When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Chris do you have flow numbers and prices for these heads? Are they cnc runners/ chambers? screw in studs? Have you built any engines with these, if so how did they do?
These are off my SF 600 in TN air:
Lift Intake Exhaust
.300 202 145
.400 235 175
.500 241 185
.600 248 190
Super Flow HP Formula
248 x .2575 x 8cylinders = 510.88 HP at 100% VE is what the head can make out of the box.
Head is as cast out of the box. The above numbers are with no added work to the basic 3 angle cut on the seat. Margins have not been narrow or played with.
Scott did some some just bowl work and put a valve job on one set to see how they would respond. They flowed 276 at .600"
248 x .2575 x 8cylinders = 510.88 HP at 100% VE is what the head can make out of the box.
Head is as cast out of the box. The above numbers are with no added work to the basic 3 angle cut on the seat. Margins have not been narrow or played with.
Scott did some some just bowl work and put a valve job on one set to see how they would respond. They flowed 276 at .600"
They flow better than the edelbrock performers that I had on my l48, which I had bought at the time due to budget constraints. What do they cost?
They flow better than the edelbrock performers that I had on my l48, which I had bought at the time due to budget constraints. What do they cost?
If you look back on hte Car Craft article in 2012 SBC Budget Head shoot out, this head came out on top. For a budget import casting it is a very good head. Is it an AFR, no. It is budget friendly for many performance guys wanting bang for the buck, yes.
If you look back on hte Car Craft article in 2012 SBC Budget Head shoot out, this head came out on top. For a budget import casting it is a very good head. Is it an AFR, no. It is budget friendly for many performance guys wanting bang for the buck, yes.
I remember the article. They made more power than the dart shp, not by a lot, but still more. Are these the same heads you have on your web site for $695.00 a pair assembled?
Last edited by bluedawg; Dec 18, 2013 at 04:25 PM.
Reason: dropped my beer!
I remember the article. They made more power than the dart shp, not by a lot, but still more. Are these the same heads you have on your web site for $695.00 a pair assembled?
That's cheap for sure, cheaper than what vortecs cost not to mention they work with a standard intake. Add four or five hundred bucks worth of porting and you got heads that are close to flow of a set of afrs for around 1100.
Last edited by bluedawg; Dec 18, 2013 at 04:23 PM.
Reason: that time of the month....
That's cheap for sure, cheaper than what vortecs cost not to mention they work with a standard intake. Add four or five hundred bucks worth of porting and you got heads that are close to flow of a set of afrs for around 1100.
The casting when compared to other import heads is 2#'s heavier. That's quite a bit more meat.
290/325 You will hardly notice it and for such a small hp increase on that specific block I would not dump a top end on it . Look for a better intake and 1.6 rockers and a free flowing exhaust and call it a day.
Using the components that you have it is do able!!! Even a little porting, or cleanup the flow and rockers etc.. should do it.
Using the components that you have it is do able!!! Even a little porting, or cleanup the flow and rockers etc.. should do it.
I'd completely agree that for a 35 horse gain that it's just a cam swap away. Id also think that 35 horse gain all be it more power and would be noticeable would just start the horse power addiction.
I'm not discrediting any thing but there's a lot of talk on the forum lately about these inexpensive crate motors that folks want to add more power to. Even bigger is the discussion that follows about weather or not the short block can take it. I get accused of working for afr cause if budget allows that's what I usually suggest. It's funny.
I'm not discrediting any thing but there's a lot of talk on the forum lately about these inexpensive crate motors that folks want to add more power to. Even bigger is the discussion that follows about weather or not the short block can take it. I get accused of working for afr cause if budget allows that's what I usually suggest. It's funny.
I have one of the budget crate motors that I believe some are talking about. It's a good motor for the money, it fit my budget at the time, and has 4 bolt mains so I don't see any issue in adding a top end kit and even adding a roller cam and spinning the motor up higher as the bottom end should handle the extra power and revs...
I will be putting a top end kit on some day, maybe sooner rather than later but don't think I'll be going with AFR heads but instead will go with the Patriot as car craft rated them high and the price is more in my budget
I went back to the other article were the short block was used with nitrous and the dint talk about changing the pistons. What was interesting is the article and scroggin dickey both confirm the consensus on the forum about gms compression ratio being over valued. The end up hitting it with a 200 shot and hit there goal, but I wouldn't figure that engine would last long with that.
I have one of the budget crate motors that I believe some are talking about. It's a good motor for the money, it fit my budget at the time, and has 4 bolt mains so I don't see any issue in adding a top end kit and even adding a roller cam and spinning the motor up higher as the bottom end should handle the extra power and revs...
I will be putting a top end kit on some day, maybe sooner rather than later but don't think I'll be going with AFR heads but instead will go with the Patriot as car craft rated them high and the price is more in my budget
For the money straubs heads seem like a budget value. I'm an afr fan, but afr are more than double the price and if on a tight budget but wanted more power would eat up a big part of the budget. If memory serves me the biggest part of the discussion was about the powdered metal rods and cast pistons holding up. When you do your stipend you should start a thread on it.
Last edited by bluedawg; Dec 19, 2013 at 12:25 PM.
For the money straubs heads seem like a budget value. I'm an afr fan, but afr are more than double the price and if on a tight budget but wanted more power would eat up a big part of the budget. If memory serves me the biggest part of the discussion was about the powdered metal rods and cast pistons holding up. When you do your stipend you should start a thread on it.
I didn't know straubs made heads, will take a look at them - thanks
I'm not discrediting any thing but there's a lot of talk on the forum lately about these inexpensive crate motors that folks want to add more power to. Even bigger is the discussion that follows about weather or not the short block can take it. I get accused of working for afr cause if budget allows that's what I usually suggest. It's funny.
It seems to me that these budget crate motors are a poor platform from which to build even a mild performance engine. The pistons are cast aluminum dish type, cast iron crank, low compression set up, old school cams etc.
Only good thing I see about them is that it is a four bolt main and it is probably pretty good for what HP it is rated at in that price range.
If a guy wants just a small bump and doesn't have a good block or bottom end to work with, I guess I can see it. But it's still gonna need a head and cam change with a CR bump to get your effort's worth out of it, and you still have low end pistons.
If any more than that is wanted then I'd be looking to just pay more to get what you really want.
I wouldn't want to spend the $$ on AFR's for this kind of build. The AFR is capable of far more than the rest of the engine could support. These heads Straub is talking about would fit the build very well( price wise) I would think.