When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'm rebuilding a '70 LT-1 which last ran in 1993. The issue is, it has 292 casting heads, which I thought was only available over the counter, so apparently they're not original, but they're in pretty bad shape. They probably need more work than they're worth.
I have a set of 041 heads that are in great shape I could put on it. How do these two castings compare performance wise? The combustion chambers appear to be the same shape and size. Anyone have any information on these heads?
About 20 years ago, I swapped some 186 castings for a set of 292s on a 400ci powered Camaro.
Both had 2.02/1.60 valves and some mild port work that I had done, but the 292s had a bigger valve spring.
The 292s were worth about a 1/2 second in the quarter on what had previously been a low 13 second car.
Today I'd have to think twice about it and look closely at the cost to rebuild those 292s. There are a lot of aftermarket heads out there. Some are great, some are junk.
If I were you, I'd first decide what your goal is.
Do you want to go fast?
Do you want the car original (or close to it)?
Do you want to stick with cast iron heads or go to aluminum?
and of course - How much are you willing to spend on the other three questions?
041, 186... heads are 40 year old 170'ish cc heads 292 are over 30 years old with 180 ish cc whether angle plugs or straight are old tech chambers.
Sportsman II were the rage with 200cc and 2.050 intakes
I ran them with screw in studs and guide plates and up to 2.055 intake valves. After all that money 25 years ago they cracked the chambers between the in intake and exhaust sheets and leaked fluid
Dart iron eagle or Platinum ............. all out of the box with modern chambers blow them away with 180 - 200 cc intakes.
Heart shaped chambers with modern fast burn. I'm not a fan of Vortect heads but they do have performance gains for a budget minded person
This is the info I'm looking for. If the 292's have bigger ports, then I'd rather use them.
The 292 heads were very superior in port flow. Like I said I ran them with 2.05 and 2.055 Manley proflow valves. They also have screw in studs.
Because they are iron they need to have the chambers mildly polished and made to match the bore so you don't have an hot spots or material hanging over in the bore
The 292 heads were very superior in port flow. Like I said I ran them with 2.05 and 2.055 Manley proflow valves. They also have screw in studs.
Because they are iron they need to have the chambers mildly polished and made to match the bore so you don't have an hot spots or material hanging over in the bore
George is absolutely correct here. 292s are worth 20-40 HP over a similarly prepared production casting of the good style heads 041/186/492/461 heads ( all are within spitting distance of one another when properly ported.) I have one last set of 292 "Turbo" heads that survived UNC racked because they were ported and the chambers polished before they were put into use. If a set of 292s aren't ported/polished it is highly likely that there are stress cracks in them. Great heads for the era and I remember my buddy swearing at Chevy when they were discontinued and the Bow Tie heads replaced them. It took a while before head porters exceeded the flow numbers of the 292 heads when they were replaced. The Bow Ties were quickly revamped into 2nd design status after Chevy was put on notice by the racing community.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.