When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The 70's L-82 cams were ground from the factory retarded as installed straight up from the factory, the cam is retarded.
Speaking of asking questions and getting an answer...
There's 3 ways that come to mind that would document the cam installed retarded; either the cam/timing gears were different, or the cam was installed with different-than standard positioning of the cam/crank sprockets. The first two would generate alternate part numbers, the latter would be clearly documented in the factoryservicemanual - fair?I would think anyone making this claim could do a little research and easily and quickly find out how (and if) this was done using standard and readily-available references
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
I am not in IT I actually write software and I can make a stock L48 put out 500 RWHP
Always turns into a pizzing match, between people that know what they are talking about, some that have their own ideas and others that simply don't know too much about dynos ( this is not a put down ) and are asking legitimate questions based on this fact.
My friend owns a 20,000 sq/ft engine shop and has a properly calibrated engine dyno and chassis dyno. He told me he had a Viper day ( Viper club ) and they put thier Vipers on his properly calibrated chassis dyno and he said he never saw so many long faces in his life to to the point where some of them were saying his dyno was no good and not properly calibrated. Now are these guys coming back, no, but he builds engines for serious racing teams and needs to know the real numbers.
Bottom line, never tell a dyno shop how much HP you think your car will make, in almost all cases I have seen this question is asked
Gosh I love dyno threads.... Always a good banter ..
I remember one, if not the first, Post I ever made here was a dyno thread.... I had just picked up my car from a local shop, R&E Racing... They gave me a report that showed something like 550 hp and 500tq at the rear wheels!!! Man was I excited!!! I posted my results.... Lol..... Then gkull and I think 63mako took me to task on the numbers... They were right... Broke my hart... And made me pissed at R&E Racing for the bull.... Went back and then they told me ther dyno was not working right after an AC failure...... Yea, right....
Gosh I love dyno threads.... Always a good banter ..
I remember one, if not the first, Post I ever made here was a dyno thread.... I had just picked up my car from a local shop, R&E Racing... They gave me a report that showed something like 550 hp and 500tq at the rear wheels!!! Man was I excited!!! I posted my results.... Lol..... Then gkull and I think 63mako took me to task on the numbers... They were right... Broke my hart... And made me pissed at R&E Racing for the bull.... Went back and then they told me ther dyno was not working right after an AC failure...... Yea, right....
So........if they are telling the truth, they were charging people full price to run their cars on a dyno that they knew was giving faulty data? That's their exuse? Man, that's even more unethical than running a "happy dyno", in my opinion. Some people try to explain there way out of things, and end up making themselves look even worse. As my Grandpappy used to say, "Scottarino, you'll never get out of a hole by digging it deeper. When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing you need to do is........STOP DIGGING!"
I find that it is actually getting harder to make the "number."
I've been chasing 300 RWHP (dynos show the 280s - 290s) and while I've done mods that theoretically should yield small gains (e.g., Gilmer belt underdrive that CarCraft found 10 hp at 5,500 RPM with on their dyno), I find find less RWHP in the more recent print-outs than before the mods.
I've been told that the software updates are making the legit dynos print lower numbers than in the past, so while there may actually have been an increase in power, it doesn't show up in the printout.
So........if they are telling the truth, they were charging people full price to run their cars on a dyno that they knew was giving faulty data? That's their exuse? Man, that's even more unethical than running a "happy dyno", in my opinion. Some people try to explain there way out of things, and end up making themselves look even worse. As my Grandpappy used to say, "Scottarino, you'll never get out of a hole by digging it deeper. When you find yourself in a hole, the first thing you need to do is........STOP DIGGING!"
Keep the shiny side up!
Scott
yea, I agree....it was R&E Racing Lancaster Ca. stopped going there after that,....and then i found other things later that they also lied about... adjusting my valve train for instance.... I just do it all my self now,,,it's hard to find some one you can trust... and it was not them.
on the digging a hole thing.....Yea, I do that sometimes also... sometimes when your in that hole you dont even know it.... tis life...
ill have some more info after tonight, i am going to the 1/8 mile drag strip here to race my buddys 1984 crossfire vette, ill let yall know what my times are
This is the best thing I've seen yet in this thread. I'm not a fan of dyno racing. Particularly considering all the happy dyno, innaccurate dyno, correction factor etc. issues such as we've heard here. The true test of how a car performs, in terms of acceleration, is how quick can it cover a measured distance, from a standing start.
