When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I bought a set of used edelbrock performer rpm heads from a friend of mine.
They need a valve job but otherwise look pretty good. I was going to replace
my stock heads with them but I wanted to run it passed you guys to see what
you think about the combo. They are 64cc with 170cc chambers. My jasper engine has flat top pistons and 76cc heads. I think that will bring me to 10:1 from 8.5:1 Is that right? Also my engine has a dual pattern cam here are the specs
050 214 224
dur 280 290
Lift 443 465
Lobe Center Intake 107
Lobe Center exhaust 117
I have a ZZ4 intake and a holley 650 to go with the combo.
Does this sound good?
they are 64cc chambers w/ 170cc intake runners. So, the chamber is smaller by 12cc from what you have now. Your compression will go up even more, around 11:1 or even higher (I'm lazy, don't feel like calculating :) )
That cam you have is more of a torque cam, with that high compression you can run a much longer cam without loosing too much low rpm torque.
Somewhere around 220 @.050 or even a bit longer would be nice, stick around what you now have for seat durations.
The seperation angle is (LCA or LSA) 112 { (107 +117)/2 } the overlap is 61 degrees.
Your cam has 5 degrees of advance groud into it.
I was hoping not to have replace the cam. Oh well I can save the heads for another project or even sell them. What aftermarket heads would work better with this combo?
10:1 sounds about right, but it depends on your deck height and gasket thickness also. There's a formula to calculate static CR that I've seen in several places but can't think where right now. Anyway, it sounds like a pretty good combo.
The tricky thing is that with a short cam the cranking pressure and cylinder pressures at low RPM might be very high (needing a start retard to be able to start it)
Are you sure about the 10:1 with 76cc and flat tops? Sounds a bit high for 76cc heads. Was it spec'ed like that or is this a guess? I would guess it'd be closer to 8 or 8,5. Is the block decked (height?) what thickness gasket, how large (cc) are the valve reliefs ? do you have all the specs for your engine?
EDIT!!
Oh wait, it's 8.5 now.. I completely misread that. Yes, then it will be around 10:1 and you will be fine. i thought it was 10:1 now.. geez, I should read better. You will be fine with 10:1 and that cam.
The engine specs from Jasper say flat top pistons with approx 8.7:1 . I'm assuming the 0.2:1 comes from decking the block. No I don't have all the specs for my engine one drawback to buying a crate motor.
static compression ratio is just a calculation. It's the compression factor when you take into account a 100% filled cylinder volume with the piston down the bore:
The volume w/ piston at bottom dead center is:
4" wide (for stock bore) cylinder with a height of: 3,48 (stroke) + deck height (around 0,025 for stock) + head gasket compressed thickness (usually around 0,036 or so for common fel-pro) + valve relief volume + head volume ( minus spark plug volume if you are really thorough)
Then this set against the volume at the top dead center which is again a 4" wide cylinder with a height of deck height + compressed gasket thickness + valve relief volume + chamber size ( - spark plug size)
It's just a number to give an idea.
Dynamic compression takes into account the valve events, intake and exhaust efficiency and so on. DCR is related to cranking pressure. SCR not.
simply put, it's the compression ratio from compressing the volume above the piston when it's at it's lowest point to when it's at the highest point :)
Tony...get the heads redone and put them on your engine...your compression should be right around 9.8 with the 64cc chambers, very tolerable with the alum. heads..you won't believe the difference! :yesnod:
From: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Re: ? for engine guru's (TTop Tony)
I bought a set of used edelbrock performer rpm heads from a friend of mine.
They need a valve job but otherwise look pretty good. I was going to replace
my stock heads with them but I wanted to run it passed you guys to see what
you think about the combo. They are 64cc with 170cc chambers. My jasper engine has flat top pistons and 76cc heads. I think that will bring me to 10:1 from 8.5:1 Is that right? Also my engine has a dual pattern cam here are the specs
050 214 224
dur 280 290
Lift 443 465
Lobe Center Intake 107
Lobe Center exhaust 117
I have a ZZ4 intake and a holley 650 to go with the combo.
Does this sound good?
Chevy sells the ZZ4 (aluminum heads) with 10:1 and alot smaller cam. Assuming yours has 112 lobe separation produces 61 degrees overlap, ZZ4 only 54 degrees overlap. The greater overlap of longer duration cams reduces the effects of pre-ignition from high compression. Don't see any trouble with the 10:1 compression but expect lopey idle. :thumbs:
Sorry Frosty but it sounds like the heads are a decent match for my combo after all. Thanks guys now all I need to do is save up some $$ for the valve job. :thumbs:
hey stalker those blacked out rims really look sharp on that car
From: Who says "Nothing is impossible" ? I've been doing nothing for years.
Re: ? for engine guru's (TTop Tony)
Yea get the heads redone you will reaaly notice a difference, well worth it. If you can swing a cam upgrade a CC 270H or similar is a good match if you have opened up exhaust.
I agree that black car with the black rims looks :cool:
nah, the weight savings are just a nice bonus. What really is neat about them is the much better chamber design than what you have now (assuming they're 76cc smog heads) and with the alu you can run about a point higher compression without problems. The heads will make much more power.
Well the 75's were pretty heavy so every ounce counts. Reckon it would be worth the money to have them professionally ported along with the valve job or are the Edelbrock heads pretty good as is?
porting will always give good gains if it's fone right but it's expensive. If you are not trying to squeeze every last but of performance out of the engine and sticking with something like under 350Hp or I'd just slap them on as they are. Check the intake and exhaust for casting flash and maybe some restrivtions in the bowl.If you want to those can be cleaned up pretty easily. Just taking the die grinder in there and altering the runner shape will probably do more bad than good. Porting is not exact science and only someone w/ a lot of experience and a flow bench can do a top job.