When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Have a 406sbc, rpm performer rpm top end kit, block decked, forged rotating assembly, 6" rods, dish pistons {might want giggle juice later} heads are 64cc, would changing heads to afr's be worth the $$, street machine, already has gobs of torque.
I really don't follow the mindless sheep on products that just because they have a better advertisement campaign claiming to be the best thing since sliced bread.
Yes, I do believe that AFR did their home work on high flow for a given cc of port volume. But they also have some very negative aspects. spark plug location.....lack of oil return............valve covers and valve stem seals swimming in oil
All kind of things that they knew about 10 years ago and they don't care because the mindless public touts them as the best.
Higher CFM heads will give your motor a higher average HP across the rpm range. But you have to figure out cost per HP
I installed a pair of AFR 180's on my 355. Did I pay too much? Who knows. They do work as advertised with no oiling problems. I'm not nor do I pretend to be an expert on engines. I know what worked for my combo and that's it. AFR makes a good product. So does, Brodix, Dart, Edelbrock and a ton of head rebuilders. It's a matter of choice. I agree with GKull, the more air in for your combo the better.
Have a 406sbc, rpm performer rpm top end kit, block decked, forged rotating assembly, 6" rods, dish pistons {might want giggle juice later} heads are 64cc, would changing heads to afr's be worth the $$, street machine, already has gobs of torque.
We use a lot of the AFR heads and had very good dyno results using them and we have used some Darts as well and I would also look at the Profiler heads as well as I have seen on different forums where they seem to work very good and are priced right as well.
The Edelbrock RPM heads are good on a street 350 max 6000 rpm. 170cc runners. Way to small for a 406. If you don't want AFR, look at Brodix or Dart. Even the Edelbrock Victor JR heads would breathe better on this application.
I have edelbrockrpm, 64cc cast#608999. thry produce good velocity and a street car.
The Edelbrock flow numbers are very poor even for 350 ci motors. those are only marginally better than stock 2.02/1.60's Your 406 would really wake up with heads that flow over 300 cfm
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by gkull
The Edelbrock flow numbers are very poor even for 350 ci motors. those are only marginally better than stock 2.02/1.60's Your 406 would really wake up with heads that flow over 300 cfm
That is how our dyno at the shop is set up. Just roll it into place and open the door for the exhaust. Everything out in the open. That is how I got my leg bone shattered right below my knee cap when that sorry *** British Jaguar damper broke into three pieces
The Edelbrock flow numbers are very poor even for 350 ci motors. those are only marginally better than stock 2.02/1.60's Your 406 would really wake up with heads that flow over 300 cfm
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by gkull
That is how our dyno at the shop is set up. Just roll it into place and open the door for the exhaust. Everything out in the open. That is how I got my leg bone shattered right below my knee cap when that sorry *** British Jaguar damper broke into three pieces
That was a waterbrake dyno and yes the operator or anyone watching could get injured. My friends dyno is setup the same way, sitting out in the open, it is state of the art dyno though. They used to have a dyno room/cell at their old shop but I suppose since nothing drastic ever happened they decided not to build a room in their new shop.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Originally Posted by pauldana
im making 440hp at the rear wheels (383) on a set of World SportsmanII's that have been ported polished and port-matched....
so... World.... take a look at what they have.... good price, good selection, good product.
Sportsman II heads are often overlooked. They are great heads, I made 300RWHP with my 355ci L48 with those heads. I like them they will support 500HP out of the box and they are not expensive but have gone up considerably since I bought a set over 10 years ago
im making 440hp at the rear wheels (383) on a set of World SportsmanII's that have been ported polished and port-matched....
so... World.... take a look at what they have.... good price, good selection, good product.
From the World products site. world do not flow very well either for a 200cc head. P&P might be worth an additional 10-15 cfm. Also some companies use a bigger bore size like 4.125 and exhaust test pipes to inflate their claimed flow rates.
The Rule on heads is: No matter what CC or who ported or designed them, the ultimate limitation is the valve sizes. 2.02 inch intake is just too small. The heads flowing over 300 are 2.08 or 2.10 inches
HEAD FLOW @ .600 LIFT
245 intake, 165 exhaust (Super Flow 1050)
260 intake, 176 exhaust (Super Flow 600)
All heads flowed with a standard .750" intake plate, without exhaust tube, and 28" of water.
From the World products site. world do not flow very either for a 200cc head. P&P might be worth an additional 10-15 cfm. Also some companies use a bigger bore size like 4.125 and exhaust test pipes to inflate their claimed flow rates.
The Rule on heads is: No matter what CC or who ported or designed them, the ultimate limitation is the valve sizes. 2.02 inch intake is just too small. The heads flowing over 300 are 2.08 or 2.10 inches
HEAD FLOW @ .600 LIFT
245 intake, 165 exhaust (Super Flow 1050)
260 intake, 176 exhaust (Super Flow 600)
All heads flowed with a standard .750" intake plate, without exhaust tube, and 28" of water.
I was TOLD, after the porting i am right at 300 on intake... and they clam that the world heads have a lot of meat on them to port, they also said that they can make the sportsman II's flow much better than they can make an Edelbrock RPM heads flow... This is there clams, not mine... but my HP seems to go along with this.... the guys name was Toby....
But that being said George, you are by far a greater expert in this area than I..Hands down.. I am just relaying what i was told... and the results...
Last edited by pauldana; Dec 10, 2010 at 06:13 PM.
I was TOLD, after the porting i am right at 300 on intake... and they clam that the world heads have a lot of meat on them to port, the also said that they can make the sportsman II's flow much better than they cam make an Edelbrock RPM head flow... This is there clams, not mine... but my HP seems to go along with this.... the guys name was Toby....
But that being said George, you are by far a greater expert in this area than I..Hands down.. I am just relaying what i was told... and the results...
Paul, valley head service is one of the best. Our shop has sent heads to them because they can do the total CNC port machining. You probably got 2.055 intakes.............. so they are not remotely like the out of the box. Your 440 rwhp shows that some good is going on with your engine.
I was TOLD, after the porting i am right at 300 on intake... and they clam that the world heads have a lot of meat on them to port, they also said that they can make the sportsman II's flow much better than they can make an Edelbrock RPM heads flow... This is there clams, not mine... but my HP seems to go along with this.... the guys name was Toby....
But that being said George, you are by far a greater expert in this area than I..Hands down.. I am just relaying what i was told... and the results...
so are u guys telling me that my 202 valves are to small, remeber i am not looking for the best et avalible but a strong street car.