C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1978 Engine Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2017 | 06:33 PM
  #1  
samuel082799's Avatar
samuel082799
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 3
From: Poway California
Default 1978 Engine Build

I am planning out a future build on my 1978 corvette pace car and I live in California so it needs to pass smog. I have found all of the carb approved parts that I want. My question is that If all of the parts are carb approved and I use my smoger carburetor I should not be producing any more emissions than I am now because I will be using the same air fuel ratio I am now. And then I can Just have a different carburetor on it when it is not being smoged. Parts im looking at are:

AFR-1034 - AFR 195cc SBC Eliminator Street Heads
CCA-12-210-2 - COMP Cams High Energy Camshafts
CCA-1412-16 - COMP Cams Magnum Steel Roller Tip Rocker Arms
CLO-8-5100Q - Cloyes Timing Gear Sets
EDL-3701 - Edelbrock Performer Intake Manifolds
FEM-MHP127-000 - Federal Mogul Premium Engine Rebuild Kits
HED-68301 - Hedman Street Headers

The Parts in this list that are not carb approve are the intake, and the rebuild kit which includes Pistons, but i dont think those will affect much any way because I have heard of people grinding of the numbers on the intake and painting it and it looks just like the stock one. Any help with my predicament is very appreciated because I dont want to build an awesome engine and then it wont pass smog.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2017 | 04:36 PM
  #2  
jim2527's Avatar
jim2527
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Top Answer: 1
Top Answer: 3
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 19,347
Likes: 654
From: Tampa, Florida
Default

I believe that specific intake is considered a 'stock replacement part' therefore it doesn't need a C.A.R.B. number/sticker.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2017 | 08:04 PM
  #3  
biackbenz's Avatar
biackbenz
Drifting
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 126
From: Mequon WI
Default

I am a novice when it comes to carburetors. So I guess I'm asking more than offering a useable thought! The carburetor on the 78 has additional vacuum lines to operate the diverter valve on the air pump. I'm sure you will need to keep the air pump and you are using Headman headers with the air injection fittings. I don't see why this would affect your build in any negative way? Nor would I think the vacuum lines for the vapor canister would change anything.

So, why would you be concerned about the stock Rochester?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2017 | 10:54 PM
  #4  
samuel082799's Avatar
samuel082799
Thread Starter
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 69
Likes: 3
From: Poway California
Default

Originally Posted by biackbenz
I am a novice when it comes to carburetors. So I guess I'm asking more than offering a useable thought! The carburetor on the 78 has additional vacuum lines to operate the diverter valve on the air pump. I'm sure you will need to keep the air pump and you are using Headman headers with the air injection fittings. I don't see why this would affect your build in any negative way? Nor would I think the vacuum lines for the vapor canister would change anything.

So, why would you be concerned about the stock Rochester?
I was just thinking that the Rochester carb would not supply enough fuel for the increase in performance parts given that it is not adjustable.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 11:59 AM
  #5  
REELAV8R's Avatar
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1,171
From: Hermosa
Default

I don't think you have enough cam or intake volume to support the AFR 195 heads. I would use the AFR 180's.
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2017 | 12:09 PM
  #6  
ignatz's Avatar
ignatz
Safety Car
Supporting Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 1,578
From: los altos hills california
Default

Why not stroke it?
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To 1978 Engine Build





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE