C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

u-joint strap torque confirmation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 14, 2018 | 09:57 PM
  #1  
vince vette 2's Avatar
vince vette 2
Thread Starter
Drifting
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 226
From: PA
Default u-joint strap torque confirmation

Since GM uses some different terminology, just to be safe I'd appreciate any confirmation someone could give that I'm reading the manual correctly for u-joint strap torques. specs from 1980 GM shop manual
What most of us call a drive shaft, I take it GM calls a propeller shaft. And they spec 30 ft-lb for the u-joint strap, which they call a retainer. Is that correct - it seems high for a 1310 Spicer u-joint.

Then for what we call half shafts GM calls a drive shaft. Since my cars an automatic the recommendation would be 15 ft-lb. Again seems a little high for Spicer 1330's. Spicer spec's 12 or 13 ft lb I believe.

Guidance is appreciated.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2018 | 11:03 PM
  #2  
A88FXRS's Avatar
A88FXRS
Racer
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 374
Likes: 12
From: PHILADELPHIA PA
Default

GM manual is correct. been using those torque values for 20 years on drivelines
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 09:36 AM
  #3  
vince vette 2's Avatar
vince vette 2
Thread Starter
Drifting
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 226
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by A88FXRS
GM manual is correct. been using those torque values for 20 years on drivelines
Actually, I just noticed something. Clearly there is an error in the table. Note that on one line it lists 28 N-m as 22 ft-lb and then on the next line it lists the lower metric value of 22 N-m as as a higher 30 ft-lb value. The correct conversions should be:

17 N-m to 13 ft-lb
28 N-m to 21 ft-lb
22 N-m to 16 ft-lb

The question then is which conversion is messed up, N-m to ft-lb or the reverse. My guess at this point is it's the N-m to ft-lb. I can believe the manual value should be the highest since on a 1980 the half shaft would have been a Spicer 1350 U-joint with a 5/16 bolt while the half shaft on an automatic used a 1330 and thus a 1/4" bolt, the same bolt as the drive shaft which used 1310's for both transmissions.

I guess since the bolt dominates the torque requirement and since the the 1310's and 30's use the same bolt I will stick with the lower torques. Of course, then the question becomes which is right, the 17 N-m or 15 ft-lb since they are not equivalent. Splitting the diffeence would be 14 ft-lb which happens to me an engineering recommendation for a 1/4-28 bolt, unplated and unlubed. As good a guess as an any. Chalk up one more error in the shop manual.

Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 02:39 PM
  #4  
REELAV8R's Avatar
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1,171
From: Hermosa
Default

Originally Posted by vince vette 2
Actually, I just noticed something. Clearly there is an error in the table. Note that on one line it lists 28 N-m as 22 ft-lb and then on the next line it lists the lower metric value of 22 N-m as as a higher 30 ft-lb value. The correct conversions should be:

17 N-m to 13 ft-lb
28 N-m to 21 ft-lb
22 N-m to 16 ft-lb

The question then is which conversion is messed up, N-m to ft-lb or the reverse. My guess at this point is it's the N-m to ft-lb. I can believe the manual value should be the highest since on a 1980 the half shaft would have been a Spicer 1350 U-joint with a 5/16 bolt while the half shaft on an automatic used a 1330 and thus a 1/4" bolt, the same bolt as the drive shaft which used 1310's for both transmissions.

I guess since the bolt dominates the torque requirement and since the the 1310's and 30's use the same bolt I will stick with the lower torques. Of course, then the question becomes which is right, the 17 N-m or 15 ft-lb since they are not equivalent. Splitting the diffeence would be 14 ft-lb which happens to me an engineering recommendation for a 1/4-28 bolt, unplated and unlubed. As good a guess as an any. Chalk up one more error in the shop manual.
I think the important part is to not put so much torque on the strap that it deforms the u-joint bearing. The strap does the work and the bolt just needs to be tight enough to hold it there.

