When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
So like I have stated before this is my first C3 1972 vert. So I am rebuilding the front and rear suspension. The front is a Van Steel coilover setup and the rear is there composite spring with Bilsteen shocks. I am putting 18s on the car and notice that the rear is super high so I order longer bolts but to get the car where it does not look like a four wheel drive it looks as if half shafts are pointed up which I know is not good! I am running a 285 35 18 on the rear but going to a 40 on the aspect ratio still would not help enough. I have seen a lot of C3 run 18s with that tire combo and the ride height looks great. So all of those cars have a terrible angle on there half shafts?? What am I missing? Thought about going to a 275 45 18 but not really wanting to buy new tires. Thanks for any help.
The rule of thumb around the racing community was to have them be level as possible at static ride height.
That was with 15" wheels but much taller aspect ratio tires of the time.
Some cars would have the diff crossmember relocated in the frame or the diff mounting point recessed into the crossmember.
The point is that U joints like to run just about level. High angles cause them to move alot which creates heat.
No I don't think it would come close if the shock bottomed out. I don't know the angle but just looking at it with the eye I can see that they are angled up.
The rule of thumb around the racing community was to have them be level as possible at static ride height.
That was with 15" wheels but much taller aspect ratio tires of the time.
Some cars would have the diff crossmember relocated in the frame or the diff mounting point recessed into the crossmember.
The point is that U joints like to run just about level. High angles cause them to move alot which creates heat.
Locke
North Florida Corvette Assn.
Hey Locke,
Not level at static ride height, but rather around 0.5" higher at the inner (diff. side) than the outer (trailing arm) side. This difference is to ensure that the suspension runs in the most favorable region of the toe steer curve (that is, goes into toe in under bump). When the half shafts are higher at the trailing arm side than the differential side, the suspension goes into toe out under bump - not great!
Hardly any fuel in it right now. I will post some pics later today. I just cant believe that all the lowered C3s I have seen have not had the same problem.
No I don't think it would come close if the shock bottomed out. I don't know the angle but just looking at it with the eye I can see that they are angled up.
Hold on! Let's make sure we are talking about the same thing. (I know what I am picturing....but it may not be what you are seeing)
When you say the half-shafts are angled up.......
do you mean that the end bolted to the differential is higher?
OR......
do you mean that the end that is bolted to the wheel/trailing arm is higher?
Whoa, that's not good. Especially after you fill the tank and get in the diff gets lower. Just curious, a 285/35/18 is about 25.85" diameter tire. How high are your rear wheel openings from the ground right now?
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
Originally Posted by rayy
Trailing arm side is higher.
No, not good at all. And, not only is adverse toe-steer inherent to the C2/C3 IRS as already mentioned, but the extent to which it occurs increases progressively the further from level the half-shafts travel as a function of the trigonometry in play. This happens in both bump and droop, but is far more important when the rear is more highly loaded in bump. I'd strive to get those inner u-joints ~1/2" above the outers, raising the diff in the chassis if a lower CG is that important to your purposes. While you're at it, I'd suggest checking your front "Z" heights to see if that might also be below the point of diminishing returns up front as well.
... I have seen a lot of C3 run 18s with that tire combo and the ride height looks great. So all of those cars have a terrible angle on there half shafts?? What am I missing? ...
Just a thought: A car with old compressed rubber body mounts will sit lower than a car with new mounts.
Do you have new body mounts that make your car sit a bit higher?
From a good flat sarface to the top ark of the rear wheel well is 26.5.
26.5 is a decent heigth. My car with a steel leaf spring was at 29.75" when I bought it....I lowered it to 28.0"....with a full tank and driver it lowers to 27".
Being a rookie, I do not know how a monoleaf affects the body heigth.