Help need some tech advice on my 396 build
(not to many)
.
i have a 1969 L71 vert i've had for over 23 yrs when i first saw it it had a tree growing throw it and in lots of boxes...
Now its a runing driving car
non big block....
.


.
.
.
Fast fowards 23 yrs I just bought a cheap parts car (78 corvette)
for the big block it has a 66 chevelle 396 I will be putting in my vert
here are the casting numbers
Can you guys tell me what 396 it is ? 340hp 375hp.?
.

.


.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.



.
the heads had a casting number 3866781.? (E18-74)
1974 113cc?
.
here is a picture of the inside dome pistons hash marks on the cylinder walls
.


.
.
.
looks like a rebuilt .?
.
under side looks clean newer pistons .?
.

.
.
.
now here is it gets diffrent for me
i noticed this ..?
.
.



.
weights .?
balanced assembly.?
.
so my question is were do i go from here.?
Plastic gage the bearing set.?
Hone the cylinder walls throw in a new set of rings.?
Aluminum heads.?
.
.thanks for your imput .......s
.
.
.
.
.
.

It's been ballanced at sometime in the past. Check the bore, it may ave been over bored some already. Clean off the pistons and see if they show an oversize stamped on them.
i will pull the slugs out next after I get a reading on the bearings with
the plasta-gage
would you know right off hand what the troq spec
for the main & rod caps .?
45 lb for rods and
80lb for mains sound right.?....thanks again .....s
.
I did the bearing gage I think they need replacing
.
.

.

.

.
.
cylinders messured 4.09 so that is stock for 396.?
but what I'm wondering is the crankshaft has some spot like it got realy hot in the pictures it around #5 #6.?
should i just throw a set of ring and new bearing and go with it.?
.

.
.
and the numbers on the rods don't match the holes they came out of
I pulled the #3 out of #1 hole there just put in any hole no rime or reason.?
.


.






With all the silicone on the gasket It's been into before. Rods were likely re-sized or replaced during the crank issue so it doesn't really matter where they go except pistons might have got mixed up too. But again, they could have pressed rebuilt rods on old pistons. Are any of the small ends of the rods *blue* looking also? That's usually from a rod heater when they are assembled outside of the factory and doesn't hurt anything.
I'd throw a tack weld on the oil pump pickup tube while I had it apart to make sure it didn't fall off later.
JIM
With all the silicone on the gasket It's been into before. Rods were likely re-sized or replaced during the crank issue so it doesn't really matter where they go except pistons might have got mixed up too. But again, they could have pressed rebuilt rods on old pistons. Are any of the small ends of the rods *blue* looking also? That's usually from a rod heater when they are assembled outside of the factory and doesn't hurt anything.
I'd throw a tack weld on the oil pump pickup tube while I had it apart to make sure it didn't fall off later.
JIM
.
.no the con rods look good ...
no blue-ing ....
only thing is the extra weight added to the #6 con -rod
But it has 31 stamped on it .? wrong hole.?
.
I was going to ask about the oil pump pick up tube
weld it or braze it.?
.
the numbers on the con-rod bearing (clevett) have a date 92
I could try to get a better pictures .?
.
and the pistons have minamal skirt wear and look realy clean
underneith Like there new-ish
.
the motor ran strong ..compression was 170-185
cross hatching looks good rings and oil ring look good No crome ring
Reason I broke this motor down was to fresh'n up
till i saw the miss-holed pistons and the blueing on the crank counter weights
I'm not feeling that warm and fuzzy feeling about this motor.
It does look like it has run for a few miles after it's last rebuild
thank you guys for the response
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
I miked most of the bearing #5#6 & #1#2
and they all seem standard bore but i don't claim to be a machinest (or a great spel'r)
the numbers on the bearing all seem the same
( Clevite 77)
(9 92 )
(CB743P)
( B )
................I can't find were they are stamp {STD} or {10} or {20}
what do you think beside the hot spot It looks stock bore 4.09
bearing too stock...what do you think.?
Last edited by L71Ragtop; Sep 19, 2012 at 11:00 PM. Reason: spelling errors
A little scuffing on the bearing surface. As long as it's that far apart, I'd clean it the best I could and replace the bearings while you're there.
A little scuffing on the bearing surface. As long as it's that far apart, I'd clean it the best I could and replace the bearings while you're there.
very perplexed .??
then it hit me the reason for the weight add is they replaced that rod with another and added weight to make the rotating assmbly ballanced
or that rod or any of those rods would be just as blue as that crank journal
no marking on the bearing but I'm with you definitely been turned
and its a "steel" crank not cast... so the blueing is EZR to sleep with I'm not pushing alot of HP maybe 350 if I'm lucky
.
mic'd the journal it came up just shy 2.089(sorry)
then I spotted this
.


.
Weighted rod #6

.
.
forged Steel Crankshaft .?
.

.
.
.
what grit crocus cloth can i use to clean the journal .?
thanks for the help.....s
.
.





Then he guided me out back and he had a pile of 454 long blocks and he said take your pick. They do a certain amount of GM crate motor swap outs and end up with the rebuildables.
So for basically the same money as a high performance rebuild I did the 4.250 stroker 4340 forged crank with the max bore and got 100 more ci 496 ci
but feedback is very welcome (maybe someone sees something i will miss)
this rebuild is full on ......
.
There was only one place I could get a Rering kit for a 396 with malloy rings for an affordable
is ...summit
and a free hat to boot
.

.
.
had to get a 4.1/2" hone and started to zip the cylinders with a cordless drill & starting fluid for lube
.

.

.

.

.

.
.
checking ring gaps....
thought it was to much... but when i checked the gap on the used ring it was realy close
.

.

.

.
.









