Crate Motor Cam needed
You could get dozens of suggestions, but how many are spot on?
In other words, no one is likely to have your exact engine build. Your exact trans & convertor. And your exact rear ratio.
So, seldom to never are you comparing apples to apples.
That is why all cam companies have tech helpers and about 20 questions to ask you about what parts you have and what you want out of them.
Keep at it with Comp Cams research. They get hundreds of request a day. Better to get it perfect the first time than . . . . . .
248 intake and 254 exhaust. Is this measured at .050 lift?
If so that's pretty good size cam for a 355 CI engine.
If it was my engine I would install a new cam with about 15-20 degrees less on both the intake and exhaust. With the 110 it will still have a bit of a chop.
248 intake and 254 exhaust. Is this measured at .050 lift?
If so that's pretty good size cam for a 355 CI engine.
If it was my engine I would install a new cam with about 15-20 degrees less on both the intake and exhaust. With the 110 it will still have a bit of a chop.
Thanks for the input. One I'm looking at is about 24 degrees less on int,/ex
comp extreme energy hydraulic roller 224/230 - 110
1900-5600
That 248/254* duration is at .050" right?
Your cam is extreme on the high rpm side, and your gears are very low on the rpm side. They do not play well together at all.
Your choice is to go all-in on extreme, or all-in on mild, or meet in the middle.
That big cam needs basically 411s or 370s, minimum. And it will still be nasty, and want to rev to 7K.
If you are going to short-shift it at 5500, you are only using half of it's power range.
I for one like your new 224/230* dur cam choice.
It's a good streetable performance cam, with a lope.
Especially if you are never going to rev it past 5500. It will pull hard a little past that.
It will hit hard at 1900rpm within the range of your 2200 convertor.
It goes well with a 650 DP carb.
But it still will not like the 2.87 gears nearly as much as the very mild stock cam did.
As long as you also change the gears, to 336-355-370, then it will run fantastic!
And that combo will probably kick the big cams butt below 60 mph!
That 248/254* duration is at .050" right?
Your cam is extreme on the high rpm side, and your gears are very low on the rpm side. They do not play well together at all.
Your choice is to go all-in on extreme, or all-in on mild, or meet in the middle.
That big cam needs basically 411s or 370s, minimum. And it will still be nasty, and want to rev to 7K.
If you are going to short-shift it at 5500, you are only using half of it's power range.
I for one like your new 224/230* dur cam choice.
It's a good streetable performance cam, with a lope.
Especially if you are never going to rev it past 5500. It will pull hard a little past that.
It will hit hard at 1900rpm within the range of your 2200 convertor.
It goes well with a 650 DP carb.
But it still will not like the 2.87 gears nearly as much as the very mild stock cam did.
As long as you also change the gears, to 336-355-370, then it will run fantastic!
And that combo will probably kick the big cams butt below 60 mph!
as soon as I get the cam in and running right, after 500 miles I'm putting a new Differential and stub axel. I have been looking at 2, not sure which just yet 3.31 or 3.54, maybe more or less, I will cross that bridge after 500 miles and more research
thanks again
Do some research and make sure your timing and distributor are set up correctly for your engine.
Also look for any major vacuum leaks, especially between the intake and block.
Before you decide on any particular cam, make the decision on what gears you plan to run otherwise you may end up changing the cam again.
Why, because it’s like everyone has been trying to explain to you (but failing to make their point) is that the cam and gearing need to work together.
Also decide on what you are using the car for, your driving style and also how you plan to use the car.
You’ll want different gears if you want to cruise on the highway and different gears if you want an in town hot rod going from light to light.
Different cams as well.
Look at more than lift and duration on the specs.
Your cam choice should also work with your engine’s compression ratio, heads, intake and all the components, including the torque converter.
Building a performance engine is a science and I’ve seen shops who build beautiful cars, but know nothing about building the engines they install in them.
And sometimes the advice they give isn’t always the best.
Be patient and talk with Comp Cams tech support before you make your choice
Have a plan and make a decision on your rear end gearing before you call them otherwise they might tell you to call back after you decide.
Another important item to consider, is you need to know what valve springs and lifters that are currently installed in your engine.
Many engine manufacturers will install higher spring pressures than what is necessary, which work good in a racing engine but don’t work well in a street engine and the higher spring pressures can shorten the life of your valve train components.
What ever cam you choose, match it with the valve springs, rockers and lifters that Comp Cams suggest.
And always check your pushrod lengths any time you change any component in the valve train.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
Im building a 406 now and ill be using a larger summit 1223 retro roller cam for that sinc the larger displacement allows it with less tradeoffs.
we spent hours going over different cam grinds for my engine, but once on the dyno, we found the cam was not building torque where we specifically wanted it, so we pulled the cam and went with a cam that actually had higher lift, but the other aspects of the cam caused the engine to make more torque at lower rpm, flattened the torque curve and made the engine build more power where we wanted it.
Im building a 406 now and ill be using a larger summit 1223 retro roller cam for that sinc the larger displacement allows it with less tradeoffs.
what software is that you are using?
