When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Just FYI...the stock sidepipes for 1969 will not support but about 350/360 horsepower with the manifolds on a small block.....very restrictive setup for being so short.
I recommend the stock 69' Off Road covers with Hooker headers and a retro fit VettePak muffler.
As stated.....stay away from the Hooker sidepipes if you enjoy driving the car long distances.....the noise can sink in after a while. The race insert is the only insert that flows and it is very loud.
The runner length of the pipes becomes an issue at higher power levels......
I love the Hooker exhaust and was on the fence for my 72' 406....but ultimately the undercar exhaust ruled out for the reasons I mentioned.
Just FYI...the stock sidepipes for 1969 will not support but about 350/360 horsepower with the manifolds on a small block.....very restrictive setup for being so short.
...Jebby
Based on my experience, I'm uncertain if they support even that much. I admit to being a side-pipe fan... BUT. Dyno results jive with seat of the pants - engine goes flat at about 4500 rpm. I don't make a habit of really cranking the car, so generally don't notice.
I'd like to get real data so I'll probably wander back to 'Dyno Don' and see if we can get some back-pressure numbers with the factory side exhaust, and then replace with the original, under-the-car exhaust, and measure both back pressure and do a dyno run to compare all the results. Piggie a few days before 48th birthday, 30 June 1970.
As stated.....stay away from the Hooker sidepipes if you enjoy driving the car long distances.....the noise can sink in after a while. The race insert is the only insert that flows and it is very loud.
From: Loud, Raw and Dangerous 1968 327 4S in Southern California
We always hated parking next to the guy in the Corvette club that had the side pipes. He would blow dirt and leaves all over the other cars. Also the posters are right about only burning your leg once...however for me the scar lasted 30 years. They do look cool though.
We always hated parking next to the guy in the Corvette club that had the side pipes. He would blow dirt and leaves all over the other cars. Also the posters are right about only burning your leg once...however for me the scar lasted 30 years. They do look cool though.
Redvette2
I could see that happening with the OEM style side pipes, the exhaust is angled down. On the Hooker header side pipes it blows straight out parallel to the ground.
I could see that happening with the OEM style side pipes, the exhaust is angled down. On the Hooker header side pipes it blows straight out parallel to the ground.
Indeed, the stock pipes do blow dust up onto the car, and others. On a dark color car, it’s something to bear in mind. I gladly put up with it on my 350/350 4sp
I recently picked up a numbers matching all original 1969 350 4speed and am contemplating installing side pipes, but my mechanic is telling me to stay away from them as they are more problems than their worth. Specifically around the following:
more heat coming into the cabin than usual.
burning legs when getting out.
not being able to lift the car up easily if needed as the pipes / headers get in the way of where the platform would sit.
pipes being too low to the ground and hitting them on slight inclines, driveways, potholes, etc.
potential of it taking away from the overall resale value.
Thoughts? Has anyone else been in the same dilemma? More specifically around the ground clearance and being able to lift the car up if needed.
Any comments are appreciated!
I'm not sure if this is just my car, in that it needs a better tune up, or it's a factor of the side pipes... I notice I reek of exhaust/unburnt fuel when I get out of the car. I assume that it's because the side pipes are dumping the exhaust closer to the cabin.
Having said that, I love the side exhaust. I don't mind the smell, I love the sound and the way the car looks. On the topic of the ground clearance, my understanding was that they were originally put on the cars so that they could be lowered for better ground clearance
On a different level, sidepipes change the overall character of the car. Adding sidepipes changes the car from 'nice fun boulevard cruiser' to 'angry wild bad *** beast'! There are some times when you want either one. That is what I wanted when I installed mine and I love them … but not always. Sometimes when me and the wife are going out to dinner they are a bit much. When pulling into a car show.. well they're just right.
I figure if I get tired of them I'll switch them out to regular under car exhaust but for now I'm enjoying them.
