When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Was wonder what the diff is between the two and if using an x-pipe type configutation on the intake side would yeild the same results. I am assuming not but wanted input from the best knowledge base I know. Well now that I have asked myself I'll let you guys try now. :p:
BTW This is sparked by the tpi design on the long tube runners, wondering if an x design would do anything.
I believe that the intake is moving slower than the exhaust. The theory is that the exhaust is using the x-pipe by using each pipe to help pull the exhaust faster from the other pipe and vice-versa. On the intake, you are "pushing" air into the engine and the only way to duplicate that on the intake is either "ram air", turbo, or supercharger.
From: Las Vegas - Just stop perpetuating myths please.
Re: Physics for intake and exhaust (Fevre)
Independent runners on the intake provide the most cylinder filling and least charge dilution. This is how engine builders/tuners can increase volumeteric efficency greater than 1. Independent runners are what make weber carbs so effective. Also allows greater cam overlap/bigger cam with smother idle and better fuel economy. Detroit used for barrels due to cost and seviceability/maintenance.
Exhaust crossovers/X-pipes balance the exhaust pressure and develops better exhaust savaging – to empty the cylinders. There is even more power to develop by matching the idividual cylinders – even accross banks/sides – to maximize savaging.
Most bookstores and usually most libaries will have something to read on this. ;)
Probably. Any truly tuned intake or exhaust system is peaky. The opening and closing of valves generates pressure (sound) waves in the intake and exhaust system that bounce around in various ways. If the the bounces of these waves is timed just right, extra air can be rammed into the cylinder on the intake end or extra air is sucked out on the exhaust end (among other nice effects). The timing will only be right over a narrow rev band if things are fully optimized. Getting an improvement over a wider rpm band will result in smaller gains overall. That is unless you come up with a system for variable length intake runners (BMW has this).
Using these effects to their maximum isn't something I'd worry about though. It takes serious engineering to get it right. Only OEMs or serious racers have the budget for it. Throwing parts at it will gain you a little after a lot of trial and error tuning, but I'm not sure your gains would even be worth all that work.