When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Thats the first one. Maybe there's knowledge to be gained from a Poncho system? I wouldn't see why not... Camaro and Firebird were twins, so Chevy and Pontiac had to share stuff once in a while.
I don't know of the article you are looking for. I recall another one about 20 some years ago where a magazine rebuilt a 427 to run on lower octane gas, upped the cam specs, and rebuilt the tri-power to make 450+ gross horse power. I have often kicked myself for losing that article.
Thought this article from Corvette News might still be some help to you. The only major drawback for me with these Holleys is that they don't have changeable jets in the secondaries, only metering plates. From a driving stand point, I have heard others complain that under full throttle they can hang open a little longer than you may want when you lift your foot off the gas.
Unfortunately the Pontiac stuff will be of limited use, since they used Rochester 2 barrels. These are quite the challenge to tune, and they MUST have tight throttle shafts to work properly. It's usually only the center carb thats worn out, and it's due to the linkage/return spring arrangement. If you don't care about originality, move the ruturn spring from underneath where it pulls against the throttle cable (with the shaft as a fulcrum) to up above so it can pull directly against the cable.
I can't remember the magazine that the article was in 20 yrs ago. You may also find some good info on MoPar sites. The six packs used on the Chrysler cars were virtually identical to the Corvette Tri-Powers. ford had a similar arrangement, but the Ford units were mechanical secondaries.
Unfortunately, the Ford design won't work with the Corvette 3x2 manifolds. The required metering block between the main body of the carb and the fuel bowl would make the rear carb too long to fit behind the center carb. The front carb would not be a problem.
I agree! go to the Mopar sites, the 1967 427 3X2 was admired by Chrysler so much that in 1969 trough 1971 the 440 and 340 recieved the same set-ups. The 2300 Holley dosen't care what engine it is on, performance and modifications that work for one will give simular results on another (probrbly not exact but, very close.) I leaned my tri-power trade on a 440 Chrysler, it works on 435HP Vettes with the same results. The Pontiac, Oldsmobile, and 348 Chevy all used Rochester 2bbl carbs (far different animals from the 2300 Holley set-up on the Vette.) JUST DON"T TELL THOSE MOPAR GUYS YOU,RE A VETTE OWNER AND YOU"LL BE FINE! (if you do, they will take out their inferiority complexes on you!) :iagree: