When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (Metal_Wulf)
Don't know the specs on those cams but as a rule the roller cams are better all around the only problem is they are three times as expensive.
OK just read the specs, as you can see with the roller you can get a higher lift with the same duration. This is because the ramp can be steeper because of the roller.
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (Metal_Wulf)
If you look at the .050" numbers, the XE256 is actually a closer match to the XR264. I'd say those numbers are a bit optimistic for the XR264, but the roller is much better IMO.
Wider powerband, better fuel economy, easier on valvetrain.
St. Jude Donor '05-'06-'07-'08-'09-'10-'11-'12-'13-'14-'15
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (Metal_Wulf)
I have the XE262 in my engine with just about the same setup you mention with the exception that I have a Holley Street Avenger 670 carb and shorty headers with 2 1/2 in. exhaust. So far I have about 50 miles on the engine and so far so good. I was wondering what kind of numbers this combo would put out. I think the XE262 kinda sounds a little rumpier than stock.
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (Metal_Wulf)
On another thread, someone (sorry, don't recall which thread or the poster) someone mentioned that DD2k assumes that ANY roller cam is ground with a all out race profile. As a result, even though valve events are listed correctly, it will give an overly optimistic rating for street type roller cams. Having said that, I would still expect a roller cam that had similar drivability characteristics to make noticeably more power. Looking at it another way, the roller cam that makes the same same power as a flat tappet cam will have better drivability.
If cost (bang for your buck) is an issue, the flat tappet XE (or something similar) will likely provide more hp per dollar than a roller. If I had your set up, I'd be inclined to use the flat tappet and put the $$ saved into a converter, shift kit, and carb and ignition mods.
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (Vetterodder)
...that DD2k assumes that ANY roller cam is ground with a all out race profile. As a result, even though valve events are listed correctly, it will give an overly optimistic rating for street type roller cams.
Can you input the specs. of a roller cam into a tappet cam profile? Would that at least get you closer?
Re: Cam question... XE262H or XR264HR ?? (69stingray)
...that DD2k assumes that ANY roller cam is ground with a all out race profile. As a result, even though valve events are listed correctly, it will give an overly optimistic rating for street type roller cams.
Can you input the specs. of a roller cam into a tappet cam profile? Would that at least get you closer?
That's what was suggested on the other thread that I referred to and it makes sense to me. You still need to determine which type though (high performance street, dual purpose street/strip, etc.). I have an XE-274 and find that DD's figures are more representative of it's actual power band if I select high performance street rather than street/strip.