C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:01 AM
  #1  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why?

Last year I dyno'ed my 71. The result was a best of 250 rwhp @5000rpm and 295 ft. lbs @3500rpm with the following combo:

355 ci
Approx 9.2:1 c/r
S/R Torquer heads
generic hyd. cam (.480" lift, 292 advertised dur/ 230 @.05, 109 LSA)
Torker II intake
Holley 650 mech. secondaries
Hooker competition headers
2-1/2" exhaust

That first run was pretty good, but lost 20hp by the third run. To make a long story short, I traced the problem to crappy hyd lifters that were bleading down as the oil thinned out from temperature.

To remedy that problem, I replace the hyd cam with a Comp 282S (solid flat tappet .495" lift, 236 dur @.05",110 LSA). I also increased C/R to approx 10.0:1 through the use of steel shim gasket, added comp cams 1.52 roller tip rockers, and did some minor port matching to the intake. Theoretically, this should have improved HP to 275 rwhp at the very least, right?

Wrong!! Todays runs were even more disappointing than last time. I actually lost power and pulled a best of 237 rwhp@5000 rpm and 293 ft. lbs @3200 rpm. How is this possible. :confused: :confused: A/F was fairly consistent from 3000-6000rpm at 12:1 - 13:1. There was no valve float,no fuel starvation, cam was degreed when I installed it, total timing of 36* all in by 2500 rpm, and no detectable miss. Everything appears good and the engine runs smooth. In fact, it feels stronger and pulls much harder to redline than the old cam. What am I missing? Any suggestions?

Tom




[Modified by tsw71, 10:36 AM 5/26/2002]
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 04:11 AM
  #2  
Shark Racer's Avatar
Shark Racer
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 12,399
Likes: 247
From: San Jose CA
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Kind of dumb of me to ask this now, but did you check your throttle actuation before you put the car up on the dyno?.
-Steve
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 07:40 AM
  #3  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why?

no points i assume? new wires? cap? 12v to coil?
what size runners in the torquer II?
Have u checked back pressure ahead of muffler?
carb checked and is WOT?
valves not too tight?
was the cam degreed?
valve springs at least 105# seat?
plugs clean?
compression at least 175?
30psi in tires?





[Modified by drives61, 6:58 AM 5/26/2002]
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 09:09 AM
  #4  
DeenHylton's Avatar
DeenHylton
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Prineville Oregon
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Most articles I've read including the manual I received when I installed my Holley heads/cam/intake state to run no more than 34* total advance on todays premium fuel. Also if I read your posting right you went from a 230 degree cam @ .050 (hydraulic) to a 234 degree cam @ .050 (solid)...you ended up actually going DOWN in cam size. It takes on the average of a ten degree increase in duration to remain the same when going from a hydraulic to a solid cam, in other words you lose ten degrees in timing in valve lash on your solid cam. Deen
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 12:33 PM
  #5  
Chuck Harmon's Avatar
Chuck Harmon
Melting Slicks
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,286
Likes: 8
From: San Jose California
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Tom,

I still think it the problem will turn out to be something simple. It sure looked good doing it and sounded very strong!

Chuck
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 12:44 PM
  #6  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

Drives61, Thanks for the input. Here's what i've got so far.


no points i assume? new wires? cap? 12v to coil?

Unilite distributor, new taylor wires, new cap and rotor, voltage to coil is good.

what size runners in the torquer II?

I have no idea :D This intake uses stock size gaskets, so runner size is on the small side compared to other single planes.Since the S/R torquer has 170cc runners, I thought this intake would compliment these heads well. Both the intake and heads use somewhat narrow runners to boost port velocity and low end torque, while being large enough to run well up to 6000-6500. I have been discussing this intake with Ganey recently as well as reading mountainmotor's writings about these intakes and am considering switching to Stealth or old style Torker in the future.

Have u checked back pressure ahead of muffler?

No. Please elaborate on this

carb checked and is WOT?

yes

valves not too tight?

Lash is correct. Valvetrain looks good.

was the cam degreed?

I installed it strait up and degreed it to verify both .004" and .05" numbers. All numbers were within 1-2* as is the mfgs expected variation.

valve springs at least 105# seat?

I stuck with the installed S/R Torquer springs which are 100# seat pressure. Should be close enough, right?

plugs clean?

looks good and I have low miles on this set of plugs

compression at least 175?

Last time I checked after cam install, they all ran at about 185

30psi in tires?

38psi (44 is max for these Firestones)

DeenHylton,

Very interesting. This is something I never considered. Time for me to do some reading on this.

Chuck, I sure hope so.

