When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Not true. I live in an area where when you start the car in the summer, the water temp gage is reading before you start the engine. Yep, it can be 100 degrees by 10 a.m. and reach 115 by dinner time. With that kind of air temp, the fan clutch is engaged when you turn the motor over to start it. When your trying to keep a motor at 180-200 degrees with air that is well over 110 (not to mention heat soak from the asphalt and the heat of the car in front of you) you can bet that thermal clutch is locked up all the time, idle or highway.
Then I take it that electric fans (if you had them) would also be on 100% of the the time? How could measely little 1/2 HP electric fans keep your car cool, if a 20-30 HP mechanical fan can't?
I've gotten stuck in Houston traffic at well over 100F air temps and my fan clutch only kicks in for a brief period to keep the temp under 200. Once in motion, temps drop back to standard boring 180 where it's supposed to be.
Re: Belt driven fan - what a drag ..... (Mike Ward)
IF the clutch fans are so great how come they are not still used on all vehicles? Elec fans are much more exp and unless there is some great benefit to using an elec fan the auto makers would opt for the chaeper of the two right? I have no direct knowledge that one is better than the other I am just trying to use a little logic.
IF the clutch fans are so great how come they are not still used on all vehicles?
I may be an offshoot of the Front Wheel Drive revolution in the early 80's. It is probably cheaper for auto manufactures to make one type of fan (electric or mechanical) than to produce both types. When FWD came they had to use electric fans to cool the engines and they just carried that over to their RWD lines. Both will use power and this debate is far from over I think. The Car Craft article a few months back really didn't answer the question...at least for me. I run a flex fan rated to 8000 RPM and am happy with its cooling. I used to live in Austin where is also gets hot enough in the summer for you temp gauge to read even if you haven't driven your car in a week and my car always ran below 200 degrees even in traffic.
Re: Belt driven fan - what a drag ..... (theandies)
Mech fans are still used in some trucks.
From an OEM standpoint the biggest advantage an electric fan has is controlability. When it's off.. it's OFF.
When you're going down the highway a fan of any sort is useless. Actually it's worse than useless if it's running, it's an obstruction. Also, why spend energy doing what vehicle speed would do anyway? Sure the gas saved may be trivial but when the EPA is breathing down your neck for making "gas guzzlers" every bit of saving helps.
Noise is also an OEM concern. With an electic fan you don't have to run it until you need it.
I also tend to think (this is just a guess though) that electric fans move more air than a mech at idle. Things like A/C would benefit greatly from extra airflow.
Designer Imagines A Corvette That Looks More Like a Corvette Than the Corvette
Slideshow: A Jaguar designer's personal project imagines what a modern front-engined Corvette might look like if Chevrolet revisited the golden age of the Stingray.