driveshaft angle


A line drawn out of the diff yoke should parallel a line drawn out the trans tailshaft. Lines never cross.
Look at any Monster truck and u will see the tremendous angles made by the u-joints but the trans tailshaft and diff axis lines remain in parallel.
cardo0
A line drawn out of the diff yoke should parallel a line drawn out the trans tailshaft. Lines never cross.
Look at any Monster truck and u will see the tremendous angles made by the u-joints but the trans tailshaft and diff axis lines remain in parallel.
cardo0
What I am trying to say is that there is an alternative arrangement called the W arrangement where the out going and in going shafts are NOT parallell.This arrangement will give the same conditions as the Z arrangement and will work just as good. This is tested and proven technology since the beginning of cardan shaft design and used all over the world in different applications.
Before you all starts to flame me, please read the technical documentation from GWB (Gelenk Wellen Bau) that I am linking to below. You will find all engineering and design information starting at page 38 and the detailed explanation of the Z and W arrangement is on page 40. (Download the pdf document).
www.gwb-essen.de/cataloge.html
I hope this will give clear and good information on the subject.
/Daniel







I cannot feel any difference between either configuration while turning by hand and a little math suggests a relatively minor lift of the differential will create equal W-arrangement angles (1.88 degrees each side) in my drivetrain. Hope that works.
Last edited by ignatz; Jan 5, 2014 at 09:48 PM. Reason: angles
My reference to raising the rear was quite literally raising the mounting of the differential with respect to the chassis, not altering the angle front or back. I did need to alter that angle, but that was related to getting the driveline angles correct.
I ended up with about 2.6 degrees down for tranny, and 2.6 degrees up for the nose of the diff. To get this in my config, I had to modify the front diff bracket, but I doubt you will need to go that far. Simply trimming the rubber mount to get the right angles should do it.
BTW, fun fact I learned. One of the reasons there is an angle (apart from needing one with universals to avoid flat spots) is to gain interior space. What I found most interesting is that this angle is pretty consistent across most cars and is about 3 degrees. Here's the cool part. Did you ever wonder why if you sit an intake manifold on level ground the rear of the carb mount is higher than the front? Yep, it's to account for the engine being mounted on an angle
Accommodating this angle ensures the carb sits flat and that there is an equal distribution of fuel in the bowls.Good luck!
My reference to raising the rear was quite literally raising the mounting of the differential with respect to the chassis, not altering the angle front or back. I did need to alter that angle, but that was related to getting the driveline angles correct.
I ended up with about 2.6 degrees down for tranny, and 2.6 degrees up for the nose of the diff. To get this in my config, I had to modify the front diff bracket, but I doubt you will need to go that far. Simply trimming the rubber mount to get the right angles should do it.
BTW, fun fact I learned. One of the reasons there is an angle (apart from needing one with universals to avoid flat spots) is to gain interior space. What I found most interesting is that this angle is pretty consistent across most cars and is about 3 degrees. Here's the cool part. Did you ever wonder why if you sit an intake manifold on level ground the rear of the carb mount is higher than the front? Yep, it's to account for the engine being mounted on an angle
Accommodating this angle ensures the carb sits flat and that there is an equal distribution of fuel in the bowls.Good luck!
The transmission:

The Diff:
(90-87,2=2,8°)
BTW, you do outstanding work!
-Fred
Nice to hear from you, and thanks for the kudos

