When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
The key here is the aluminum heads. They will tolerate a full point of compression more than iron heads.
Is that due to the ability of aluminum to carry heat away from the combustion chamber faster? Or is it a mechanical design difference relative to older cast iron heads (quench area or something)?
Is that due to the ability of aluminum to carry heat away from the combustion chamber faster? Or is it a mechanical design difference relative to older cast iron heads (quench area or something)?
Good question
Its because of the aluminium's ability to dissipate the heat better. So in order to get an aluminium head to run efficiently you actually need to raise the compression ratio to build the heat. All this though is moot if you cant flow enough air through the runners which is important to sustain the VE of the engine. also most aluminium heads have more core shifting in them over iron heads. Which is again important to buy a quality casting.
So much more to this than just buying a bunch of brand name performance parts and putting something together expecting to make over 350 .fwhp.
I've seen many people buy the latest and greatest parts expecting to have a street slayer only to have a slug.
Modern engines with reverse flow cooling systems can tolerate higher cylinder pressures because the heads get cooled first. But for our aging C3's I feel its best to limit the compression ratios to around 10 to 10.5 to 1 to avoid detonation. I'm running a 9.95 to 1 compression ratio in my 454" powered '71 and I can barely get by with 91 octane and 31 degrees of advance.
I can remember compression ratios as high as 13.5 to 1 in the late 60's muscle cars but that was when 102 octane gasoline was available but even then an octane booster was added for racing. Many folks used 115 octane aviation gasoline which was about 5 times the cost.
Do you post just to be opposite ?? I really wonder how you come up with the things you say and just sit back and think it can only be possible if you are trying to be opposite or create a defenseless position so you can argue with others.
Do you post just to be opposite ?? I really wonder how you come up with the things you say and just sit back and think it can only be possible if you are trying to be opposite or create a defenseless position so you can argue with others.
So only people who agree with the majority can post? His experience in this case matches up with mine. Now maybe it's not 100% applicable being as this discussion seems to center on small blocks and aluminum heads. However, he was pretty careful to define the conditions. Does he really need to be reprimanded for that?
Occasionally, I'll be forced to put a 'lesser' 92 octane fuel in...Citgo/Wawa/Sheetz...I prefer to purchase from BP/Sunoco/Exxon/Shell and the like. I keep a bottle of Octane Booster handy and put in a half bottle just to make sure I'm good. I feel comfortable that I would be OK, but it's cheap insurance. I'd prefer keep this engine around for a while.
11.0:1 would be closer to the edge, but probably not over the limit with the right things done to the engine.
Last edited by keithinspace; Dec 6, 2015 at 08:49 PM.
So only people who agree with the majority can post? His experience in this case matches up with mine. Now maybe it's not 100% applicable being as this discussion seems to center on small blocks and aluminum heads. However, he was pretty careful to define the conditions. Does he really need to be reprimanded for that?
The original question was is 11:1 compression too much. Many people here are running 11:1 or close in both big and small blocks with good results on pump fuel.
I am doing it with both BBC and SBC. Big deal for me right? The only point I'm trying to say is IT can be done I'm doing it and I'm not really smarter than everyone else. Its just careful consideration of parts and using todays better head designs that are superior in flow and design than earlier heads.
Corvette Stories
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems
Pouria Savadkouei
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years
Joe Kucinski
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!
Michael S. Palmer
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!
Joe Kucinski
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter
Joe Kucinski
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)
Joe Kucinski
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!
So only people who agree with the majority can post? His experience in this case matches up with mine. Now maybe it's not 100% applicable being as this discussion seems to center on small blocks and aluminum heads. However, he was pretty careful to define the conditions. Does he really need to be reprimanded for that?
Nope , lots of people go into a topic and post about themselves NOT about what the OP is asking. Or go off on tangents that also have no useful information to the specific question.
Nope , lots of people go into a topic and post about themselves NOT about what the OP is asking. Or go off on tangents that also have no useful information to the specific question.
Seems that toobroke's post was relevant to the question being asked. I also happen to agree with it his opinion. The OP was asking for opinions. He got them. Not all opinions are going to be exactly the same as our individual experiences are going to vary. I also notice you seem to be trolling everywhere he posts. I'm personally tired of seeing you troll toobroke for no apparent reason other than you just don't have anything else better to do.
The original question was is 11:1 compression too much. Many people here are running 11:1 or close in both big and small blocks with good results on pump fuel.
I am doing it with both BBC and SBC. Big deal for me right? The only point I'm trying to say is IT can be done I'm doing it and I'm not really smarter than everyone else. Its just careful consideration of parts and using todays better head designs that are superior in flow and design than earlier heads.
