462 bouble hump heads
Of course, 25 years ago, we couldn't call & get BRAND NEW aluminum heads shipped to our door, either!
Save your $$$, and get a set of GOOD heads when you can afford them. You 'may' get decent machine-work done {personally don't know of anybody who's had this done successfully}; then again, they may be 'junked' in the machining process, and then you'll be outta your $$$ AND have boat-anchors.
Unless you'll be running NHRA/IHRA 'class' racing, where you run a 'specific' head, or are restoring a numbers-matching C3, why use the 462s? Any of the after-market (and GM) heads have better technology (port-configuration), thicker deck-surfaces, etc., and are BRAND-NEW castings.....
Just my $.02 worth.....


Check the Chevy High Performance for their comparisons of all the aftermarket and stock heads available on the market. It will be in the Tech Arcticles.
I've got 462 camel hump heads (or as we call them here in Finland, "Mickey Mouse heads") installed on my 350 SB, and they've given me decent performance.
I was considering upgrading to Vortec heads, but in my research I came across the site http://www.kendrick-auto.com/head_flow_figures.htm where I found some interesting flow bench numbers comparing stock Vortecs with 462s that had basic pocket porting performed. What surprised me is that the difference isn't as huge as you might think.
GM 462 w/ Pocket Porting, 2.02 Intake/1.60 Exhaust
http://www.kendrick-auto.com/462_chevy_head.htm
Lift / Intake / Exhaust / EIR
0.050 / 45.4 / 25.5 / 56.1%
0.100 / 80.8 / 55.0 / 68.0%
0.200 / 127.1 / 109.1 / 85.5%
0.300 / 169.4 / 136.4 / 80.5%
0.400 / 202.0 / 158.9 / 78.6%
0.450 / 216.9 / 172.8 / 79.7%
0.500 / 222.8 / 179.2 / 80.4%
0.550 / 224.3 / 184.0 / 82.0%
0.600 / 225.8 / 187.2 / 82.9%
These numbers are after pocket porting the head. Pocket porting showed up to 4% gain on the intake side, and a pretty significant up to 30% on the exhaust. Notice also the excellent exhaust/intake ratio (EIR).
GM Vortec as Stock, 1.94 Intake/1.50 Exhaust
http://www.kendrick-auto.com/vortec_cs_gm_head.htm
Lift / Intake / Exhaust / EIR
0.050 / 37.6 / 26.3 / 69.9%
0.100 / 68.1 / 51.8 / 76.1%
0.200 / 136.1 / 105.9 / 77.8%
0.300 / 193.1 / 134.8 / 69.8%
0.400 / 222.8 / 144.4 / 64.8%
0.450 / 228.8 / 146.8 / 64.2%
0.500 / 228.8 / 147.6 / 64.5%
0.550 / 225.8 / 149.2 / 66.1%
0.600 / NA / NA / NA
These are purportedly stock Vortec flow figures, before they pocket ported the Vortec as well. (You can also check out the link for figures after the port job, which showed up to 3% gain on the intake and up to 16% gain on the exhaust.)
You can see that with regards to the intake flow, the ported 462 performs very close to the stock Vortec throughout the range of measured valve lifts, and even better than the Vortec at the first two measurement points. On the exhaust the 462 is actually easily outflowing the Vortec, even up to 25% at 0.550 valve lift. :eek:
Based on these figures I decided not to go for the Vortecs, but rather to pocket port my existing heads this winter and use them while saving up bucks for top-of-the-line AFR (http://www.airflowresearch.com) or Pro Topline (http://www.protopline.com/) aluminum heads.
Naturally, this course of action is only tenable if you're willing to do the port job yourself. Having a professional do it would cost enough $$$ to make the Vortecs a better investment. For myself, I've never done any cylinder head porting but am going to tackle it with the help of guide books by David Vizard etc.
(After all, the worst thing that can happen is that I'll ruin these 35-year-old heads and need to get the AFRs sooner :D)
So I say bolt the double humper heads on if they're at all in usable condition. As for the accessories, you can easily mount them using separate accessory brackets (I can take a pic of my setup if you'd like) :cheers:
Best regards,
Arto
:cheers:
But you can do a forum archive search for "alternator bracket" and that should get you started.
E.g. according to the thread at http://forums.corvetteforum.com/zerothread?id=593043 Dynomax makes the bracket you need. It bolts up to the exhaust manifold.
Part no #88301 / GM, Early Style Front Alternator Bracket
http://www.dynomax.com/documents/acc_tools.pdf
http://www.jegs.com/cgi-bin/ncommerc...85&prmenbr=361 $15.99
Hope that helps. There really should be no need to create accessory holes in the heads themselves.
Arto





The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts








