When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
My brother in law is doing a T56 swap on his '68. He has offered me one of two transmissions he has in the car: either the M22 that's in the car or an M20 wide ratio that he has as a spare. The deal will include the bell housing, clutch, flywheel and linkages. I will buy a new spring and plate, have the flywheel resurfaced and will rebuild whichever Trans I get.
My '80 currently has a TH350 with 3.73 rear end gears. I am leaning towards the M20 to give me a better too end and my motor makes ~420 at the crank so I doubt I will miss the lower gearing. If anyone disagrees please tell me.
My question is, how long are the Muncies compared to my Turbo? Will I have to have my drive shaft shortened or have a new one cut?
I'm not completely certain driveshafts are all that much different, but you can look for the stock 1980 4 speed transmission driveshaft used on the L-48 cars.
I did a T56 swap on my 1980 4 speed and still have the original trans crossmember and driveshaft sitting in my garage. The driveshaft has the slip yoke with solid Spicer U joints and the crossmember was acid dipped and powdercoated red. If it turns out that they are something you need, PM me.
neither transmission will give you a better top end, 4th gear is straight thru and 1:1 ratio on both of them.
the m20 with it's lower 1st gear ( higher numerically ) will give you better torque multiplication in 1st gear.. the m22 will have 2nd and third gear closer together. you won't see as much rpm difference between gears.
Thanks guys. I knew about the 1:1 final drive. For some reason the way I was thinking about it I was operating under the impression that the M22 had some sort of underdrive final gear, even though I knew it didn't.
Easy Mike, that is a good idea.
Mike80, so I am correct in assuming then that the Muncies will NOT bolt up to my TH30 crossmember? Will I have problems mounting the other crossmember since my car is set up for a bolt on xmember and the manuals were weld-on? I might very well take you up on that offer. PM sent your way.
As far as your original question, I could be wrong, but my research so far indicates that a Muncie will be a direct bolt in replacement for the TH350...at least as far as size goes...
same cross member, same drive shaft, etc...
I can tell you, form experience with my other car on which I did the swap, that was the case--I do not see why it would be any different on the 'vette, either--the dimensions of the Muncie and TH350 do not change
Last edited by keithl1967; Mar 6, 2014 at 07:14 PM.
In fact, the M20 with GM bell housing is a direct fit to the TH350, same lenght, output shaft splines count. A M22 shares same dimention lenght wise but output slines count is 32 like a TH400.
It did! So the M20 would be a more direct fit. The motor was designed based on the TH350 that is in the car. I do not believe that it is a truck 350. The cam on the motor gives me a very wide power band (~1500 - 5500, redlining at 6500). Would the wide ratio be the better choice for me then?
It did! So the M20 would be a more direct fit. The motor was designed based on the TH350 that is in the car. I do not believe that it is a truck 350. The cam on the motor gives me a very wide power band (~1500 - 5500, redlining at 6500). Would the wide ratio be the better choice for me then?
An M20 or an M21 would be a direct fit, with the same number of output splines.
As far as which would be better for you, it really depends on the rear gear you have. If you have the stock 3.08, I would go with the M20, which has a more stout 2.56 (or 2.52, depending upon the year of the trans) first gear (the M21 is a 2.20, if memory serves correctly). This means, you will have abetter "launch" off the line with the M20 and a stock gear.
If your rear is NUMERICALLY higher than 3.73 (ie 3.90 or 4.11), I would go with the M21...
In my '67 camaro, I have an M20 and a 3.73...it is really the "sweet spot" for taking off, but 1st gear is VERY short lived before having to shift...
Last edited by keithl1967; Mar 12, 2014 at 08:21 AM.
Mine is an L82 car. I want to say it has 3.73's for some reason but I can't back that up.
A 3.73 could go with either an M21 or an M20....In my Camaro, I have the 3.73 and M20, and it is a great launch...
If the gear is numerically higher than 3.73 (ie 3.90, 4.10), then I would go with the M21...
You could always put the rear of the car up in the air (properly supported, but so both rear wheels can turn freely), and mark the tire. Spin it forward, and count the number of revolutions of the pinion yoke for one full tire revolution...just over 3= 3.08; 3 and 3/4turns =3.73, closer to 4 full turns, and your looking at 3.90's or 4.10, etc...
I had best results using M20 small block setup. In fact, starting 1967, L48 M20 was the hot ticket in the SS350 camaro Vette. L82 M20 is indeed a superb combination !
Thanks! The close ratio is actually the M21. It looks like the M20 would be the easier swap but the M20 has been sitting for a good length of time with old fluid in it.
My brother in law is doing a T56 swap on his '68. He has offered me one of two transmissions he has in the car: either the M22 that's in the car or an M20 wide ratio that he has as a spare. The deal will include the bell housing, clutch, flywheel and linkages. I will buy a new spring and plate, have the flywheel resurfaced and will rebuild whichever Trans I get.
My '80 currently has a TH350 with 3.73 rear end gears. I am leaning towards the M20 to give me a better too end and my motor makes ~420 at the crank so I doubt I will miss the lower gearing. If anyone disagrees please tell me.
My question is, how long are the Muncies compared to my Turbo? Will I have to have my drive shaft shortened or have a new one cut?
For clarification Muncies PRE 71 are ¾" SHORTER than the later ones....
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.