I bought side pipes. Had them for one summer and sold them. Looks great but loud as hell. Burned legs & almost died of carbon monoxide poisoning. OEM is back on and so are my hearing 😉
I love the hooker sidepipes and spiral baffles on mine. Uncapped the baffles are too loud for the street, but capped they aren't too bad. As everyone says though, they are leg burners
I can lift my car up very easily with the sidepipes. It's easy to get a jack on the frame rail right near the collector and lift. I find there is way less heat in the car with them and the car is a lot easier to work on without exhaust in the way. I have never had a ground clearance issue with side pipes. I scraped the under car exhaust a lot. Finally, you will only burn your leg once, unless you're a very slow learner. This is the only aspect that concerns me as I would hate to have someone getting a ride get a lasting leg tattoo commemorating the experience.
Originally Posted by Tampa Jerry
If you get factory side pipes you will not burn your legs. Hooker pipes are another matter. Jerry
Originally Posted by MelWff
I have had sidepipes on my 69 since about 1974.
more heat coming into the cabin than usual.. Not true.
burning legs when getting out. You and your passengers have to be conscious of the pipes when getting in or out.
not being able to lift the car up easily if needed as the pipes / headers get in the way of where the platform would sit. You either jack the car up in the rear at the center of the spring or in the front from the leading or trailing edge of the front crossmember, not the center of the crossmember or under a control arm.
pipes being too low to the ground and hitting them on slight inclines, driveways, potholes, etc. Have not had an issue.
potential of it taking away from the overall resale value. Keep the old system to sell with the car.
Originally Posted by jokeitch
heat shields are a very good thing, but can get very spendy
I haven't had any of the issues your mechanic has described. You only burn your legs once.
Originally Posted by 69ttop502
I have had both on my 69. Now I have a very high horsepower car, but found the sidepipes very restrictive. In order to keep my power, I had it so loud I didn’t want to drive it. I have done a ton of Dyno testing with sidepipe setups. If you are using mufflers, a good undercar system will always make more hp than sidepipes. Looks are a toss up, love them both. But I would never go back to sidepipes.
Originally Posted by CA-Legal-Vette
If you go with stock style sidepipes, the only real downsides are cost of the setup and noise. You probably won’t recover the cost of the setup on resale but it’ll likely increase the value vs a car with rear exhaust.
Originally Posted by jim-81
more heat in the cabin - no, less if anything
burning legs - yes there is potential for that
lifting the car - possibly more difficult because the pipes come out where you would normally place the jack but you just move the jack rearward. Jack stand location is fine ahead of the pipes
pipes too low - no, the header pipes are smaller in diameter, if anything sidepipes help with ground clearance
affect resale value - YES PROBABLY with a numbers matching all original 1969
Side pipes are bad *** basically, they look cool and sound cool and there are only a handful of cars that can look good wearing them of which the C3 Corvette is at the top (or Cobra).
Jim
Originally Posted by dosoctaves
Listen to your mechanic!
Originally Posted by REELAV8R
I also have had none of the issues you mechanic mentioned.
as far as burning, that is what heat shields are for.
he may or may not be a decent mechanic, but his comments regarding side pipes are not accurate, except resale value, that may be true. However if I was buying a 69 I would be much more likely to buy it if it had side pipes vs standard exhaust.
going back to rear exhaust is not even an option on my 77, they are there to stay. Working on anything under the car is far easier due to the lack of exhaust pipes in the way.
Originally Posted by Bikespace
Get the sidepipes! But make sure you get shields, too. I made my own system for $100- or so. You'll probably want to get the period appropriate system from Keen.
Who lifts their car from the side?
Don't worry about resale until you sell it, which you won't want to do with sidepipes.
Originally Posted by rvzio
I just like the look and sound!
ZIO
Originally Posted by cooper9811
If you want'em, put'em on. The only comment from your mechanic that has any real merit is resale value - but as mentioned, keep the old exhaust if that one concerns you. Everything else is, as others have said, can be mitigated with heat shields or is just plain wrong.
