C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

81 performance gear ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2010, 01:57 PM
  #1  
billlee
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
billlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Cabot AR
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 81 performance gear ratio

Can anyone tell me what final gear ratio's were offered in 81, the 2.72 for the manual trans, and a 2.87 for the standard auto, but what was the performance ratio offered?
Old 04-17-2010, 02:28 PM
  #2  
81vette
Burning Brakes
 
81vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I believe it was the 3.07
Old 04-17-2010, 02:35 PM
  #3  
Duke94
Le Mans Master
 
Duke94's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2001
Location: Ann Arbor Michigan
Posts: 6,576
Received 257 Likes on 209 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billlee
Can anyone tell me what final gear ratio's were offered in 81, the 2.72 for the manual trans, and a 2.87 for the standard auto, but what was the performance ratio offered?
Good question. All the Corvette referance books I have show the 2 ratios you list along with a G92 Performance Option but they don't say what the ratio is. A few internet sites seem to agree that it is 3.15 but I couldn't find anything "official".

Gary
Old 04-17-2010, 06:02 PM
  #4  
81vette
Burning Brakes
 
81vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

1981 Corvette from Road & Track

Curb Weight................................33 95 lbs
Test Weight................................35 90 lbs
Weight Dist (with driver), f/r...........48/52 %
Trans................................... ......4 spd manual, 2.72:1 final ratio
0-60 mph...................................9. 2 sec
Standing 1/4 mi...........................17.0 sec
Speed at 1/4 mi...........................82.0 mph
Stopping Distance from 60 mph......130 ft
Interior noise at 50 mph................73 dba
Lateral Acceleration......................0.790 g
Slalom Speed..............................61.2 mph
Fuel Economy..............................16. 0 mpg


1980 Corvette from Road & Track

Curb Weight................................33 45 lbs
Test Weight................................34 30 lbs
Weight Dist (with driver), f/r...........46/54 %
Trans................................... ......4 spd manual, 3.07:1 final ratio
0-60 mph...................................7. 7 sec
Standing 1/4 mi...........................16.0 sec
Speed at 1/4 mi...........................86.5 mph
Stopping Distance from 60 mph......130 ft
Interior noise at 50 mph................73 dba
Lateral Acceleration......................0.790 g
Slalom Speed..............................61.2 mph
Fuel Economy..............................14. 5 mpg


Mark

Last edited by 81vette; 04-17-2010 at 06:35 PM. Reason: Corrected specs
Old 04-17-2010, 06:05 PM
  #5  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,106
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,314 Posts

Default

The 1981 optional G92 Performance Axle Ratio was 2.87.

G92 was ONLY available with RPOs YF5 (California Emission Equipment) and MX1 (Automatic Transmission). 49 state emission cars came with a 2.72 ratio with the 4 speed and 2.87 ratio with an automatic. Both auto and 4 speed trans Calif emission equiment cars came with the 2.72 ratio, the 2.87 could be ordered with Calif automatic cars. This information is from the 1981 Chevrolet Dealers Order Guide, Corvette page. The Performance Ratio was a $20.00 option and was installed in 2,400 cars.

The 3.07 ratio used in 1980 will work in the 81 Dana rear, but was NEVER offered by Chevrolet in 1981.
Old 04-17-2010, 06:26 PM
  #6  
81vette
Burning Brakes
 
81vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gbvette62
The 1981 optional G92 Performance Axle Ratio was 2.87.

G92 was ONLY available with RPOs YF5 (California Emission Equipment) and MX1 (Automatic Transmission). 49 state emission cars came with a 2.72 ratio with the 4 speed and 2.87 ratio with an automatic. Both auto and 4 speed trans Calif emission equiment cars came with the 2.72 ratio, the 2.87 could be ordered with Calif automatic cars. This information is from the 1981 Chevrolet Dealers Order Guide, Corvette page. The Performance Ratio was a $20.00 option and was installed in 2,400 cars.

The 3.07 ratio used in 1980 will work in the 81 Dana rear, but was NEVER offered by Chevrolet in 1981.