Thanks guys. :cheers: Keep the suggestions coming.
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 01:03 PM
  #7  
73-454's Avatar
73-454
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: Toronto Ontario
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

If you are looking for HP don't waste your time with an old rotten block. Always start with a new GM short block or a complete GM HO engine. Can't build HP by slapping parts toghter.
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 01:04 PM
  #8  
QuickVet's Avatar
QuickVet
Race Director
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,431
Likes: 1
From: CT
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

i know how you feel. everything i have done to my car in the last two years has made it slower :crazy: Im so ready to give up. :smash:
Reply
Corvette Stories

The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts

story-0

8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

 Brett Foote
story-4

Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 26, 2002 | 02:13 PM
  #9  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

tsw71
sounds good.
i am not familiar with the torquerII. My 72 had a holley intake that was too small, that's why i ask. Weiand 8004 plenty big on my 72 now.

Use a vacuum/fuel pump gauge to check exhaust back pressure. Drill a small hole ahead of the muffler (cover later with a hose clamp) Work a length of 3/16 or 1/8 tubing about an inch in. 3-5 feet or more switch to rubber hose, tape gauge to windshield for a quick test on an open road. Need rev-limiter or co-pilot; easy to over rev or hit pole while looking at gauge :yesnod:
2 PSI or less is ideal. 2-4 not so hot, over 5 is awful. Are mufflers new? Any kinked pipes? Any jealous people shove a potato in your tailpipe?

That cam is excellent; the previous cam is too big, for SRT's IMO. Recheck springs; stick a scrap of wood on each one, lean your weight into it; not scientific, but you could find a weak/broken spring that way.

2.02" valves?

Does it pull, on the dyno to 7000? Where does power level off/decline?

I assume a good air filter with a drop base?

What is the plug gap? Try .030"

EDIT: i looked up the 5001, seems it should be OK.


[Modified by drives61, 2:02 PM 5/26/2002]
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:05 PM
  #10  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

drives61, Thanks for the quick reply. The mufflers are only a few years old. They are stock type turbos with 2-1/2" inlet and 2" outlet. The pipes are also 2-1/2" factory style replacement for LT-1 and have no tight turns or kinks.

The valves are 2.02/1.60. Not long ago, there was discussion here on the forum about poor quality springs and dampers on the World Product heads. Many were finding that the dampers were breaking with fairly low miles. What effect would broken spring dampers have on performance and what would be the likely symptoms? As I said before, there is no hint of valve float, so I'm hopefull these springs and dampers are still good enough.

On the street, this motor pulls strong to 5800-6000 through the first 4 gears. I have not wound out 5th(1:1) on the street for obvious reasons. On the dyno, it pulled to 6000 easily, but not quickly. On the second pull, I ran to 6100. More is possible, but not enough confidence in con rods of motor to find out. :eek: Besides, peek appears to be at 5500, so there seem little point in trying. If you have a chance, download the file for my car that Steve(pacinCA) posted here on the C3 forum last night and let me know what you think.

Plug gap was/is .035". Air cleaner is LT-1 drop base with K&N filter.

My 0-60 G-Tech times were disappointing @5.8 sec. I dump the clutch at 3000 and feather to hook up. Low gears and close ratio of tranny should have produced better times IMO. I thought it might be traction causing the slow 0-60 times, but now.............

The dyno's accuracy did come to mind yesterday, but Chucks Z06 ran after me and ran exactly as expected, so that theory went down in flames with my performance numbers :D

Thanks again, Tom
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:13 PM
  #11  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

tsw71
"crappy lifters" lost 20hp? i don't buy it. This incorrect diagnosis is the key to the problem.
What oil? 20w50 is a must.
More likely a faulty coil or dist. that degrades with heat. You won't notice a 20% misfire rate; plugs will look fine. :cheers:
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:39 PM
  #12  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

tsw71
"crappy lifters" lost 20hp? i don't buy it. This incorrect diagnosis is the key to the problem.
What oil? 20w50 is a must.
More likely a faulty coil or dist. that degrades with heat. You won't notice a 20% misfire rate; plugs will look fine. :cheers:
You may be right on the diagnosis. I run sae 30wt with the high volume pump. The 20-50 that i used to run upto a few years ago always took a long time to thin out enough to bring the press guage down from 70# at cruising speed durring warm up. It made me nervous, so I strated using the 30wt.

My diagnosis of the lifters was based on a couple factors. These were anti-pump-ups that I installed many, many years ago when I was young and dumb. I had no idea that they were to be set at zero lash, so they had always been set with 1/4-1/2 turn preload. In the months leading up the last years dyno day, I noticed the valvetrain making lots of noise like that of a solid cam setup. While quiet when cold, it got louder as oil warmed up. I assumed that the thining oil combined with many years of running the lifters improperly caused damage to the valving of the lifters since there was no one bad lifter, but just simply noise coming from the entire valvetrain. Perhaps a thicker oil would have solved the lifter noise, but I have never been satisfied with any setup for too long and it was time for a change, so I made the switch to solids.

