When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 1979 Corvette with a DeWitts radiator, dual SPAL fans, timing set at 10 degrees. Whenever the A/C is turned on, the temperature climbs. If it's hot out, it will climb fairly high (it's gone over 220). If it's in the low 80's, it might climb up to 190. Turning on the A/C also turns on the fans.
It gets hottest while traveling at sustained high speeds. I took some IR readings today after a drive. I got 190* at the thermostat housing, 185* at the end of the upper radiator hose near the radiator, 165* at the top of the radiator by the upper radiator hose fitting. On the return side, I got anywhere from 160* at the top of the radiator on the passenger side, and as low as 125* towards the bottom.
HOWEVER, the lower radiator hose was reading just over 170*. This seems strange to me to have the coolant that's flowing back into the engine being hotter than the coolant in the radiator. I'm suspecting I might need a new water pump. What do the experts here think?
make sure lower radiator hose isnt collapsing, should have a spring inside of it. i had to add a 2 inch extension to my lower air dam (spoiler) on my 79L82. i am running dual spals also. mine climbs some with the ac on but never over 200 degrees. i also have my timing set at 36 degrees total mech. advance, initial came out to 18. i am running straight manifold vacuum to the vacuum advance on the hei. timing helps alot with the temps.....running a 180 thermostat too.
make sure lower radiator hose isnt collapsing, should have a spring inside of it. i had to add a 2 inch extension to my lower air dam (spoiler) on my 79L82. i am running dual spals also. mine climbs some with the ac on but never over 200 degrees. i also have my timing set at 36 degrees total mech. advance, initial came out to 18. i am running straight manifold vacuum to the vacuum advance on the hei. timing helps alot with the temps.....
My lower radiator hose doesn't have a spring inside of it, but it should be one of the ones made out of newer material that doesn't require it. If I end up replacing the water pump, I'll probably replace the hose as well.
I've had the timing at a few degrees higher and lower, as well as disconnected the vacuum advance altogether, and none had any bearing on how hot the engine got.
The engine is built up with aluminum AFR heads and high compression pistons and has a complicated history since it was rebuilt.
EDIT: I'm running a 160* thermostat. I've tried 2 different ones with no change.
Put the stock 7-blade clutch fan and shroud back on and your heating problems will vanish.....................
We took them off because after the engine was built and the DeWitts put in, the car would get hot at idle with the stock fan and shroud (which I never got back from my mechanic). The electric fans kept it from getting hot at idle, so the current setup worked much better than the stock setup. Besides, the stock fan and shroud are designed to not do much work at high speed (where I'm currently having issues), since most of the airflow comes from the car moving. Everything was fine until after I had to have the heads replaced. Now it runs hot.
The IR temps were posted to show that the radiator is significantly colder than the coolant in the car, so airflow shouldn't be a problem. What is bothering me is that the lower radiator hose is hotter than the radiator, even though the coolant is supposed to flow from the radiator to the lower hose.
You're reading the raw aluminum surface of the radiator vs a black hose right? The emissivity difference between the materials could easily explain it.
You won't get a proper temperature reading from materials with low emissivity like aluminum using an IR gun calibrated for a material with a relatively high emissivity like almost anything that is black. Paint the radiator tank black where you're reading temperature and try it again.
You're reading the raw aluminum surface of the radiator vs a black hose right? The emissivity difference between the materials could easily explain it.
You won't get a proper temperature reading from materials with low emissivity like aluminum using an IR gun calibrated for a material with a relatively high emissivity like almost anything that is black. Paint the radiator tank black where you're reading temperature and try it again.
But wouldn't that difference also be apparent with my aluminum intake manifold? There's not much difference between the intake manifold and the hose.
The dual fans could actually restrict the air coming thru the radiator at cruising speeds. Duntov was aware of how much the shroud would reduce the air flow thru the radiator at high speeds and I'm suspecting that is what is happening to yours.
do you have front spoiler or air deflector in place. are your seals around raddy in place. do both fans turn on when it reaches set temp. I had a similar problem and one of the fuses was installed incorrectly and 2nd fan wouldn't turn on but I had more trouble while stuck in LA traffic and it would run 220 on hw but wouldn't climb up, once I got both fans running good I barely see 210.
You mentioned your initial timing as 10* BTDC which is generally a good place to start. Where is it at RPM? Point being are you sure your advance is working?
Next thing was the heads were changed, did you do it? Any pics of the process? Are you sure all the passage holes lined up?
I know you probably did this but make sure the fans are pulling air through the radiator. Got any pics of the setup? Is the radiator sealed to the mount? On my 81 there are a couple plastic pieces connected to the front of the fender skirts that seal that area up, make sure those are in place.
As stated above, Air Dam in place and in the correct shape?
You mentioned your initial timing as 10* BTDC which is generally a good place to start. Where is it at RPM? Point being are you sure your advance is working?
Next thing was the heads were changed, did you do it? Any pics of the process? Are you sure all the passage holes lined up?
I know you probably did this but make sure the fans are pulling air through the radiator. Got any pics of the setup? Is the radiator sealed to the mount? On my 81 there are a couple plastic pieces connected to the front of the fender skirts that seal that area up, make sure those are in place.
As stated above, Air Dam in place and in the correct shape?
Timing goes to about 32 degrees at about 2700 rpms without vacuum advance. As mentioned, disconnecting the vacuum advance didn't make a difference.
I didn't replace the heads. At some point between January and April, all of the coolant in my car disappeared without any signs of overheating or leaking. That trashed the heads. They were replaced by the engine builder with the same heads that came off of it.
Fans are definitely pulling air, both fans are coming on at temperature and because of the ac.
The front air dam is in place.
Radiator seals around the top of the radiator are missing, but they've always been missing and it didn't even start to get hot before.
The main thing that I'm concerned about is the fact that the return hose is hotter than the radiator. I may just replace the hoses since they're cheap.
More timing advance=less heat generated. Hook up the vac advance up.
And use the seal at top of rad. This is VERY needed to keep air thru the rad, not AROUND it at speed. I made mine using a 2 in foam for a window AC from HD.
More timing advance=less heat generated. Hook up the vac advance up.
And use the seal at top of rad. This is VERY needed to keep air thru the rad, not AROUND it at speed. I made mine using a 2 in foam for a window AC from HD.
ALL seals around the radiator are VERY important. You need to keep in mind that you want to isolate the area in FRONT of the fan/radiator from the motor compartment as much as possible.
You have a great setup and it should be able to keep up with no problem. Of course, I am biased as I have the same setup and it never overheats.
That's why I created this thread. I'm aware of all of the other things mentioned so far, which is why I keep mentioning the IR readings and asking for input about that in almost all of my replies.
That's why I created this thread. I'm aware of all of the other things mentioned so far, which is why I keep mentioning the IR readings and asking for input about that in almost all of my replies.
You mentioned this started after getting new AFR heads. What kind of headers are you using and did you do a port match?
If the header flange is covering any portion of the head exhaust port there will be a flow inversion and a build up of heat in the head. I didn't see in your posts, but do you also have temperature measurements taken there?
Last edited by Silvertone; Sep 16, 2015 at 01:32 PM.
You mentioned this started after getting new AFR heads. What kind of headers are you using and did you do a port match?
If the header flange is covering any portion of the head exhaust port there will be a flow inversion and a build up of heat in the head. I didn't see in your posts, but do you also have temperature measurements taken there?
The new heads are the same as the old heads, and it didn't overheat with the old heads. I have Hooker full length headers. I've scanned the headers with an IR gun, and on both sides the front and rear header tubes are around 550*, the center forward header is around 650*, and the rear middle is around 700*.