When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
if i remember correctly, the l-82 used the 350-350 hp cam. which was not a bad cam ,but i think they retarded the cam for emissions, any one remember how much? and also was the retard in the cam or the timing set. alot of confusion about horsepower in those years they went to a different standard i think the n.h.r.a. had a rating on this motor anyone have any thoughts thanks
it used the same part number as the earlier 350/350 and their was only one way to install the cam. Ignition timing/curve was different, lower compression, different carburetor, etc.
if you mean put the back of the cam in the block first then yes, however there is almost an infinite way to "degree in" a cam . thats why adjustable timing chain sets are made. this is how you" tune" for low end or mid range or top end power. you can greatly affect performance by adjusting Cam timing. not to be confused with ignition timing the manufacturers in the 70 s generally retarded the cam timing to help with emissions. i had a new 78 l-82 and we advanced the cam and picked up 3 tenths in the 1/4 mile , i just dont remember how many degrees we advanced it i think it was 4 but im not certain.but we just put it back as it should have been. anyone else
I hot rodded my brand new 79 l-82. The cam is an old design with tiny lobes and very little lift. I originaly installed a Crane Power Max 272 cam with 1.6 roller tip rockers. It helps build compression on the stock l-82. The heads really hold it back
you must be kidding , they retarded the cam to help with emissions. chain stretch had nothing to do with it . if the chain stretched at all it would retard the timing even more totally killing power.