I also have since replaced the blue streak coil that was run last time with the MSD blaster that I now run. Your theory could be valid, but thyankfully, that coil is long gone.
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:43 PM
  #13  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Tom
my 2nd choice is springs.
i built my SRT's from bare heads, but the valve job was pre-done.
i had to add .060 shims because the height was wrong, and seat psi was too low.
did you check seat psi, or are you going by the specs?
Dampers eliminate float/ could be the problem if a coil/dist swap does not help. :seeya
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 03:53 PM
  #14  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

is there different symtoms of valve float. I have experience valve float years ago and in that case it killed top end power and simply would not rev. Is it possible to experience valve float and not know it?

And yes, I'm going by the specs listed by World Products




[Modified by tsw71, 11:55 AM 5/26/2002]
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 05:39 PM
  #15  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Tom
float will show up often with a pointy peak on the dyno chart, when the springs give up power spikes down. You could just shim the springs for a quick test with a g-tech. .060" shims ok as long a there is no coil bind.

Your combo should be good for 285-315hp on a dynojet.
Last year there was a c5 guy that got, i think, 240 hp, dealer changed coils, modules, cleaned carbon, etc, then months later they found the problem: Spark plugs!
...............

Better, if you are going to hang out at the dyno, get some AFR or trick flow heads, and sell the SRT's. i spent 30 hours porting mine.
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 05:46 PM
  #16  
A C's Avatar
A C
Le Mans Master
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 6,493
Likes: 6
From: Bloomington MN
Cruise-In II Veteran
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (73-454)

If you are looking for HP don't waste your time with an old rotten block. Always start with a new GM short block or a complete GM HO engine. Can't build HP by slapping parts toghter.

If his motor is an L46, it already has a forged crank, pink rods, and forged pistons. Why would you downgrade to a cast crank, and hypereutectic pistons?

AC
Reply
Old May 26, 2002 | 06:19 PM
  #17  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

Tom
years ago i met CC at the Circle Track Trade Show.
They suggested the 282S for my 61. They gave me a catalog, which i dug up just now, and i had written in 115-120 seat and 300 open, their advice.
Your springs are junk. :cry
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why?

Old May 26, 2002 | 10:15 PM
  #18  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

drives61, I was wrong on the coil voltage. :bb I was running a ballast resistor in series with the factory resistor wire. The result was 7 volts to the + side of coil at an idle and about 9 at higher rpm. I bypassed the additional ballast and now run 9.5v at an idle and 11-11.5v at higher rpm. The Unilite instructions say to run a ballast if voltage at an idle is within 1v of batt voltage. I am substantially lower than that, but would have to eliminate the resistor wire to gain any voltage. Test drive showed no difference. Your thoughts?


Now on to the next test. :smash: stay tuned

Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 08:10 AM
  #19  
Matt Gruber's Avatar
Matt Gruber
Race Director
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Influencer
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,994
Likes: 79
From: central FL, near the beach.
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (tsw71)

tom
i had to bypass the resistor wire on my 72 and use a ballast resistor. Run near the max they allow.
Did you g-tech it? Years ago at the drags i had some ignition problems; i could not tell SOTP a 14.0 from a 15.0 :eek: i had to close the plug gap down to .022(turbocharged 22psi boost 6cyl)

Regardless, those valve springs need to be upgraded. i want 300 RWHP :yesnod:
Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 02:19 PM
  #20  
tsw71's Avatar
tsw71
Thread Starter
Drifting
25 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,395
Likes: 6
From: Indiana
Default Re: Another disappointing dyno run!!! Why? (drives61)

tom
i had to bypass the resistor wire on my 72 and use a ballast resistor. Run near the max they allow.
Did you g-tech it? Years ago at the drags i had some ignition problems; i could not tell SOTP a 14.0 from a 15.0 :eek: i had to close the plug gap down to .022(turbocharged 22psi boost 6cyl)

Regardless, those valve springs need to be upgraded. i want 300 RWHP :yesnod:
Sounds good. I will play with the voltage today. I also am going to follow a hunch and do a leakdown test on the cyliders. I just remembered that I was a little surprised at the amount of slop in the bore. Last time the heads were off, It appeared that there was more movement up and down than there was side to side. Perhaps it's nothing but my imagination, or maybe the cyliders are no longer round. It's hard to tell with forged pistons when they ere cold, and I regret not taking the time to verify the bore with an inside mic. I will also see about getting some shims for the springs. It may be next weekend before I get to that though. I appreciate your advice and hope you will continue to follow this thread for updates.

Thanks, Tom
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:03 AM.

story-0
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
2027 Corvette vs The World: Every C8 vs Its Closest Competitor

Slideshow: 2027 Corvette lineup vs the world.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-24 16:12:42


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Most Common Corvette Problems of the Last 20 Years!

Slideshow: 10 major Corvette problems from the last 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 16:37:05


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 MOST and 5 LEAST Popular Corvette Model Years in History!

Slideshow: 5 most and least popular Corvette model years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-08 13:25:01


VIEW MORE