Tool Brand Preference
I have a couple of Proto things and a couple of Snap-On, but Craftsman is what I buy.
I worry about the Craftsman brand now that Kmart is part of the Sears mix, though.







I like the quotes about the different brands.
I read a couple times in this thread that Snap-On tools have a better fit to a bolt and have to question how this is true because half of the error will come from the bolt. Since it's a random and not systematic error (i.e. error from one can be compensated by the other instead of the errors compounding) how does one socket fit better than another consistently?
This is not a rhetorical question. I really am curious.
Thanks!
I might also add the the Snap-On rachets have more teeth so that in a tight spot you can get to the next tooth with less slop. I have had a time when I couldn't get a click with my Craftsman but the Snap-On could get on and finally get a bolt off. Also Snap-On line wrenches are much beefier than Craftsman. Not nearly as likely to round off the nut.


The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





If your company buys from them you can try to get the Co discount.
Proto is now owned/made by Stanley. They were originally a family owned Co. and have survived a series of consolidations and sell offs. At one time they were owned by Ingersol Rand.
Craftsman tools are made for Sears by the lowest bidder. The warrantee is a marketing play as statistically the returns are low enough and their margins high enough that they do not impact profitability. It's not necessarily that the tool is better it's tht most folks will never used them to the point of breakage, and if they do statistically they don't reurn them on warranty. I also believe that thsoe that are returned are debited to the manufacturer.
Snap-on makes great tools as well. They just are very high priced from the trucks. That is due to the truck owner having to carry the credit of the buyer, and the price that he pays from the Co.
OOOps got long winded. In short if you want good tools by Snap-On, Proto or Armstrong, Medium grade Craftsman, Stanley, Cheap not used very often, the import stuff from harbor etc.....
Just my $.02 (again)
Craftsman tools are made for Sears by the lowest bidder. The warrantee is a marketing play as statistically the returns are low enough and their margins high enough that they do not impact profitability. It's not necessarily that the tool is better it's tht most folks will never used them to the point of breakage, and if they do statistically they don't reurn them on warranty. I also believe that thsoe that are returned are debited to the manufacturer.
A counter-example would be say the old Wards PowRKraft - they were brand X tools (often very good stuff incl hot-forged) that were simply restamped "PowR-Kraft" - you could easily tell who made them because they were otherwise visually identical to the maker's own tool lines.
AFAIK the Craftsman mech hand tools are all still made in USA but some Craftsman stuff (power tools?) are starting to be made overseas.
Anybody know anything about the Duralast lifetime tools from autozone? I'm thinking they are imports - anybody know offhand?
I used to buy Husky back in the 70's, and I still have some socket and a 3/8" ratchet that I've had a 3 ft breaker bar on, used as a hammer and dropped in a bilge full of water. But the stuff they're making now is junk. I've broken plenty of craftsman stuff, but I guess it's back to them unless Kobalt is decent.
Toolking

I like the quotes about the different brands.
I read a couple times in this thread that Snap-On tools have a better fit to a bolt and have to question how this is true because half of the error will come from the bolt. Since it's a random and not systematic error (i.e. error from one can be compensated by the other instead of the errors compounding) how does one socket fit better than another consistently?
This is not a rhetorical question. I really am curious.
Thanks!
Just remember, you dont care about those cheapies! They are one use items...
My opinion is that a finer resolution is perhaps important w/ a so-called 'stubby' ratchet but w/ regular length run of the mill ratches probably not all that serious of a consideration. I've got a mint Thorsen USA 1/2" drive w/ a clackety course movement but I'm convinced it's darn near bulletproof too. However I dont' think it's a good choice for tight quarters. Not so much because of it's courser 10 degree movement but the length of the handle.
I'll take the chance on Snap-On being 'weaker" with more teeth, but I think the closer tolerances and materials will more than make up for it.










