4 tail light conversion on 69-72

I was thinking about trying to bond a shallow cap onto the white area and putting small bulb into it. Then re-extend the reverse light to this new bulb, and rewire the original backup socket to the outer brake lights. Anyone done something similar to this? What are your thoughts about this? Think it will work?
I have already bought the 1968 rear valance panel with the lights in it. I don't want to cut up my existing 1970 rear light harness. I plan to buy a new 1968 rear harness, put it in the 1968 and then put the old 1968 harness in the 1970. I'll probably have to cut some of the wires to splice the 1968 into the 1970 harness, but I can do that away from the lamps so curious people looking up into the car won't see a hay wire installation. The harness connection to the lamps will look stock Also, I expect to keep the fiberoptics.
bi-metal element. It heats - turns off - cools - back on - this is
how it flashes. When too much current is pulled (extra blinker) -
then it blinks faster (and flasher burns out faster). It is the
opposite problem with LED bulbs - which draw much less current
and thus may not flash at all. I think there is an 'electronic'
flasher that works with LEDs - and might work with an extra bulb, too.
To retain the backup lenses, you could go with a red LED
replacement bulb - but I would opt for matching lenses.
also I used the standard 1157 bulb and filed down (just a little) the tit on the one side that does not line up...a little tight going in but works great !! I love the look and feel much better at night !!
AND....... It's yours, do as you wish and ignore the rest !!
IF I had a numbers-matching machine, I'd likely make it a "proper" NCRS restoration. However, I bought mine without knowing all the finer points I do now, but at a reasonable price. Not an original engine. Not even an L-82, or Pace Car option. So...I figure go with what makes it better, faster, cooler, more enjoyable.
In a couple more years, after I'm done, it won't have a stock suspension or engine, the brakes will be better, and the radio will be too. The wheels, and general outside appearance will be stock (the better to fool the guy that thinks it is stock).
I happen to like the four-taillight look since it is reminiscent of the mid-years. Even the C4s went back to it. I figure it won't harm the value of the car, and really isn't 'Bubba-like' if done cleanly...(Bubba would put boat-trailer lights on the back end!!!)
Do it your way! I hope to compare sharks with you someday!!!
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Wow this is back up again.
I still maintain that the metal housings for the tail/stop light bulb or back up light bulb are simply NOT interchangeable. You cannot swap these bulbs. The housings are DO not accommodate either/ or both pin styles at the sides of these bulbs. This is not a guess, I know it and have shown this to many folk. A back-up bulb will not screw into a tail/stop lamp housing and visa versa. Why do you think the bulbs and housings were designed in this manner?
You could probably jury rig anything, however the consequences of ones engineering are sometimes unforeseen and can even be dangerous.
Thank Goodness we live in America and have a choice. Most folk can do whatever they like within reason. If ebay is any indication, those oldest models that are farthest from the original configuration generally do not achieve the highest return compared to others.
In my 30 years as a Corvette owner, I never heard of Bubba until I read this forum. I can honestly say, I did not give birth to his/her legendary achievements. And remember, I am merely the messenger, not the message.
Geoffrey Coenen
PS I read on another web site that the Governor of NJ admitted he was a fudge packer. Again, I am merely the messenger.

