Your current cam has a 3200-6200 rpm powerband. (A)
Your new projected cam has a 1900-5600 rpm powerband. (B)
Your original stock cam was more like 800-4800 (C)
Lets call them AB&C and see at what mph you hit that powerband in 1st gear with your current rear gear
2.78 gear:
(A) 37 mph
(B) 22 mph
(C) 10 mph
See the problem now? One cam hits hard at 10 mph and the other waits until 37 mph.
Your current cam could hit 80 mph, in first gear!
So on the sheet, you can look at those powerbands, and their mph speeds, with the different gear ratios.
The 3.36 & 3.55 & 3.70 look much better, up to 60 mph.
But as you change gears, from 2.78 on up to 3.70, your 70 mph cruising rpm goes up, a lot.
2400, 2650, 2900, 3100, and 3200.
It becomes harder and harder to have good stoplight rpm, and interstate cruising, without an overdrive trans.
Every modification is always a compromise, somewhere!
And only you can decide where that compromise should fall.
Good luck.
Your current cam has a 3200-6200 rpm powerband. (A)
Your new projected cam has a 1900-5600 rpm powerband. (B)
Your original stock cam was more like 800-4800 (C)
Lets call them AB&C and see at what mph you hit that powerband in 1st gear with your current rear gear
2.78 gear:
(A) 37 mph
(B) 22 mph
(C) 10 mph
See the problem now? One cam hits hard at 10 mph and the other waits until 37 mph.
Your current cam could hit 80 mph, in first gear!
So on the sheet, you can look at those powerbands, and their mph speeds, with the different gear ratios.
The 3.36 & 3.55 & 3.70 look much better, up to 60 mph.
But as you change gears, from 2.78 on up to 3.70, your 70 mph cruising rpm goes up, a lot.
2400, 2650, 2900, 3100, and 3200.
It becomes harder and harder to have good stoplight rpm, and interstate cruising, without an overdrive trans.
Every modification is always a compromise, somewhere!
And only you can decide where that compromise should fall.
Good luck.
The cam change will make the biggest difference.
Instead of hitting the powerband at 37mph, it'll happen 15 mph sooner at 22 mph.
The gear change will help that some, but not as much..
Instead of hitting the powerband at 22 mph, it'll happen 4 mph sooner, at 18 mph, with the 3.36 gears.
At least that one is a tolerable highway gear. 2900 @ 70.





I've flown across the great plains in America at some extremely high speeds, RPM's be damned! All day long accross South Dakota, Wyoming, Montana. Seriously no issues.
I've run hard from Brisbane to Cairns in Australia. About a thousand miles each way. Running 70 -75 MPH and RPM's well above 3K. My car LOVES it! It's singing in it's sweet spot right around 85 MPH.
Why the bloody hell is everyone so afraid of a few RPM's?
These cars where designed this way!
I say, let em Snap!
The cam change will make the biggest difference.
Instead of hitting the powerband at 37mph, it'll happen 15 mph sooner at 22 mph.
The gear change will help that some, but not as much..
Instead of hitting the powerband at 22 mph, it'll happen 4 mph sooner, at 18 mph, with the 3.36 gears.
At least that one is a tolerable highway gear. 2900 @ 70.
thanks again
Howard 180255-10
2200-5800
231/235 @ .50
510/530 lift
110 lobe separation
The other cam I'm looking at
Comp Extreme Energy
1900-5600
224/230 @ .50
502/510 lift
110 lobe separation
When speaking with them i was told they didn't have the Howard in stock so they substituted which was their mistake. Someone less experienced pull the wrong substitution and I wound up the the monster cam I now have.
I asked if any other substitution changes were made like springs, push rod or rockers and was told no. I will however be reimbursed for the price of the Howard cam and something for labor but I doubt that will be much.
I don't see a whole lot of difference in these 2 cams but I am not that experienced.
I have a 2200-2800 stall converter in now that was hoping to tame the big cam. If I leave this converter in and use the Comp Cam, will my stall converter affect the performance or are the numbers close enough.
Will I get a good lope at idle with either cam?
The cam change will make the biggest difference.
Instead of hitting the powerband at 37mph, it'll happen 15 mph sooner at 22 mph.
The gear change will help that some, but not as much..
Instead of hitting the powerband at 22 mph, it'll happen 4 mph sooner, at 18 mph, with the 3.36 gears.
At least that one is a tolerable highway gear. 2900 @ 70.
3.55 gears 3084rpm @ 70mph
3.36 gears 2919rpm @ 70mph
Not a big difference, both are tolerable but still undecided. Would there be much difference in bottom end take off ?
Your cam choose 1900-5600 would probably work better with the 3.55 but if you go with the 3.36 you might look at cams that come on at 1500.
I know a lot of people worry about wanting a cam that creates choppy idle.
You should worry less about a choppy idle and more about how the cam performs and where it produces power.
My 496 has very little or no chop at idle, but everyone instantly knows it is a monster as soon as I push the go peddle, even a little.