I use blue locktite to insure the bolt stays in place and an inch-pound torque wrench to tighten them since 15 ft-lbs would be hard to achieve on a ft-lb wrench since it is such a low value. French locks would also keep the bolts in place, if you got them.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 03:27 PM
  #5  
vince vette 2's Avatar
vince vette 2
Thread Starter
Drifting
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 226
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by REELAV8R
I think the important part is to not put so much torque on the strap that it deforms the u-joint bearing. The strap does the work and the bolt just needs to be tight enough to hold it there.

I use blue locktite to insure the bolt stays in place and an inch-pound torque wrench to tighten them since 15 ft-lbs would be hard to achieve on a ft-lb wrench since it is such a low value. French locks would also keep the bolts in place, if you got them.
Thanks for the reply. I am using a an in-lb wrench for these as I agree that these levels are down in the mud for most ft-lb level graduated tools.

I guess this confusion is due to trying to do things right. About 20 years ago I pulled the half shafts off the spindle yokes and pulled the spindle yokes off to grease the spindle bearings (let's avoid the debate on that). I had no torque wrenches so for the spindle nuts I just counted the turns taking them off and then put back on the same number of turns. And for the u-joint strap bolts I just tightened as best I could with whatever little box wrench fit. Nothing ever fell off in the 5 or 6 years of driving I did after that.

Fast forward to today and I bought the wrenches for this rebuild project figuring that I can't wing torques on everything I do. Interestingly, when I put the strap bolts in this time I used a small box wrench as before just to tighten them up before going to the torque wrench which I had set initially to 140 in-lb. On the first bolt it clicked almost as soon as it started to turn. So I guess I wasn't too far off 20 years ago.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 04:23 PM
  #6  
REELAV8R's Avatar
REELAV8R
Le Mans Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1,171
From: Hermosa
Default

Originally Posted by vince vette 2
Thanks for the reply. I am using a an in-lb wrench for these as I agree that these levels are down in the mud for most ft-lb level graduated tools.

I guess this confusion is due to trying to do things right. About 20 years ago I pulled the half shafts off the spindle yokes and pulled the spindle yokes off to grease the spindle bearings (let's avoid the debate on that). I had no torque wrenches so for the spindle nuts I just counted the turns taking them off and then put back on the same number of turns. And for the u-joint strap bolts I just tightened as best I could with whatever little box wrench fit. Nothing ever fell off in the 5 or 6 years of driving I did after that.

Fast forward to today and I bought the wrenches for this rebuild project figuring that I can't wing torques on everything I do. Interestingly, when I put the strap bolts in this time I used a small box wrench as before just to tighten them up before going to the torque wrench which I had set initially to 140 in-lb. On the first bolt it clicked almost as soon as it started to turn. So I guess I wasn't too far off 20 years ago.

Been there. I probably wrenched on my cars for 15 years before I ever owned a torque wrench either. Never used locktite and never had anything fall off. Even changed heads without a torque wrench, lol.

But I figure now I'm of the mind better safe than sorry now, and I can afford these things so why not have them and use them.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2018 | 06:38 PM
  #7  
vince vette 2's Avatar
vince vette 2
Thread Starter
Drifting
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 226
From: PA
Default

Originally Posted by REELAV8R
Been there. I probably wrenched on my cars for 15 years before I ever owned a torque wrench either. Never used locktite and never had anything fall off. Even changed heads without a torque wrench, lol.

But I figure now I'm of the mind better safe than sorry now, and I can afford these things so why not have them and use them.

Last edited by vince vette 2; Jun 15, 2018 at 06:39 PM.
Reply

Get notified of new replies

To u-joint strap torque confirmation





All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.

story-0
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-2
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-3
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-5
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-6
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 C9 Corvette MUST-HAVES to Fix These C8 Generation Flaws!

Slideshow: the top 10 things Corvette owners want in the C9 Corvette

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-30 12:41:15


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Revolutionary 'Corvette Firsts' Most People Don't Know

Slideshow: 10 Important Corvette 'firsts' that every fan should know.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 17:02:16


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Reasons to Upgrade to an LS6-Powered Corvette; 5 Reasons to Stay LT2

Slideshow: Should you buy a 2020-2026 Corvette or wait for 2027?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 10:08:58


VIEW MORE