When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a built 454 with Brodix aluminum heads,big rectangular ports.I'm running thru stock manifolds ,I have an xpipe and 2-1/2 magnaflow mufflers.I'm running a Holly 750 HP carb thru a factory ls-6 intake (low Rise).I wonder how much power I'll realize if I put Hooker super-comp headers on this combo?I realize the rectanguar 71 exaust tips are bottle neck as is the low profile intake,anybody try this?Thanks
Yes...DEFINITELY change to headers....you are leaving 30-50hp or more on the table depending on the engine build. There are two sets of Hooker SCs. One is 1 7/8"x3" and the other is 2 1/8"x3.5". Unless you are running 496" or larger, stick with the 1 7/8"x3"s. Try to keep the rest of the system as smooth as possible, preferably mandrel bent. You can mod the 71 squar tips for 3" openings. The rear of the tip is cut off and a 3" section of pipe must be ovaled. Cut the rear of the square out to fit the ovaled pipe. Then tig it all together on the car.
I run 3" mandrel bent, x pipe and aerochamber muffs with modded stock tips. It's worth the effort if you are trying to maximize your power to the wheels.
Yes...DEFINITELY change to headers....you are leaving 30-50hp or more on the table depending on the engine build. There are two sets of Hooker SCs. One is 1 7/8"x3" and the other is 2 1/8"x3.5". Unless you are running 496" or larger, stick with the 1 7/8"x3"s. Try to keep the rest of the system as smooth as possible, preferably mandrel bent. You can mod the 71 squar tips for 3" openings. The rear of the tip is cut off and a 3" section of pipe must be ovaled. Cut the rear of the square out to fit the ovaled pipe. Then tig it all together on the car.
I run 3" mandrel bent, x pipe and aerochamber muffs with modded stock tips. It's worth the effort if you are trying to maximize your power to the wheels.
Since you spent the $$$ to get good heads that flow well it would be silly to lose that much power by restricting the exhaust flow. You'll definitely feel the difference.
ajrothm, That exhaust looks the business! When I get back to Houston late n the year I need to check that out. I am running MacJacks shorties with a chambered exhaust. On the engine dyno my 489 dynoed at 511 with long tube headers vs the shorties at 496hp. That might give you an idea Pwain.
The 569 intake is your limiting factor, it is all done at 6300 rpm, you need some low end, cam choice is critical. The problem is the heads are high rpm and the intake is low rpm