Dumb bearing question



Yes Plasti-Gauge is the accurate way to measure main bearing clearance, but u should measure journal taper too - and with the correct tool.

Sounds like your going with your old iron - cool.
At least u know u have a good block.Hope this helps Mr. BV,
cardo0
Had a guy for a while who over torqed his mic and left every journal a few tenths to bib. He also dressed his stone with a slight slope that went into the journal at the same amount of slope. He's gone now.
I'll measure it with the set of standard bearings i have here and see what it comes up with.
Cardo,
Yes, i will be putting together my old block. I had my 400 checked out yesterday with a torque plate. The bores were all over the place. If they had to hone it to get it round i would have ended up with .008 clearance on the pistons.
This is not what i had in mind, but i want an engine in the car asap. The least expensive option was this. I'll have to put my old pistons and rings back in the bores. Bit dodgy as she already has slight ridge. Hopefully with the old rings she'll be fine and the rings won't hang up on the ridge.
Mean time i'll save up for the new block and build my favorite combo again.
Blockman,
I checked the main alignment best as i could, with a straight edge. Looks ok.


But in the OEM overhaul manuals they detail removing the ridge, just ball honing and reusing the pistons if clearance is something less than 0.006". I can't recall the clearance spec for TRW pistons. Yes my 1994 GEN II LT1 overhaul manual says that even for reusing the stock hypereutechtic pistons - but the clearance is a little less. OK, OK, use your bore gauge all u want (though i know a quicker method
).My next suggestion would be replace the rings - thats what they make ring land cleaning tools for. And i believe u can even purchase some larger ring sets that make up some wear clearance too but maybe not for every piston.
I do recommend replacing the rings.TRW pistons are cheap. So if u want to change your c.r. this is the time. But we don't know what heads u plan on.
BTW u could have your 400" block sonic tested and it may be usable at 0.040" over - of course with new pistons. And a little block filler will help secure the bores at the base.
Sounds like a great plan, and u will always a spare motor too,
cardo0
Main bearings clearance is measured installed with a bore gauge. Rod bearings are measured the same way, using a rod vise. Cranks are mic'd. That's the only accurate way to measure main bearing clearance. If the correct bearing crush isn't attained, measuring the bore ID will show this quickly.
Here's an article where tested back to back, Plastigauge was off by .0016!
http://www.carcraft.com/techfaq/116_...r/viewall.html
Main bearings clearance is measured installed with a bore gauge. Rod bearings are measured the same way, using a rod vise. Cranks are mic'd. That's the only accurate way to measure main bearing clearance. If the correct bearing crush isn't attained, measuring the bore ID will show this quickly.
Here's an article where tested back to back, Plastigauge was off by .0016!
http://www.carcraft.com/techfaq/116_...r/viewall.html
Go back and look at the junk bore gauge they are using!! You can not measure an out of round housing bore as rod bearings have eccentricity build into them. Using a ridgid finger bore gauge is not going to give a true reading as I have proved this many times to other engine builders. Alot of guys are suprised and didn't have a clue what was really going on and why the differance between the 2 gauges!!!
Example take a ridgid finger bore gauge and slide a .0002 feeler gauge (per say) under each finger and it will change the reading on the gauge, Now take a bore gauge like a Sunnen bore with floating fingers and put the same feeler gauges under the floating fingers and you will see the gauge will not change!!!!
Those cheap bore gauges work good for round bores but not for checking bearing clearances.
Its amazing how many guys don't understand the way a bore gauge works, Just ask the guys who work at Mahle who own F/M and clevite bearings what bore gauge should be used when checking bearing clearancesHMMMMMMM
Last edited by BLOCKMAN; Sep 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
MItutoya has some good bore gauges! As long as its not like the one in the car craft article you should be fine. Like I said they are good for measuring round bores not for checking bearing clearances.


Ya, i read that Car Crap article. When i saw him using the wrong type of mic to measure journal size i could tell he was an amature playing blueprinting expert. Has anyone ever meet an mag rag publisher? I have, at Pamona swap meet and car show one year and he had a nice imitation Judge GTO. But he was a journalist - not a machinist.
cardo0
With standard size bearings installed, the bore measures 2.452 (rounded off) and clearance is way to much at .0036".
With the bearings that came out of it in, the size of the bore is 62.23 mm and the clearance .0020.
I think i need a bearing that is .0012 smaller in installed diameter (oversize) to the standard one. If i would use the H-bearings which is the correct partnumber for these ?
With standard size bearings installed, the bore measures 2.452 (rounded off) and clearance is way to much at .0036".
With the bearings that came out of it in, the size of the bore is 62.23 mm and the clearance .0020.
I think i need a bearing that is .0012 smaller in installed diameter (oversize) to the standard one. If i would use the H-bearings which is the correct partnumber for these ?
What block are you talking about!!!!
I'm working on my old 350 (4" bore block) and putting that back together to get my ride up and running again.













