exhaust's control valve?
would this thing work?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/APX-155-A019/
anything cheaper from other brands?
this the video of my car
2,5" system , 2,5" magnaflows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2D7cABytzg
Last edited by elle88; Mar 16, 2010 at 02:48 AM.
but my intentions was to reduce the noise only when driving in town and i don't want to replace my magnaflows
the exhaust valves i talk about are not meant to divert the flow to the muffler or not (cutouts) but act about like the butterfly valves of the exhausts that the C6 z06 has, for example.
here is a video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g366i...eature=related
Something like these might work.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/PYE-MVR200S/





Last edited by gkull; Mar 18, 2010 at 11:30 AM.
Of course you can choose how to divert your own exhaust, but if the existing Magnaflow mufflers are not quiet enough, you will need additional noise suppressors to achieve that. There isn't that much room under the car for additional mufflers. Then there is the weight penalty of additional hardware, and the resultant power loss by restricting the exhaust more.
Your best option is to replace the existing mufflers with ones that are quieter, like the reverse flow Turbo mufflers. But they do drop power.
If you incorporate the exhaust valve in the system, you can have it setup to direct exhaust through the muffled system when in the city, and then direct it through to open side pipes when you want to wake the dead under full throttle
Best option in my opinion.One thing to consider though, is change in AFR (carby tune) under the 2 different modes. The modern cars have a computer to make fine tuning changes in real time... whereas with your engine you will need to make a compromise in tune to accomodate both exhaust modes.
I like the idea of a dual mode exhaust...
sincerely I wanted an easy fix , without replacing mufflers and so on...
so do you think this will not work?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Electric-Exhau...item439d8fea75
it's in UK and I could receive it in few days. basically it works as an exhausts variable restriction (not an exhaust's diverter-cutout)
i found this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMcHI...eature=related
the valve seems to reduce mainly the low tones of the exhausts
Last edited by elle88; Mar 17, 2010 at 12:01 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
bought yesterday a pair car chemistry exhaust's inserts.
need some advises.
of course they are restrictive , but need to quiet down the engine. i think i'll cut away 1 of the 3 baffles and so use 2 only. but where to place the insert? CC says best place for noise reduction is immediately after the collectors, but i suppose that this is the worst place for an exhausts restriction. the easiest place for me would be immediately before mufflers : i suppose there the gases pressure would be somewhat reduced so less backpressure. am i wrong?





I saw the Summit valve and it states:
These ECVs from A'PEXi were created as alternatives to the standard silencers typically fitted in the tips of performance exhaust systems to lower the sound output. The ECVs (Exhaust Control Valve) are spring-loaded butterfly valves that can be installed to the main piping of an existing exhaust system. The angle of the valves can be modified on the fly from within the cockpit to provide complete control over exhaust decibel output
But - the casing does not look very substantial. The manual operation could be a good thing... ?
I did find these:
http://autospeed.com/cms/title_Pure-...3/article.html
They are SS flap with a cast alloy housing - vaccum operated. They open to 90 degress and will never fully close for safety.
I was looking for more of a diverter valve... but also thinking that even if well designed, turbulance may still be an issue. ....and - how much 'bypass' pipe and muffler could I route and still tie back into the factory side exhaust.
The other alternative would be dual exhaust out the back and still maintain the factory side exhausts - but I still cannot come to grips with that - kinda cheesy.
I wonder what the true reduction in performance would be for a carbureted, hydraulic roller cammed 427 (505hp). Would you really see any performance issues if you wanted to putt around instead with the capability of listening to some tunes.
Last edited by kaiserbud; Apr 1, 2011 at 06:28 PM.







