When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You really ARE trying to up that post count aren't you? ;)
Are those little stars THAT addictive??? :D :D :D
Dep
Alright, alright, I'll try to stop worrying.
For me that has dreamed of a stingray for years and now finally got one, I felt like I wanted to keep it in perfect condition and don't ruin the engine through using wrong fuel. I'm sorry if you think my posting is irrelevant, my question is answered and I will not bother you more about this.
Mike, thank you for your informative post, I start to understand the problematic.
Larsson: That comment you quoted from me was aimed at Fevre...NOT you. You had a legitimate concern and now you can drive the heck out of that Vette without ANY concerns about lead or no-lead :)
Mike: I RESENT lumping Harleys in there with lawn mowers and garbage trucks!!! :mad :nono: :boxing
They are only associated with TRACTORS !!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I agree with what you stated. Good informative post!
Larsson: That comment you quoted from me was aimed at Fevre...NOT you. You had a legitimate concern and now you can drive the heck out of that Vette without ANY concerns about lead or no-lead :)
Mike: I RESENT lumping Harleys in there with lawn mowers and garbage trucks!!! :mad :nono: :boxing
They are only associated with TRACTORS !!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
I agree with what you stated. Good informative post!
Dep
Once again you take what someone has posted and twisted so you can start an arguement. The 1000 miles had nothing to do with whether the eng would be hurt without using a lead substitute, it had more to do with whether that was enough miles driven to justify rebuilding with hardened valve seats. :rolleyes:
You are correct though, a 72 does not need a lead substitute.
BTW I could care less about post count, if I did I would be in OT. :rolleyes:
"Have heard conflicting info on whether an lead additive is really necessary but seeing how you are running only 1000 miles or so a year it couldn't hurt and wouldn't cost much"
"it had more to do with whether that was enough miles driven to justify rebuilding with hardened valve seats"
Well I can't read your mind so I don't KNOW what you MEANT, but the first quote SAYS NOTHING about valve seats and DOES SAY that "you are running only 1000 miles or so a year it couldn't hurt and wouldn't cost much".
Mileage is MEANINGLESS with this problem. The damage is done based on hours run and not miles driven.
The post count was a comment I saw on one of the numerous posts you had input in and stuck in my head. Lighten up dood!! :D Or maybe that post count thing hit a nerve?? :)
Oh yeah...here's one of these things you offered me...think you need it a lot more than I do!!!
In reading all of the post, I couldn't help but jump in. I'll not comment on the leaded/unleaded debate, but having some 27 years in the oil/gas business and some lab experience, I can tell you that, unless you've increased your engine's compression above about 9:1, then good ole 87 is plenty. The mid-grades and premiums will not contribute to any meaningful HP increases. Sometimes older engines, due to carbon buildups, will benefit from a higher octane gas not causing pinging but this is because the carbon buildup has increased it's compression ratio. Unless you're using a higher-than-87 because of pinging or increased compression ratios, save you extra dough for barley pop. :cheers:
marshrat99: I'm not so sure about that statement. I have seen engines from Toyota where the owner's manual said using premium fuel actually INCREASED the performance of the engine. If it was 27 years ago I'd probably agree with you 100%. But this isn't 27 years ago and we have a LOT of variables and electronic gizmos in cars that aid them in running better and running at the maximum efficiency possible. Some engines may not benefit from premium gas...others may. I don't think you can make a blanket statement that ALL of them won't benefit from the higher octane.
I agree with the "start with the lowest" octane logic. I've run 87 octane in my '77 L48 since I've had it with no problems.
"The car was built at the factory to run on unleaded fuel" -- Just curious what your source is for this. Not doubting you, but the only information I could find that stated anything specific about unleaded fuel was for the '71 LS6 (no other engines that year) and everything since '73.
I thought about this issue alot. When I was a kid in the sixtys I had two uncles that had Corvette's. They both used nothing but AMOCO hightest. It was the only fuel at that time that was lead free. Out of all of the cars they used it in they never had an engine failure. Therefore I use Amoco 93 in my Corvette
I think that the 9:1 compression w/ 87 octane was meant for carbureted engines. If you have a knock sensor the computer can advance the timing and get some benefit from 89 or 93 octane. My wiifes LT1 Caprice ran fine on 87 octane-you couldn't make it ping, but even better on the good stuff.
This thread seems to go on forever so I can add some more info:
The engine has higher compression, between 10,5 to 11
We had some friends here that knows atleast something about engines, they said that with a higher compression engine I had to use 98 octane without a doubt, and since it is so old a could use a "booster" (lead addition) if needed.
Everyone here on the forum says so low octanes and everyone in sweden says 98 octane, I wonder if there's a big difference between the fuel in sweden and in America.
This thread seems to go on forever so I can add some more info:
The engine has higher compression, between 10,5 to 11
We had some friends here that knows atleast something about engines, they said that with a higher compression engine I had to use 98 octane without a doubt, and since it is so old a could use a "booster" (lead addition) if needed.
Everyone here on the forum says so low octanes and everyone in sweden says 98 octane, I wonder if there's a big difference between the fuel in sweden and in America.
Larsson: If you have 11-1 then you are looking at racing fuel. Pump gas just isn't gonna cut it for that much compression. Not even pump gas in Europe.
And forget about octane boosters. A complete waste of money. They DON'T raise octane from 98 to 99. The raise it from 98 to 98.1 When they say one point increase THAT'S what they mean. You wouldn't even notice the difference and neither would your engine.