I love my Hookers (exhaust that is) - I have a rubber bumper car and love mine, but I think they look especially good on a chrome bumper corvette. I say do it!
Originally Posted by talentscout
I have a 1969 that came from the factory with side pipes. Interesting fact 1969 is the only year C3 that came from factory with side pipes. I also have a lift in my garage and it is slightly more difficult with side pipes. Mine are factory side pipes and they will not burn your legs however my daughter has a factory five cobra with side pipes and not only have I burned my leg on them but more than once I've pulled up in it had a lot of young kids come close and felt like I couldn't leave the car I was so worried one of them would touch the pipes. I only drove my car a few times before deciding to tear it down and do a full frame off. Mine is also a 350/350 4 sd. I saw your more recent post and I plan to keep my recently rebuilt numbers matching 350 but change out the cam and heads and go with Holley fuel injection. I really hope I don't grenade it!
Originally Posted by pltmgr
If you wear short pants (or a dress) it easy to burn your legs. When I'm in jeans, less likely. I don't like 69 factory side pipes but love Hooker Header pipes. Save he factory exhaust if originality is a concern.
Originally Posted by Jebbysan
Just FYI...the stock sidepipes for 1969 will not support but about 350/360 horsepower with the manifolds on a small block.....very restrictive setup for being so short.
I recommend the stock 69' Off Road covers with Hooker headers and a retro fit VettePak muffler.
As stated.....stay away from the Hooker sidepipes if you enjoy driving the car long distances.....the noise can sink in after a while. The race insert is the only insert that flows and it is very loud.
The runner length of the pipes becomes an issue at higher power levels......
I love the Hooker exhaust and was on the fence for my 72' 406....but ultimately the undercar exhaust ruled out for the reasons I mentioned.
Jebby
Originally Posted by Redvette2
We always hated parking next to the guy in the Corvette club that had the side pipes. He would blow dirt and leaves all over the other cars. Also the posters are right about only burning your leg once...however for me the scar lasted 30 years. They do look cool though.
Redvette2
Originally Posted by Chambered
I LOVE the look of the stock 68-9 sidepipes. They were SO nicely styled! My 3" bodied mufflers will fit under those covers.
Originally Posted by red topless gator
Your correct on that one unless you are a dumbass and burn your shin while lifting the hood. Ask me how I know.
Originally Posted by cuisinartvette
If you dig sidepipes just get them. 70s coolness!
Do some really debate resale before putting on a part they really want?
Originally Posted by jim-81
On a different level, sidepipes change the overall character of the car. Adding sidepipes changes the car from 'nice fun boulevard cruiser' to 'angry wild bad *** beast'! There are some times when you want either one. That is what I wanted when I installed mine and I love them … but not always. Sometimes when me and the wife are going out to dinner they are a bit much. When pulling into a car show.. well they're just right.
I figure if I get tired of them I'll switch them out to regular under car exhaust but for now I'm enjoying them.
Originally Posted by Fredric Björnefält
I bought side pipes. Had them for one summer and sold them. Looks great but loud as hell. Burned legs & almost died of carbon monoxide poisoning. OEM is back on and so are my hearing 😉
Originally Posted by Corvettedave02
I love the hooker sidepipes and spiral baffles on mine. Uncapped the baffles are too loud for the street, but capped they aren't too bad. As everyone says though, they are leg burners
Originally Posted by REELAV8R
I seriously don't understand all you guys burning your legs.This is what heat shields are for.
I have had mine on for 9-10 years and NOBODY has burned their legs.
Thanks for all the input guys! Loving this thread. lol sounds like everyone has scars on the back of their legs...lol
I've decided to go with side-pipes.
I have always thought that they made our cars look heavy, or fat, but it is all just a matter of personal preference/taste.
Thats why you need fender flares. Hooker style sidepipes with L88 flares turn a c3 from a cool old car to a menacing beast that would intimidate any modern exotic sports car
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.