After reading your reply I realized that I have heard this before. I went back to my Road & Track which is a special issue that contains various articles from Road & Track over the years on Corvettes. I started looking at the 1980 and 1981 spec sheets and realized that they had switched the specs in the two articles. They don't have the car year on the spec sheet, so you can't tell by looking for a title. The give away was the pricing for the two cars on the spec sheet which was also referenced in both articles. Anyway, you are correct.... the performance ratio was a 2.87.

I've corrected my earlier post.


Mark

Last edited by 81vette; 04-17-2010 at 06:36 PM.
Old 04-17-2010, 06:50 PM
  #7  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,106
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,314 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 81vette
I just found my old Road & Track on the 1981 Corvette, and it say's a 3:07 in the spec sheet.

Trans................................... ......4 spd manual, 3.07:1 final ratio

Mark
That Road & Track info would have been taken from the Chevrolet Long Lead Press Preview, which would have taken place in the spring of 1980. Chevrolet MAY have planned to offer the 3.07 ratio as an option for 81, but that never happened. June 1980 Corvette Parts Books list the 3.07 for 80 & 81, but September 81 books only list the 2.72 and 2.87 rears.

I have a Chevrolet "Inter-Organization Letter" dated April 28, 1980 and titled "1981 Plan Book - Corvette Coverage Revision". It states the following: "Rear axle ratios changed to 2.72:1 with manual transmission and 2.87:1 with automatic. Previous ratio was 3.07:1 for both applications".

Another 1981 Corvette Plan Book Inter-Organizational Letter I have, this one dated September 23, 1980, states "California Rear Axle Ratio For Automatic Transmission Changed To 2.72:1. 2.87:1 Ratio Retained As Performance Ratio".

The actual "1981 Corvette Plan Book", dated 9-15-80 and marked "GM Confidential", "Chevrolet Motor Division", "1981 Corvette" and headed "Product Program" has the following information on page A2. It says: "New 2.72:1 axle ratio to be used with the 4-speed manual transmission in all 50 states and the automatic in California. The 2.87:1 ratio to be used with the automatic federally and as a performance ratio with the automatic in California".

The "1981 Corvette Plan Book" makes repeated mention of the "Gas Guzzler Tax". Most of the changes made to the Corvette in 1981 were made in an effort to avoid the tax. This is probably why the 3.07:1 was dropped.
Old 04-17-2010, 06:54 PM
  #8  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,106
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,314 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 81vette
After reading your reply I realized that I have heard this before. I went back to my Road & Track which is a special issue that contains various articles from Road & Track over the years on Corvettes. I started looking at the 1980 and 1981 spec sheets and realized that they had switched the specs in the two articles. They don't have the car year on the spec sheet, so you can't tell by looking for a title. The give away was the pricing for the two cars on the spec sheet which was also referenced in both articles. Anyway, you are correct.... the performance ratio was a 2.87.

I've corrected my earlier post.


Mark
Sorry, you updated your post quicker than I was able to locate (and type) the additional information I just posted.

The important thing is that the correct information has been posted!
Old 04-17-2010, 06:58 PM
  #9  
81vette
Burning Brakes
 
81vette's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 1999
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gbvette62
That Road & Track info would have been taken from the Chevrolet Long Lead Press Preview, which would have taken place in the spring of 1980. Chevrolet MAY have planned to offer the 3.07 ratio as an option for 81, but that never happened. June 1980 Corvette Parts Books list the 3.07 for 80 & 81, but September 81 books only list the 2.72 and 2.87 rears.

I have a Chevrolet "Inter-Organization Letter" dated April 28, 1980 and titled "1981 Plan Book - Corvette Coverage Revision". It states the following: "Rear axle ratios changed to 2.72:1 with manual transmission and 2.87:1 with automatic. Previous ratio was 3.07:1 for both applications".

