOT . The "M" rods would run too lean. I'm sure there was a discussion on this board concerning a method for "turning" the fat power tips down by hand. The "M" rods seem much easier to find.Good luck.

It's the K series primary rods that you need, and they're not manufactured anymore except in a handful of sizes by JET. I'm running M rods right now because I had no choice. They're fine for idle and part throttle, I just go lean at WOT so at some point I was going to try to turn them down the tips to .026.
Certainly, the piston spring might be too weak to be pulling my piston up (and the rod taper out of the jet) so I'm shopping for a tuning kit this AM.
Sure, there are incompatible rods out there with different primary tip sizes (mostly larger?), but are there primary rods with smaller tips? I'm hopeful there are.


Hopefully someone will check what I said, it may at least help you narrow down the problem.
Sean

















All good, just wanted to make sure the timing was square first. Smart Q-Jet people giving guidance, I'm