C3 Tech/Performance V8 Technical Info, Internal Engine, External Engine, Basic Tech and Maintenance for the C3 Corvette
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

"Vette Motor"...is there REALLY a difference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 11:39 AM
  #21  
stpman's Avatar
stpman
Melting Slicks
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,865
Likes: 1
From: I may be getting old but I refuse to grow up
Default

Originally Posted by Guru_4_hire
The C4 people brought up had the aluminum heads, which were different from the camaro TPI which had iron heads and was only a 305 as compared to the 350 in the vette.
I have an '86 Camaro 350 TPI with iron heads sitting on my shop floor.

Steve
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 01:08 PM
  #22  
C8H18's Avatar
C8H18
Pro
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 649
Likes: 56
From: TX
Default

While on the topic of base engines perhaps someone clear up something...

I think the base 327/300 engine from '66-68 was the L75. Correct or not?

Also what year did the L81 replace the L48? Was it '81?
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 01:15 PM
  #23  
SanDiegoPaul's Avatar
SanDiegoPaul
Race Director
Supporting Lifetime
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,362
Likes: 5
From: San Diego - Deep Within The State of CONFUSION!
Default

Originally Posted by ICEMAN59
I replaced my stock motor on my 80 coupe with a 383 stroker and have been offered some serious money on the original with 55,000 miles on it. I don't get it. It's just a 350 bogged down with smog equiment, but people think because it's a Vette engine it is something special. I'm holding on to all the original parts just because, (you never know) and one day I might be saying boy that was stupid to sell that motor, tranny, hood, etc. Just my $.02 worth
When I built my stroker, I used a 4 bolt main block ... and advertised the OEM L48 including manifolds (intake and exhaust both) in the paper. the first caller not only couldn't WAIT to get down before anyone else, but he paid cash and was happy as a clam.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #24  
stingr69's Avatar
stingr69
Le Mans Master
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,477
Likes: 1,495
From: Little Rock AR
Default

Originally Posted by pgtr
While on the topic of base engines perhaps someone clear up something...

I think the base 327/300 engine from '66-68 was the L75. Correct or not?

Also what year did the L81 replace the L48? Was it '81?
I think the base 327/300 Vette engine for 68 was the L-30

L-81 was 1981 and L-83 was for 1982

The L-48 was the code used in 1967 for the first time in the SS 350 Camaro. The 350 was not available in any other car at that time. The L-48 engine code was used for several years running in that particular application. This engine was also used in the Corvette as a base engine beginning in 69 but it was listed as ZQ-3 "base engine" through 72. In 1973 they started to call it L-48 base engine in the Corvette just like they did for the Camaro optional engine but the Camaro engine was rated at less horespower as compared to the Vette engine. This differences are due to two possible reasons:

1. The Camaro had different exhaust manifolds that were more restrictive
2. Chevy Marketing department wanted it that way.

I would put money on the latter.

-Mark.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #25  
C8H18's Avatar
C8H18
Pro
20 Year Member
Conversation Starter
All Eyes On Me
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 649
Likes: 56
From: TX
Default

Originally Posted by stingr69
I think the base 327/300 Vette engine for 68 was the L-30
I want to say the L30 was the base 327/250 from '63-65 and perhaps in previous years before the 'L' RPO code system. When they went to the 327/300 as the base engine, the optional L75 became the standard/base L75 in 1966 w/ the L30 being dropped from the Corvette. My presumption is the 327/300 L75 continued until 68 and was replaced by the L48 350/300 as the 'new' base engine but I'm not 100% sure on that.

THe problem is a lot of base engines lose their 'L' code identity so it helps to be up on any internal and engineering changes and what not. It's not always accurate to presume that an optional engine w/ the same HP on another Chevrolet is necessarily the same L code engine as a base Corvette. Especially back in the 60s when they were making so dang many permutations.

Originally Posted by stingr69
L-81 was 1981 and L-83 was for 1982
Ah yes, the one year wonder L81 and the two (production) year wonder L83!

Originally Posted by stingr69
The L-48 was the code used in 1967 for the first time in the SS 350 Camaro. The 350 was not available in any other car at that time. The L-48 engine code was used for several years running in that particular application. This engine was also used in the Corvette as a base engine beginning in 69 but it was listed as ZQ-3 "base engine" through 72. In 1973 they started to call it L-48 base engine in the Corvette just like they did for the Camaro optional engine but the Camaro engine was rated at less horespower as compared to the Vette engine. This differences are due to two possible reasons:
Thanks. By '69-'72 lots of Chevrolet passenger cars had the L48 on their option list. Monte Carlo for example comes to mind. The ZQ3 thing is some weird factory build code thing they used for a few years and replaced w/ the L48. Somone that was an authority on obscure build sheet codes (John Hinckley?) explained all this about build sheet codes a few weeks back in regards to the L48 when someone else mistakenly said the L48 started in 73 on vettes. Try searching in this forum on 'L48' and 'obscure' and you should find the thread - You might find his post interesting.

Who knows what game they were playing - in other years, the rams horns vs log roll manifolds never stopped Chevy from using the L48 (or other) designation 'L' - that and the tack drive distributor and chrome ignition covers were different from 'other' L48s in '69-'72 but inside it's all pure L48.

Last edited by C8H18; Dec 1, 2004 at 07:50 PM.
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 PM.

story-0
8 Most "Only Corvette Owners Understand" Quirks and Problems

Slideshow: These are the quirks, annoyances, and oddly lovable problems that every Corvette owner eventually learns to live with.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-28 09:31:39


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Reasons the C6 Z06 is Still A Performance Benchmark After 20 Years

Slideshow: 10 reasons why the C6 Z06 is still a performance benchmark after 20 years.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 17:20:09


VIEW MORE
story-2
How Much Horsepower Every Corvette Engine "LOST" in 1972

Slideshow: How much horsepower every Corvette engine lost in 1972.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:54:53


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 DOs and DON'Ts for Protecting Your Convertible Top!

Slideshow: How to Protect A Convertible Top: 10 DOs & DON'Ts

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-03 00:00:00


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Explosive Corvettes Ever Made: Power-to-Weight Ratio Ranked!

Slideshow: The 10 most explosive Corvettes ever built based on power-to-weight ratio.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-20 07:23:03


VIEW MORE
story-5
150 hp to 1,250 hp: Every Corvette Generation Compared by the Specs That Matter

Slideshow: From C1 to C8 we compare every Corvette generation by the numbers.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 16:54:12


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Coolest Corvette Pace Cars (and Replicas) of All Time

Slideshow: Some Corvette pace cars became collectible legends, while others perfectly captured the look and attitude of their era.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-11 09:50:51


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Corvette Engines RANKED by Peak Torque (70+ Years of Muscle!)

Slideshow: Ranking the top 10 Corvette engines by torque output.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:58:09


VIEW MORE
story-8
Corvette ZR1X Will Be Pacing the Indy 500, And Could Probably Race, Too!

Slideshow: A Corvette pace car nearly matching IndyCar speeds sounds exaggerated, until you look at the numbers.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-04 20:03:36


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Corvettes Coming to Mecum Indy 2026!

Among a rather large group of them.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:56:44


VIEW MORE