rear end





Last edited by 63mako; Mar 30, 2010 at 12:14 PM.
So when you "fixed it" did you just put new c-clips on, or did you replace the stub axles and realign the rear?
:
So when you "fixed it" did you just put new c-clips on, or did you replace the stub axles and realign the rear?
:ding ding ding!
They WERE able to get an alignment on it with the chewed up yoke....but the wheel would not stay aligned in curves because of all the play....
so... several months later when I could afford it (15 years ago) I pulled the rear and fixed it, put it back together, no more boat....
Like I said, unless the wheel is off the ground or slamming into something laterally, that stub axle will remain loaded inward. Period.
Did you verify they set the camber correctly? Did you make sure your strut rods were secure?
so... several months later when I could afford it (15 years ago) I pulled the rear and fixed it, put it back together, no more boat....
So please explain how there's many documented examples of Corvettes running around with NO c-clips in place and they have NO camber changes?
How come a 3D analysis of the suspension geometry confirms that the yokes are always loaded inwards?
Better yet, why am I getting sucked into this futile debate again?
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
when the vet sat, yes it was aligned properly, just as you say... agree...but when in a high g force to the right or left, the wheel would pull out as the car leaned, and thus loose its alignment, causing a boat effect...it was the same as lifting that wheel off the ground a little, just as you explain...
and the yoke and c-clip were the only things that needed to be replaced....
The yokes are loaded inwards, unless in a strong lateral force, then the opposite outer side wheel is no longer loaded downward but rather dragged outward...
Last edited by pauldana; Mar 30, 2010 at 02:29 PM.
As the lateral force increases, so does the downward force on the tire as the car leans. The net effect increases the inward pressure on the yoke, not decreases.
As the lateral force increases, so does the downward force on the tire as the car leans. The net effect increases the inward pressure on the yoke, not decreases.
I am going home tonight, getting under the car and taking a good look at the geometry of the whole thing...I could be wrong, but I don't think so at this time....
you state, that when the car is jacked up the wheel will pull from its axal? correct?.... so, in a lateral lean, say to the left turn, the right tire will be hard in, but the left tire will be loosing weight, thus pulling outwards... why would this not be correct?....
i am truly open to input... thx, p
on a ps... just went out back. i have a complete C4 IRS sitting on the ground... loosened a u-joint u bolt to try and simulate my idea of lean, got several students to put a simulated lateral lean on the IRS and sure enough the outer wheel pulled outward, just as i have stated....
Last edited by pauldana; Mar 30, 2010 at 04:27 PM.





thanks, bob
Edit: Just looked up your profile. Your car is a 1978. That explains a lot. I believe the 1978, 1979 cars had defective, improperly hardened side yokes from the factory. They were very soft and wore down much quicker than the previous C3-C2 side yokes. Replace them.
Last edited by 63mako; Mar 30, 2010 at 04:35 PM.
I guess you're not a physics, engineering or geometry major are you?
I guess you're not a physics, engineering or geometry major are you?
have a General contractors license also, along with a Pilots license...
I currently teach Computer graphics at a local high school, and have been building and modifying cars since I was 14yo, started on my first CJ5.... I have also taught several years of auto shop.....So, yes i have the capability to understand:-)
I will go home tonight, jack up the rear of my C3 and take a closer look....
but, anytime you put more force on one side the other will have an equal but opposing force... 1 pulling, one pushing....
ps.... my spelling sucks though!!! p:-)