Another 1981 Corvette Plan Book Inter-Organizational Letter I have, this one dated September 23, 1980, states "California Rear Axle Ratio For Automatic Transmission Changed To 2.72:1. 2.87:1 Ratio Retained As Performance Ratio".

The actual "1981 Corvette Plan Book", dated 9-15-80 and marked "GM Confidential", "Chevrolet Motor Division", "1981 Corvette" and headed "Product Program" has the following information on page A2. It says: "New 2.72:1 axle ratio to be used with the 4-speed manual transmission in all 50 states and the automatic in California. The 2.87:1 ratio to be used with the automatic federally and as a performance ratio with the automatic in California".

The "1981 Corvette Plan Book" makes repeated mention of the "Gas Guzzler Tax". Most of the changes made to the Corvette in 1981 were made in an effort to avoid the tax. This is probably why the 3.07:1 was dropped.

Good info.

Mark
Old 04-18-2010, 02:05 PM
  #10  
billlee
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
billlee's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2009
Location: Cabot AR
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default thanks

Thanks for all the information guys, Am I reading it correctly that the 2.87 was only offered for the CA auto cars?
Old 04-18-2010, 04:37 PM
  #11  
gbvette62
Race Director
 
gbvette62's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2000
Location: Shamong, NJ
Posts: 11,106
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,314 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by billlee
Thanks for all the information guys, Am I reading it correctly that the 2.87 was only offered for the CA auto cars?
The 2.87 was the only optional rear and it was only available on California cars with auto. The standard rear in CA was the 2.72 with the auto.

The 2.87 was already standard with automatic cars sold everywere but CA.
Old 04-18-2010, 07:44 PM
  #12  
larryg3
Drifting
Support Corvetteforum!
 
larryg3's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2008
Location: Antioch IL
Posts: 1,989
Received 53 Likes on 36 Posts

Default

gbvette62 is right on the money. I had mine changed from the stock 2.87 (verified with my build sheet) to a 3.54, and boy did that really wake up the car!!
Old 03-17-2019, 06:37 PM
  #13  
foundvettelifeisgood
Melting Slicks
Support Corvetteforum!
 
foundvettelifeisgood's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2001
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 2,087
Received 183 Likes on 86 Posts

Default Great Thread

Originally Posted by gbvette62
That Road & Track info would have been taken from the Chevrolet Long Lead Press Preview, which would have taken place in the spring of 1980. Chevrolet MAY have planned to offer the 3.07 ratio as an option for 81, but that never happened. June 1980 Corvette Parts Books list the 3.07 for 80 & 81, but September 81 books only list the 2.72 and 2.87 rears.

I have a Chevrolet "Inter-Organization Letter" dated April 28, 1980 and titled "1981 Plan Book - Corvette Coverage Revision". It states the following: "Rear axle ratios changed to 2.72:1 with manual transmission and 2.87:1 with automatic. Previous ratio was 3.07:1 for both applications".

Another 1981 Corvette Plan Book Inter-Organizational Letter I have, this one dated September 23, 1980, states "California Rear Axle Ratio For Automatic Transmission Changed To 2.72:1. 2.87:1 Ratio Retained As Performance Ratio".

The actual "1981 Corvette Plan Book", dated 9-15-80 and marked "GM Confidential", "Chevrolet Motor Division", "1981 Corvette" and headed "Product Program" has the following information on page A2. It says: "New 2.72:1 axle ratio to be used with the 4-speed manual transmission in all 50 states and the automatic in California. The 2.87:1 ratio to be used with the automatic federally and as a performance ratio with the automatic in California".

The "1981 Corvette Plan Book" makes repeated mention of the "Gas Guzzler Tax". Most of the changes made to the Corvette in 1981 were made in an effort to avoid the tax. This is probably why the 3.07:1 was dropped.
This morning, before finding this great old post, I took a ride to determine my axle ratio, logging RPM at various speeds from 50 to 75. I have a 4 speed 81 and the math confirms the 2.72 axle ratio...


Get notified of new replies

To 81 performance gear ratio




Quick Reply: 81 performance gear ratio



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.