When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hello all. Shop has just finished my 350 vortec engine.
My mechanic was about to install the header/sidepipe combo when he calls to tell me that the header tube diameter is 2 inches which he says is way too big and will kill performance. In his words "like trying to run with a bag over your face".
The header/tube combo is a maximizer set(obx) that many here have used. The actual diameter is 1.9. Hes telling me 1 5/8 is most I should use. He's also worried about the gasket sealing.
Any opinions from those running obx header/sidepipe or with performance c3s is welcome.
Thanks
link to headers
http://www.ebay.com/itm/171794324739?_trksid=p2060353.m2749.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
Last edited by TanksFull; Jun 11, 2015 at 01:30 PM.
Lots of us have run these or Hooker side pipes with mild or even stock 350s. The closer to stock you are, will cost you some low end torque but it's not huge. I ran them on a vortec-headed 355. I still had fun.
He is right that those headers are not an ideal primary tube size for a 350 but not unusual for these cars.
Install'em and keep upgrading until you are running a big cubic inch stroker to fill up that header...
I run the 1 7/8" headers with side pipes. The only size they come in from hooker. 350 CI engine. Ran fine stock and now modded @ 377 HP. You may need some jetting adjustments depending on which inserts you get.
Some performance may be missing, but the cool factor is all there. Get a higher stall torque converter if you want to get a better launch. Mine stalls @ 2600. That and a shift kit for the Th350 make it a lot of fun.
Lots of us have run these or Hooker side pipes with mild or even stock 350s. The closer to stock you are, will cost you some low end torque but it's not huge. I ran them on a vortec-headed 355. I still had fun.
IMO they'll still meet or beat the low end torque available w/ ram's horns. And certainly decimate them at mid-range and top.
The listing that was posted, says the header primaries are 1.9" Overall Diameter. This translates to approximately 1.75" ID, which is the dimension you should be concerned about. A "street" header would possibly be better at 1.625", but in all reality, I wouldn't quibble over it.....
Hello all. Shop has just finished my 350 vortec engine.
My mechanic was about to install the header/sidepipe combo when he calls to tell me that the header tube diameter is 2 inches which he says is way too big and will kill performance. In his words "like trying to run with a bag over your face".
The header/tube combo is a maximizer set(obx) that many here have used. The actual diameter is 1.9. Hes telling me 1 5/8 is most I should use. He's also worried about the gasket sealing.
Any opinions from those running obx header/sidepipe or with performance c3s is welcome.
Thanks
I have some Sanderson Short Headers for my zz383 vortex d shaped exhaust ports. Speaking with the Manufacture my 1 3/4" tubes are difficult to build to seal properly when the vortex ports measure 1.5 x 1.5 approx. So the flange design is the important area to determine if they will seal or not. If they dont account for the port size on the head it is possible they wont seal properly. Compare the exhaust port size and shape to the header flange size, this will tell you if leaks may be a possibility.
From: Graceland in a Not Correctly Restored Stingray
SB Corvette sidemounts have had 1.875" OD x ~45" long primaries as long as I can remember. And I made a point of posting that latter dimension. IMCO it would be a mistake to overlook that primary length is just as important in header design as diameter. It helps to think of primary diameter as locating the fulcrum, and primary length as how much weight is on each end of the lever. So, while in theory a shorter primary of only 1.625" OD may locate peak TQ nearer to your intended target, it is entirely possible that the long-tube sidemounts could put more TQ under the curve within your intended performance RPM range. And, at the end of the day whatever you put aft of the collectors could well compromise whatever is ahead of them anyway.
In any event, assuming that you're not racing for serious money or you wouldn't rely on asking the interweb, I'd relax and install the sidemounts if that's your preference. Besides, you'd think if they were all that far off for most applications that someone would have gone back to the drawing board after all these decades, no? FWIW, the BB ones are 2.125" OD, and none of the 427s I've built have lacked for TQ/HP. My $.02