Dyno hp -v- real hp
I know there is different transmission, tyre and rear ends ec, but still is the a guide line, for "normal" street fighter cars?
P.s not my engine :- )
Dynojet vs. Mustang dynos will give the same car different results. I would guess that Lab (engine) Dynos also vary in results from one brand to another.
A 400hp (gross) engine installed in a no option Corvette with only the water pump, alternator and a 4spd will give better RWHP results than the same 400hp engine installed in a highly optioned Corvette (PS, AC, A.I.R., Automatic).
I dynoed both my engine before and after rebuild and I also dynoed the chassis before and after the engine rebuild. I used the same engine and chassis dynos for both results.
285hp (gross) / 217 rwhp, a 23.85% loss
341hp (gross) / 245 rwhp, a 28.15% loss
You'll notice the weaker engine had less performance loss (23%) between gross and rwhp. That's because the standard Corvette exhaust can only flow X amount of air. The new stronger engine was capable of pushing more air, so the very same exhaust created a larger performance loss (28%). Had I installed a 600hp (gross) engine, the performance loss would have been even larger.
If I added headers after the rebuild, my performance loss would have been less. The variables are endless.
4.250" stroke
4.310" Bore
Edelbrock Street Heads
Intake valve diameter: 2.19"
Exhaust valve diameter: 1.88"
Compression Ration 9.8:1
Quick Fuel 830
LS6 Intake Manifold
Exhaust, Hedmen Headers under car to Mufflers
Cam Shaft,
Adv. Dur 288/294
.050” Duration 229/235
.200” Duration 145/147
Centers 103/111
LSA 107
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Also I don't have a dyno anywhere near my town and I have a similar build to DDawson.
If there's time, throw my numbers in there only if you have a chance please

4.250" stroke
4.310" Bore
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads
Intake valve diameter: 2.19"
Exhaust valve diameter: 1.88"
Compression Ration 10.4:1
Quick Fuel 1050 AN (Annular Booster)
LS6 Intake Manifold (Dual plane, low rise pancake)
Exhaust, Hedmen Headers under car to Mufflers
Cam Shaft, Hydraulic roller
Adv. Dur 294/300
.050” Duration 242/248
Lift .540/.560
LSA 110
Again, I'm curious to see actual vs.inputted and to see the cam and carb difference with DD.
Cheers
th 15-25% comment is typical trans tires etc have an effect. Wouldnt base your build on a dyno simulator
Last edited by cv67; Aug 7, 2017 at 11:26 AM.
4.250" stroke
4.310" Bore
Edelbrock Street Heads
Intake valve diameter: 2.19"
Exhaust valve diameter: 1.88"
Compression Ration 9.8:1
Quick Fuel 830
LS6 Intake Manifold
Exhaust, Hedmen Headers under car to Mufflers
Cam Shaft,
Adv. Dur 288/294
.050” Duration 229/235
.200” Duration 145/147
Centers 103/111
LSA 107

I will try, can you tell me the manufactor part number for the cam and the heads?
Also I don't have a dyno anywhere near my town and I have a similar build to DDawson.
If there's time, throw my numbers in there only if you have a chance please

4.250" stroke
4.310" Bore
Edelbrock Performer RPM heads
Intake valve diameter: 2.19"
Exhaust valve diameter: 1.88"
Compression Ration 10.4:1
Quick Fuel 1050 AN (Annular Booster)
LS6 Intake Manifold (Dual plane, low rise pancake)
Exhaust, Hedmen Headers under car to Mufflers
Cam Shaft, Hydraulic roller
Adv. Dur 294/300
.050” Duration 242/248
Lift .540/.560
LSA 110
Again, I'm curious to see actual vs.inputted and to see the cam and carb difference with DD.
Cheers
I would never build a engine based on dyno simulator, never :- )
I was just thinking, what is real life, and what does the dyno simulator say.
Last edited by c3_dk; Aug 7, 2017 at 02:55 PM.
Decent articles which starts to capture a lot of the factors affecting parasitic loss.
http://www.superstreetonline.com/how...in-power-loss/
http://www.hotrod.com/articles/ccrp-...in-power-loss/
Last edited by CPTCroaker; Aug 9, 2017 at 05:26 PM.


