/Daniel
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
It is a bit hard to measure really accurately but my digital angle gauge suggests about 2.7 degrees for the tranny to the driveshaft and about 2.2 degrees for the driveshaft to the differential. These angles are in the horizontal plane. That would make sense for the motor sitting up higher.
The vertical plane angles are pretty much stock. I don't see that anything has necessarily been relocated from the stock position.
The transmission yoke and tailshaft were renewed sometime back and I think that should still be pretty tight. All the universals including the half shafts have been replaced and everything balanced by South Bay Driveline. The half shafts are in a pretty much horizontal position when the car is on the ground.
Pulled the clutch and flywheel out and had them balanced. There is some vibration still when I rev the motor in neutral so that may be a forcing function to any other problems. That's another story*.
It wouldn't be too hard to put a spacer under the transmission. I am thinking that those two angles ought to be a bit closer to each other.
I've found a number of threads that suggest just how hard these things are to pin down, but in the interest of one thing at a time, what should the drive line angles be? And should the two angles be about the same?
___________________________
*I reused my SBC pressure plate to mount to the LS flywheel but the mounting holes were a bit too small. Reamed them out very carefully but it is possible I introduced a tiny amount of eccentricity. I don't want to buy another pressure plate and do this job again until I work the easier stuff!






Like your digital protractor, my digital cube is pretty cool because of the zero function. That means as long as the angles are small I can measure differential angles by moving it around. So for instance I zero it on the frame rail, move it to the diff (reads zero again) and then move it to the transmission (now 4.4 degrees). It's all relative and I don't care much about local vertical.
Knowing the length of the driveshaft and the moment arm of the diff, I can calculate how much to move the diff up to get equal angles between the two ends for W.
Now then there's a complication. Besides the up and down stuff there's the left to right stuff with the motor offset to the passenger side. Running a string fore and aft I take the arrangement to be of the W variety, that is the centerline of the diff is NOT parallel to that of the transmission. I am thinking there is some rotation of the driveshaft which will accommodate both misalignments but I don't see how to make this measurement with the body on. Alternatively I suppose I could view the drive shaft as a space diagonal but I don't want to. Did see a lot of math in the pdf but this is already way more of a science project* than I want.
_______________
*as my boss in my engineering job used to say, "don't turn this into a "science project"!
Last edited by ignatz; Jan 6, 2014 at 04:06 PM. Reason: parallel
Like your digital protractor, my digital cube is pretty cool because of the zero function. That means as long as the angles are small I can measure differential angles by moving it around. So for instance I zero it on the frame rail, move it to the diff (reads zero again) and then move it to the transmission (now 4.4 degrees). It's all relative and I don't care much about local vertical.
Knowing the length of the driveshaft and the moment arm of the diff, I can calculate how much to move the diff up to get equal angles between the two ends for W.
Now then there's a complication. Besides the up and down stuff there's the left to right stuff with the motor offset to the passenger side. Running a string fore and aft I take the arrangement to be of the W variety, that is the centerline of the diff is NOT parallel to that of the transmission. I am thinking there is some rotation of the driveshaft which will accommodate both misalignments but I don't see how to make this measurement with the body on. Alternatively I suppose I could view the drive shaft as a space diagonal but I don't want to. Did see a lot of math in the pdf but this is already way more of a science project* than I want.
_______________
*as my boss in my engineering job used to say, "don't turn this into a "science project"!
Don't worry about how the factory set it. I had a completely stock setup and I ended up having to trim the rear bushing to get rid of a vibration a long time ago. If you notice, the diff x-mamber is secured to the chassis by the rubber top hat bushings, these will pivot the unit as you change the front diff bushing thickness to get you the angle you need.
The horizontal offsets are a different matter. You should work in the two planes independently. The motor and transmission are offset to the passenger side by 1 inch. The rear diff is offset to the passenger side by .85 inch. If your top hat bushings are good, I would bet your diff is close already. Be sure to check the tranny as the holes are slotted. This is where most of the adjusting needs to be done.
Also, I would not worry about the angle of the driveshaft itself, this (on its own) is irrelevant as it will change as the transmission and pinion angles change and will not guarantee that both angles are equal and opposite to each other, which is the most important part.
As each shaft rotates, the center section of the u-joint moves back and forth to accomodate the change in angle of the shaft. So, the front u-joint will rotate at a specific frequency as the shaft turns and introduce a force. The u-joint on the rear of the shaft (if the angles are opposite and equal) will also introduce this force, but since it is in the opposite orientation, that force is 180 degrees out of phase with the front force, so they cancel out (no vibrations). If one moves more than the other, the force is greater and the other's cancelling force is not sufficient to cancel out the full force. The resulting left-over force ends up being felt as a vibration. The smaller the difference, the smaller the vibration, and consequently the larger the force, the larger the vibration. That's why being close counts here as well as in horseshoes and hand grenades
I've never done anything with configurations where both point in the same direction so I really can't comment on that setup.Make sure your transmission and diff angles are equal and opposite, and then check the horizontal offsets after that. If those are good, you are good to go.
Cheers.
Last edited by SLVRSHRK; Jan 6, 2014 at 04:42 PM.
I know it this might not be the tech way of doing it but ill wait until I blow the back end apart for all new bushings before ill bust out the angle gauge plus it's fixed
very good above. Get your angles equal on both sides and check the offset acording to his figures. Then you will be good to go.
As an information, the numbers you se on my photos are in respect to a completely level frame but that is really of no importance as long as they are equal on both sides.






Shimming the tranny is no big deal. Once you find out how much you need to add, just buy a small piece of stock on ebay and drill the holes.
With my TKO600, I had to add a full inch of shim to get it into alignment. I wanted to keep the exhaust hanger so I added 1/2 inch under and 1/2 inch over the bracket and it worked out fine.
Whatever you decide, nice work on sticking with it.
Shimming the tranny is no big deal. Once you find out how much you need to add, just buy a small piece of stock on ebay and drill the holes.
With my TKO600, I had to add a full inch of shim to get it into alignment. I wanted to keep the exhaust hanger so I added 1/2 inch under and 1/2 inch over the bracket and it worked out fine.
Whatever you decide, nice work on sticking with it.
While the difference in offset is tiny (.15 inch), having the two units parallel makes sure that the angles, however small, are equal and opposite.
Hope this helps.
Last edited by SLVRSHRK; Jan 7, 2014 at 01:53 PM.







The silver thing is just a flat magnetically clamped to the driveshaft to make an angle measurement. The driveshaft is 26", I think this offset is a lttle exaggerated from maybe not being exactly straight up. I don't know if the diff is aligned along the center of the car, I suspect so and I didn't take a lot of time to make more measurements so I can't guess at any of these angle magnitudes. This doesn't look tiny but I can't stand behind the picture very well either. Suffice to say there is some offset. Thing with the tranny is if you slot some mounting holes you can improve this.
If you search this forum you should be able to find pictures from a guy who used a laser to shoot a line from front to back. Saw that a while back but can't remember the details. And I think it was with a factory motor.
As to the carb SLVRSHRK, yes I have one and can kinda see some slope with the air filter on. My carb has sights in the bowls and I've set front and back individually. Going to leave it at that. If I shim the transmission there is going to be upward movement of the exhaust and I will end up either hitting the crossmember holes or stressing the pipes or both.

The silver thing is just a flat magnetically clamped to the driveshaft to make an angle measurement. The driveshaft is 26", I think this offset is a lttle exaggerated from maybe not being exactly straight up. I don't know if the diff is aligned along the center of the car, I suspect so and I didn't take a lot of time to make more measurements so I can't guess at any of these angle magnitudes. This doesn't look tiny but I can't stand behind the picture very well either. Suffice to say there is some offset. Thing with the tranny is if you slot some mounting holes you can improve this.
If you search this forum you should be able to find pictures from a guy who used a laser to shoot a line from front to back. Saw that a while back but can't remember the details. And I think it was with a factory motor.
As to the carb SLVRSHRK, yes I have one and can kinda see some slope with the air filter on. My carb has sights in the bowls and I've set front and back individually. Going to leave it at that. If I shim the transmission there is going to be upward movement of the exhaust and I will end up either hitting the crossmember holes or stressing the pipes or both.








