What is a 454 small block????






Like stated above there is nothing special about an LS motor, you can get $2000 heads that flow 320cfm+ I have them on my motor and they are 23 deg heads, they don't need the 15 degree angle the LS heads need to flow these numbers.
You want to get into different valve angles and closer to the same angle of the LS heads and there are an endless number of heads that will outflow LS heads and you can drive them on the street.
No big deal, cubes is cubes and flow is flow so a Gen 1 motor with same cubes and same flow heads will pull the same as a LS motor simple physics here. To say an 427ci LS motor with heads that flow 350cfm is going to make more power that 427ci Gen 1 motor with heads that flow 350cfm is simply absurd

And...is this an offer to build a 427 CID GEN I SBC and put it up against a GEN III 427 CID engine? Because I'll make more power, for far less money - with a streetable idle, 25 MPG and running the A/C doing it.

All you need to do is pull your head up and look at what's happening right now with the LS and how much power people are making.
What's absurd is this discussion - but it's fun
Last edited by billla; Aug 9, 2009 at 08:54 PM.





HOWEVER- When you see a motor that requires 7 valve cover bolts-now that means business AND you know the oiling system (RE: LS) is not going to fail you.
About the funniest thing I have done in a long time me and a friend
were at a covette dealer standing there talking to the salesman
right beside a C4 with the hood open I looked down said did
you know this car has henry ford transverse springs the look on his face was priceless
HOWEVER- When you see a motor that requires 7 valve cover bolts-now that means business AND you know the oiling system (RE: LS) is not going to fail you.

Last edited by Little Mouse; Aug 9, 2009 at 09:36 PM.
Regardless...that is some kinda nice piece of iron!





And my 427ci makes an easy 650HP as it is right now, I can drive it around like a normal car and it gets over 20mpg on the highway, someone should be pulling their heads out of something

One more thing, I actually have one of these that I built myself, not reading about dyno queens in the C5-C6 section
Last edited by MotorHead; Aug 9, 2009 at 10:58 PM.
Regardless...that is some kinda nice piece of iron!
with todays parts.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Aug 9, 2009 at 11:04 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
And my 427ci makes an easy 650HP as it is right now, I can drive it around like a normal car and it gets over 20mpg on the highway, someone should be pulling their heads out of something

One more thing, I actually have one of these that I built myself, not reading about dyno queens in the C5-C6 section

Oh, but you're right - it can't possibly be better technology - it's just flow 
Dyno sheet, please? And price? And since you built it yourself - willing to risk it against a GEN III/IV on the dyno? Same CID - whoever makes the most power takes 'em both.

I generally find that when someone loses an arguement, they a) change the subject and b) try to cast doubt on the other person. I've built almost 200 GEN I's - so I'm not short of experience. But nice to take a shot. I *knew* there was a reason you were on my <ignore> list - back you go