I understand where you are coming from. It CAN be done. I think the old 10.5:1 rule of thumb is conservative. Not everyone has the skillset/knowledge to properly choose the correct cam, etc. So it's better to err on the conservative. Getting too greedy with compression, along with mismatched components, can cost alot of money, as in a blown engine. And all for .5 pt increase in compression that probably won't amount to much power at all. Not worth it. Unless you really know what you are doing. My LS engine builder says that's the number 1 reason why he gets other peoples blown engines because they get "greedy" with their tuning, compression, etc.
Seems that toobroke's post was relevant to the question being asked. I also happen to agree with it his opinion. The OP was asking for opinions. He got them. Not all opinions are going to be exactly the same as our individual experiences are going to vary. I also notice you seem to be trolling everywhere he posts. I'm personally tired of seeing you troll toobroke for no apparent reason other than you just don't have anything else better to do.
Cute , you call what you just did what ?
And this in not about individual experiences it is a specific question being asked , no one needs to tell a story about there cast headed BB LMAO or there engine builders dumb statements
OP 11.1 on street gas is not only doable but done easily and often.
And this in not about individual experiences it is a specific question being asked , no one needs to tell a story about there cast headed BB LMAO or there engine builders dumb statements
OP 11.1 on street gas is not only doable but done easily and often.
You're kidding, right? 10 posts in this thread are about individual experiences, lol! I'm at 9.75 : 1 with iron heads, 91 octane minimum. I know the same combination will take a point higher with aluminum heads.
And this in not about individual experiences it is a specific question being asked , no one needs to tell a story about there cast headed BB LMAO or there engine builders dumb statements
OP 11.1 on street gas is not only doable but done easily and often.
You feed the troll,,,,, This is where you went wrong:total:
And a junior member, whom is void of the trolls doings,,, well,,, you know:-)
And this in not about individual experiences it is a specific question being asked
OP's first post: "Is anyone doing this?" You read that, right? Seems to me, individual experiences are exactly what he's asking for. I get that you think the responses aren't sufficiently relevant, but that's a judgement call. No reason to tell someone to shut up. Damn, I was hoping Vette forums wouldn't have so much of this egocentric crap.
Trolling is when you constantly follow someone and post everywhere they post. I just did it once. Did I call anyone names? Did I make any untrue accusations or untrue statements? NOPE. Therefore, not trolling...
Originally Posted by diehrd
And this in not about individual experiences it is a specific question being asked , no one needs to tell a story about there cast headed BB LMAO or there engine builders dumb statements
Where in the rules of this forum does it say we can't talk about our own individual experiences? I do it all the time. Is this **** Germany? Do we need to relocate to exercise our First Amendment Rights?
Originally Posted by diehrd
OP 11.1 on street gas is not only doable but done easily and often.
Yeah I know, I have 11.3:1 in my 10 sec Firebird (street car), and I run on 93 octane and have well over 100 passes on the motor.
Last edited by htown81vette; Dec 7, 2015 at 01:38 PM.
If any relevant member of this forum thinks I follow any member around please post up.
And you other 2 are still crying because I pointed out your useless posts in a different thread that completely changed a topic on the OP .. LMAO get over it .
OP 11.1 is fine ,, No need to ask "My engine builder" and then post I have a 10 second firebird .. LMFAO ..
If any relevant member of this forum thinks I follow any member around please post up.
And you other 2 are still crying because I pointed out your useless posts in a different thread that completely changed a topic on the OP .. LMAO get over it .
OP 11.1 is fine ,, No need to ask "My engine builder" and then post I have a 10 second firebird .. LMFAO ..
Speaking of irrelevant....anyone who has an SHP 427 and only runs 11's....or dreams to one day...that is truly sad. You do know that, at this day and age there are LS engines with mere bolt ons running those times don't you? I thought my car was slow...
If I had that 427 SBC it would be running 9's thats a fact.
OP 11.1 is fine ,, No need to ask "My engine builder" and then post I have a 10 second firebird .. LMFAO ..
And further, if you say 11:1 is fine without knowing the angle ABDC in which the intake valve closes (from the cam card), you are making a very dangerous blanket statement that could result is someone destroying their engine. OR you want everyone to be as slow as you? Ahhhhh....I get it now....
Speaking of irrelevant....anyone who has an SHP 427 and only runs 11's....or dreams to one day...that is truly sad. You do know that, at this day and age there are LS engines with mere bolt ons running those times don't you? I thought my car was slow...
If I had that 427 SBC it would be running 9's thats a fact.
Who is trolling who ? You sound like one of a few guys from Digital corvette forum ... And I think you have been banned for your posts once maybe its time it happens again ?