When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I PROJECT TO HOT ROD MY 68 L36 427ci WITH A STROCKER CRANK FROM SCAT .
longer strock 4.5 " (stock 3.75) and 0.535 rods
does any body has already do such modification?
how does the engine rev with such modication ?
much more torque compare to the stock 460 F/ lbs?
how many HP gain ?
thanks for any advice ,information of your car with this engine of modification
Generally the longest stroke that you can install in a stock 427 style block is 4.25 inches and they are used to make 496-508 ci big blocks. I've read that if the only component that you change is more cubic inches of diplacement by stroking and everything else being the same. You have no rise in power. Just the same amount at a lower rpm. If you don't increase it's breathing ability you'll stay the same.
Welcome to the Forum! First of all, I doubt that you will get any more horse power from such a stroke increase, but you will get a boat load of torque. In my opinion, it will be more of a truck motor with that much longer stroke.
I would encourage you to get Desk Top Dyno 2000 software. You can plug in all these different parts and specs and get a rough idea of what the changes will do. It is a lot of fun to play with.
I have read that too but find that hard to believe. If true than wouldn't a 0" crank have as much power as a 3.75" crank? Ridiculous but isn't that what that is saying? Has to be some limit to that theory or my 0" crank joke would apply. If not, I am building a super destroked 1/4" throw crank big block and be the fastest vette ever. :rolleyes:
I have read that too but find that hard to believe. If true than wouldn't a 0" crank have as much power as a 3.75" crank? Ridiculous but isn't that what that is saying? Has to be some limit to that theory or my 0" crank joke would apply. If not, I am building a super destroked 1/4" throw crank big block and be the fastest vette ever. :rolleyes:
[Modified by Fevre, 2:59 PM 11/5/2002]
Fevre,
Zero is Zero, wouldn't make any difference what the bore was. This would be the same as an engine with a broken crank. Yet within reasonable limits, the stroke determines what the rpm will be that makes the most hp. A 2" crank would probably develop about the same power as a 3.76" crank, but would you want a torqeless monster that needs to be spun to 15,000 rpm?
I understand 0 is 0 but your point about revving to 15,000 is more of what I am after. Has to be some limit to that theory.
Yeah, the pistons would probably melt, the valve springs would have to be so strong you would lose power turning the cam unless you spent Merlin $$ on light weight titanium hollow stem pieces. Is there an oil that good yet? I think my nerves would also give out spinning it that high just waiting for something to let loose. :yesnod:
Isn't the 6.535" con-rod a little long for a 4.5" stroke? That would need a piston w/ a compression height of 1.01". I've been looking at pistons for my BBC, and the smallest I've found is 1.1". Maybe there are some custom pistons you could get though...
Benjamin, sorry, but you will never fit a decent piston, rod, and 4.5" crank into a stock deck height 9.8" block. You will need a tall deck 10.2" block.
With the '68 427 block, you will even have a hard time fitting a 4.25" stroke because the '68 427s didn't have the same crank throw and rod clearances cut into the block that a 454 and later 427 has.
Whenever I rebuild my '68 L36, I will probably go with the 4.25" stroker, but I don't expect it to be easy :D
This piston has a 1.27" compression height, and it's sized for a stock deck height (9.8") 4.25" stroke, and a 6.385" rod.
Your proposed piston would have to be .275" shorter, and the pin would be way under the rings. It might be possible, but I don't think it's a good idea if you have other options.