Oh and say what you want, I'm not coming back to this thread it is so ridiculous
There is nowhere that the LS style engine in small cube form is competitive
not in dirt track cars, drag racing, road racing, or nascar, if it were so everyone of these forms of racing would be using them, there are just no heads available for them that will flow the air numbers that are readly available for the GEN 1
Anyway calling any pushrod two valve engine dating back to the 1800s stone age new technolgy then saying the GEN 1 is old tech this a laughable statement both engines are old technolgy, Chevy even used the same lousy 1955, 4.40 bore center for the LS engine.
Whats next if a shifter might shift a hair smoother in a new car its new
technolgy but the older cars shifter is OLD tech, friggen shifters date
back to the same late 1800s early 1900s as two valve pushrod engines.
But for spending money a BB can make more power with the most standard form of parts cheaper then you can build any form of small block that will stay together trying to make anywhere near the power it can.
Last edited by Little Mouse; Aug 10, 2009 at 05:22 AM.
Fuel on the fire.
What does it take to convert a conventional engine to Little Dukes? I know that on a big block, it's a ton of money beginning with bushed lifter bores, considerably more expensive valvetrain, yada yada. There are plenty of guys making 600+ hp with aluminum and iron LS blocks, ain't too many production small blocks that can handle that for any period of time.
If the "old style" smallblock hadn't needed to be modernized and if the GM engineers had been satisfied with that platform, the LS engine family would have never been born. I hope to be able to watch an 800hp+ solid roller LS427 on the dyno later this week, haven't seen too many smallblocks do that even with aftermarket everything. Other than the valvetrain/cam, this one is built with factory stuff.
But I can see a 409 being called a "big block".
348/409 is generically different than the 366/396/427/454 family.
I could see no real advantage to the LS block.
I could just find no good reason to build one over a GEN 1 for a street engine
There is nowhere that the LS style engine in small cube form is competitive
Anyway calling any pushrod two valve engine dating back to the 1800s stone age new technolgy then saying the GEN 1 is old tech this a laughable statement
But for spending money a BB can make more power with the most standard form of parts cheaper then you can build any form of small block that will stay together trying to make anywhere near the power it can.
For the stock LS6 heads, you consider 260 @.500 and/183cfm @ .650 to be unimpressive? Or the over 315 CFM intake from a set of STOCK TRUCK HEADS to be unimpressive? Sorry, I just don't get your perspective at all.
And the block - I guess I don't even know what to say. These stock blocks are holding 800+ HP, and the LSx was designed for 1200+...so I guess it really must be a "crap" block. Let me know when you're making 800 HP in a stock 350 block - especially one you pull out of a junkyard that's 60 years old
Gosh, I guess all those people putting high horsepower GEN III/IV into old chassis are nuts then. Why would they want 450 HP that idles smooth, gives great gas milage and still runs the A/C compressor? Bottom line is that a quick look through any current car magazine - or just what engines are going into the really hot builds these days - to see which way the wind is blowing.
Nowhere competetive? On what planet? Look at the LSx shootout times and tell me where they're not competetive. The challenge is racing rules that don't change very quickly...that's it. I'll say it again - any time someone wants to bring a GEN I out and put it against a GEN III/IV, same CID, then let's go.
And...again...no way - absolutely no way - will even a BBC make more power per dollar than an LSx. Period.
I guess this is turning into a beer rental return match, and that's not my intent.
I encourage folks to look at rags like CarCraft, Hot Rod and GM High Tech Performance to learn more about what the LS engines are capable of.
A "big block" is based on the Mark IV engine debuted in 1965 with 396 cubic inches. There were also 402, 427, and 454 versions from the factory.
The Gen I small block was superseded by the Gen II family (LT1, LT4) then the Gen III (LS1, LS6) and finally Gen IV (LS2,LS3, LS7, LS9 etc).
The Mark IV big block has grown into the Gen V and Gen VI engines, the most famous of which is the ZZ502 from the factory.
With aftermarket blocks, you can build a 454 "small block" or 540 "big block". You can go bigger with so-called tall deck blocks.
Good site for larger than stock engines:
http://www.ultrastreet.net/
BTW, saw a Chevelle with one of their 540's at a show today. Sounded wicked.
And here is your 454 small block, order today, ship Monday from Summit Racing.
600 hp, $12999.95

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/WR...1/?image=large
For the stock LS6 heads, you consider 260 @.500 and/183cfm @ .650 to be unimpressive? Or the over 315 CFM intake from a set of STOCK TRUCK HEADS to be unimpressive? Sorry, I just don't get your perspective at all.
And the block - I guess I don't even know what to say. These stock blocks are holding 800+ HP, and the LSx was designed for 1200+...so I guess it really must be a "crap" block. Let me know when you're making 800 HP in a stock 350 block - especially one you pull out of a junkyard that's 60 years old
Gosh, I guess all those people putting high horsepower GEN III/IV into old chassis are nuts then. Why would they want 450 HP that idles smooth, gives great gas milage and still runs the A/C compressor? Bottom line is that a quick look through any current car magazine - or just what engines are going into the really hot builds these days - to see which way the wind is blowing.
Nowhere competetive? On what planet? Look at the LSx shootout times and tell me where they're not competetive. The challenge is racing rules that don't change very quickly...that's it. I'll say it again - any time someone wants to bring a GEN I out and put it against a GEN III/IV, same CID, then let's go.
And...again...no way - absolutely no way - will even a BBC make more power per dollar than an LSx. Period.
I guess this is turning into a beer rental return match, and that's not my intent.
I encourage folks to look at rags like CarCraft, Hot Rod and GM High Tech Performance to learn more about what the LS engines are capable of..300 = 198
.400 = 240
.500 = 260
180 comp eliminator
.300 = 203
.400 = 247
.500 = 270
Just like I siad you can buy simple 23 degree heads for the GEN 1
that out flow the 5.7 liter, ZO6 head and flows way more then the
LS1 head, pretty sure a 180 runner is just a mild hydraulic cams 350 head.
truck head are you talking about the new big runner head.
wait a minute you seem to be saying you can't run big runner heads
on a GEN 1 its somehow not fare lol.
There is nothing but cubic inch limits in dirt track racing, drag racing,
road racing, the LS engines have been around now for a lot of yrs
NOBODY uses the LS engine it is simply not competitive in power
with the GEN 1 there is nothing but low runner factory style heads no form of raised runner heads it no canted valve stuff nothing yet available that can make it a competitive engine.
The block if you call world or dart they will tell you that just there standard steel cap blocks will handle 1200 hp.
Dart makes Compacted Graphite blocks that they claim has double the strength of there standard block i'm sure its expensive but at least its available there is no compacted graphite blocks for the LS the engine
is a SLUG not being used in racing not competitive.
A big block you can build so many cubes in it with just cheap iron heads
or the aluminum is not much more, by the time you get the kind of power out a punny small block of any type you will have a fortune in the engine and it will never be as reliable the punny engine will be winding silly rpms to even try to keep up.







