Stupid question:



Offhand, I would guess that a lighter fuel pump pushrod wouldn't really be worth a whole lot, as far as freeing up extra power. I would enjoy hearing from someone who knows what they're talking about, who could square me and daanbc away on this issue, or non-issue, whichever the case may be.
Keep the shiny side up!

Scott





Scottyp99, "They" say that a "lighter" pushrod does not have the "float" so it delivers better performance. My thinking is = when ever I install these push rods, there is never any play in them. So how much "float" could there be?



What is the context of your quote from the Chevy Power service manual (or, the CPSM, for short
)? Are they talking about re-using lifters in an engine overhaul using the original cam, or re-using them on a new cam? Not trying to argue with you, just trying to clarify.Just FYI, the IBPTBDVMT says you should always use new lifters with a new cam, but they also say you can tune a piano, but you can't tune a fish, so maybe it should be taken with a grain of salt. And if there is any salt left over, can I have some for my popcorn?

Keep the shiny side up!

Scott
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts


But an inspection is minimum for any used or even new part.
IMHO i would give the old p-rod a visual for scoring/abuse. Then I would install and try and wobble it in place. I recall mine in my Hecho in Mehico crate with <35k mi had zero play. Anything more the minutest play while i the bore i would look to replace with new and try again to compare. And it could be the bore hole in the block is worn as that's the softer metal.
Hope this can help,
cardo0
But an inspection is minimum for any used or even new part.
IMHO i would give the old p-rod a visual for scoring/abuse. Then I would install and try and wobble it in place. I recall mine in my Hecho in Mehico crate with <35k mi had zero play. Anything more the minutest play while i the bore i would look to replace with new and try again to compare. And it could be the bore hole in the block is worn as that's the softer metal.
Hope this can help,
cardo0

Just for people to know it is the hard parts that wear more than a soft part. The reasons for the crazy sounding thing is the soft part embeds dirt and such and acts as a file on the hard parts!





Quote: Good used lifters that still retain some crown or convex curvature across the bottom are very satisfactory.
I am sure this quote was taken out of context. If your not changing out the cam you can reuse the lifters if they and the lobes on the cam show no visible wear and they are used in the exact same bores they were removed from. This would be the only case. A new cam install requires new lifters. Period, end of story.







I'm getting the Comp.Cam XE268H (12-242-12)
Crane-Anti-pump-up Lifters.
Cloyes 9-1100T timing chain.
A 8 lb chrome/polished water pump.
The "famous" fuel push rod.
And thinking of getting a Lifter Valley baffle tray.
I already have a Weiand polished "street warrior"
Quadrajet tuned.
Distrib. done by "LARS"
Long tube headers into true dual exhast w/Flow master 44's.
Under drive pulleys.
Dual L-82 intake with a "EXTREME" cover.
Trans-Pak in the tranny.
All emission equipment removed.
With what I have done so far, the car is a totally different vehicle from when I first brought it home. The addition of the cam I'm thinking will perk it up just a little.
Thank you to ALL FORUM members who have helped me and gave advise over this past 18 Months. I appreciate it very much!!!!






Obviously, if I bought an aftermarket cam and the manufacturer said I must use their lifters or their warranty is VOID, I would follow their advise. DUH
But in my 44 years of building Chevy V8's, I didn't always have new aftermarket speed equipment in my budget. I bought a hundred times more stuff over the Chevy parts counter. And I put those parts together myself using the tips and techniques learned from reading books like the Chevy Power Manual and those of Henry 'Smokey' Yunick and Bill 'Grumpy' Jenkins.
What is the overwhelming suggestion from reading these pages? Order a crate engine then write the BIG check. Sure, that's the quick and easy way. But not for me.
Did I ever put 600 grit abrasive paper to the face of a lifter? Absolutely. Did I ever reuse lifters that had the convex bottom needed to insure that the lifters rotate in their bores? Absolutely. And never had a valve train problem by doing so. I'm old. I'm old school. I mostly use old school parts.
The newest ultra high lift cams and sky high valve spring rates need specialized assembly techniques, no doubt about it. If I needed more horsepower than what GM's engineers designed in the late 60's and early 70's, I'd skip right over them and go the roller lifter route. I hear they can be reused without any drama from those know-it-alls at the IBPTBDVMT.
Crane: First sentance in bold red:
http://www.cranecams.com/uploads/instructions/214e.pdf
Lunati:
http://www.lunatipower.com/Tech/Cams/CamLifters.aspx
and:
http://www.holley.com/data/Products/...al/INST150.pdf
Comp:
http://www.compcams.com/Technical/In.../Files/145.pdf


I went through all the trouble of scanning, cropping, photo hosting and posting them to show that I did no such thing.
Your 4 links proved my point that aftermarket camshaft manufacturers ALL require, not only new lifters, but ofttimes THEIR brand of new lifters to keep the warranty intact. I never said otherwise.
I was under the impression that certain cam grinders would grind ANY custom cam profile, for a price. Am I wrong?
"What is the context of your quote from the Chevy Power service manual (or, the CPSM, for short)? Are they talking about re-using lifters in an engine overhaul using the original cam, or re-using them on a new cam? Not trying to argue with you, just trying to clarify."
I just cut-n-pasted it, so you'll have to take my word for it that I haven't modified it in any way. However, anybody who is interested can go take a look at post #9 and see that it has not been edited.
I do appreciate the trouble you went through to answer my question, (thank you, by the way) but really, if you had simply said "The CPSM says it's ok for a new cam.", I would have taken your word for it. I really don't understand what you're getting all bent out of shape about.
Keep the shiny side up

Scott