Good luck at the track. Looking forward to the results.
Actually, the L-48 cam was rated to something under 4K power peak.
The 77 L-48 was rated at 180hp @ 4000pm, 270lb-ft @ 2400.
Shark Racer - I have to admit I was wrong. I looked up 77 L48 specs in some Corvette books I have and they show that the L48 was rated at 180hp at 4,000 rpm. I'm speechless.
Shark Racer - I have to admit I was wrong. I looked up 77 L48 specs in some Corvette books I have and they show that the L48 was rated at 180hp at 4,000 rpm. I'm speechless.
Having owned and driven one as my first car for many years I wasn't surprised. Motor never wanted to rev much past 4500.
I was almost afraid when I did heads/cam to push past 5k. Once I've got this carb dialed in I'm hoping for 6k. lol
The cam is very, very, very mild. With good tuning I'd bet you could idle it down to 400 RPM.
This is the best thing I've seen yet in this thread. I'm not a fan of dyno racing. Particularly considering all the happy dyno, innaccurate dyno, correction factor etc. issues such as we've heard here. The true test of how a car performs, in terms of acceleration, is how quick can it cover a measured distance, from a standing start.
Good luck at the track. Looking forward to the results.
Facts r facts, that is the best dyno anyone can do. Measured distance and time! I agree Why pay to have your car on a machine. You should be able to notice all the little changes you make to your own car. Seat of the pants still works for me.
Dyno racing is useless...dyno tuning is incredibly valuable. It doesn't help getting the car to hook, but it can - and in my experience virtually always does - make a huge difference in power.
Dyno racing is useless...dyno tuning is incredibly valuable. It doesn't help getting the car to hook, but it can - and in my experience virtually always does - make a huge difference in power.
I don't doubt the usefulness of dyno tuning. What I have a problem with is guys everywhere bragging about their big dyno numbers with no impressive track data to match it. Guys at car shows with dyno graphs on their windshields implying that that equals a certain impressive ET on a track. It doesn't. Its true that without a certain amount of power you can't run a certain ET/MPH. But its also true that reaching those power levels on a dyno doesn't come close to running those numbers on a track.
I don't doubt the usefulness of dyno tuning. What I have a problem with is guys everywhere bragging about their big dyno numbers with no impressive track data to match it. Guys at car shows with dyno graphs on their windshields implying that that equals a certain impressive ET on a track. It doesn't. Its true that without a certain amount of power you can't run a certain ET/MPH. But its also true that reaching those power levels on a dyno doesn't come close to running those numbers on a track.
Dyno racing is useless...dyno tuning is incredibly valuable. It doesn't help getting the car to hook, but it can - and in my experience virtually always does - make a huge difference in power.
Originally Posted by BKbroiler
I don't doubt the usefulness of dyno tuning. What I have a problem with is guys everywhere bragging about their big dyno numbers with no impressive track data to match it. Guys at car shows with dyno graphs on their windshields implying that that equals a certain impressive ET on a track. It doesn't. Its true that without a certain amount of power you can't run a certain ET/MPH. But its also true that reaching those power levels on a dyno doesn't come close to running those numbers on a track.
I TOTALLY TOTALLY agree with you guys !
BK I can't believe that there are braggards who actually display their dyno graph's on their windshields !! What a bunch of LOSERS !!
You want to impress people / prove something - show us your ET tickets.
Might as well not bother with the trouble of building and bringing a car - let's just bring motors on the back of pick-ups and have a portable dyno to move from one to the other - makes just as much sense !
The dyno shop's / engine builders just love this stuff LOL
Having owned and driven one as my first car for many years I wasn't surprised. Motor never wanted to rev much past 4500.
I was almost afraid when I did heads/cam to push past 5k. Once I've got this carb dialed in I'm hoping for 6k. lol
The cam is very, very, very mild. With good tuning I'd bet you could idle it down to 400 RPM.
I run the same cam (got it from a GM mechanic's stash of warrantee parts) 4 or so degrees retarded - with L48/82 intake and 2 1/2" ram horns with open pipes - shift at 5600 - mid to high 13's in a '59.
Drag strip "tuned" at annual Corvette drags (once a year) over the course of many years LOL.