Hydrogen Corvette
http://www.unitednuclear.com/h2.htm
Scroll down toward the bottom and check it out.
No more Dino Fuel???
ahhh, imagine a world where bogus and Nathan do not have to duke it out in catalytic converter threads!

i would love to see more technologies replace the IC engine from an engineering standpoint, but IMO having an infrastructure and industry to support hydrogen powered passenger vehicles is still way way off.
my personal prediction is we will see hybrid powertrains (running on gas or diesel) in performance vehicles (imagine full torque at 0 RPM) before fuel-celled electric vehicles. the only thing hybrids need today are better battery technology, while hydrogen-power has many more technical, political, and economic issues to resolve. (the latter 2 issues will stop any great idea in its tracks.)
What do you think? Anyone?

Everyone complains about the oil companies. But do you know what they have which is valuable. Not oil....DISTRIBUTION.. The nature of the fuel is irrelivent when you have an outlet to sell it on every corner already in place.
I like this concept and hope it's more than just smoke.
It's a home refueling pump for compressing natural gas. Runs off your existing gas supply to your house. Gas is equivalent $1.20/gal.
They say it's actually safer to have the CNG in the tanks than it is to carry around dino gas in your standard tank.....
The CNG is rated over 100 octane. Almost no pollution. Motors last a lot longer. oil stays a lot cleaner, longer.
How long ago was it that gas tanks were no longer permitted behind the driver's seat but needed to be outside of the vehicle.
Now if they had replaced the fuel tank or spare carrier with those (or some kind of) containers it would be a real innovation.
Natural gas may now be cheaper than gasoline but if we really start to use it in our cars the Gov. will be all over it for tax revenues and the price will shoot up too. The same is true of any energy form that we come with.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts
...but i too would not want to drive in rush hour traffic on the interstate with a bomb behind my head.
flylowguy, i also think CNG is a great low-range alternative. Crown Vics have a factory option for CNG, so i imagine the mods to get it to run on the stuff is not too extensive. taxis and buses all over the world have been using it for years.
...but i too would not want to drive in rush hour traffic on the interstate with a bomb behind my head.
flylowguy, i also think CNG is a great low-range alternative. Crown Vics have a factory option for CNG, so i imagine the mods to get it to run on the stuff is not too extensive. taxis and buses all over the world have been using it for years.
I seem to remember that GMC had it as an option for some of their trucks as well back mid 80s
Im all for hybrids, the technology is there...but oh how we are stuck on our fossil fuels ....SIGH !!
snoopdan
Hydrogen cars are over rated. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It takes energy (usually Electrolysis) to split the hydrogen and oxygen atoms of water. If fossil fuels are used to produce the electricity needed then there are no real advantages to not using the fossil fuels in the first place. If you calculate the price of how much electricity it uses to get the hydrogen, hydrogen is actually more expensive then gasoline (not to mention the cost of the equipment). Even in the best tanks hydrogen evaporates at 1.7% per day. Hydrogen is combustible, odorless and colorless and in its liquid form is cold enough to freeze air. That’s not something I want with me in my car.***Do this at your own risk! im not resonsible if you blow up your self, your property, your dog, or anything***
I remember doing this experiment in school. If you all want to do the experiment: take a non-metal bucket filled with water. put salt in it. completely submerge 2 shot glass upside-down under the water. Make sure water completely fills them and there is no air in them. Take some wire and put one under each glass. Connect the other end to a battery. The one that fills with air twice as fast is oxygen and the other will be hydrogen (H2O one H to every 2 O). In one motion lift and move the glass (still upside-down) over a candle. That nice size flame you’ll see and pop you'll hear is a very small amount of uncompressed hydrogen. Now imagine what those tanks would do with an ignition source.
Everyone complains about the oil companies. But do you know what they have which is valuable. Not oil....DISTRIBUTION.. The nature of the fuel is irrelivent when you have an outlet to sell it on every corner already in place.
I like this concept and hope it's more than just smoke.
But something for nothing? Toyota says Hydro electric cars are 25 years off.Distribution is the key and the oil companies have it.
Most likely hydro electric cars will be spliting hydro carbons. The oil companies will still have the edge.
Hydrogen cars are over rated. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It takes energy (usually Electrolysis) to split the hydrogen and oxygen atoms of water. If fossil fuels are used to produce the electricity needed then there are no real advantages to not using the fossil fuels in the first place. If you calculate the price of how much electricity it uses to get the hydrogen, hydrogen is actually more expensive then gasoline (not to mention the cost of the equipment). Even in the best tanks hydrogen evaporates at 1.7% per day. Hydrogen is combustible, odorless and colorless and in its liquid form is cold enough to freeze air. That’s not something I want with me in my car.***Do this at your own risk! im not resonsible if you blow up your self, your property, your dog, or anything***
I remember doing this experiment in school. If you all want to do the experiment: take a non-metal bucket filled with water. put salt in it. completely submerge 2 shot glass upside-down under the water. Make sure water completely fills them and there is no air in them. Take some wire and put one under each glass. Connect the other end to a battery. The one that fills with air twice as fast is oxygen and the other will be hydrogen (H2O one H to every 2 O). In one motion lift and move the glass (still upside-down) over a candle. That nice size flame you’ll see and pop you'll hear is a very small amount of uncompressed hydrogen. Now imagine what those tanks would do with an ignition source.
It looks like you'll need a PhD to repair a hydro electric car.I see a diesel TDI in just about everyones future.
The Germans starved of oil during WW2 built diesels that ran on coal dust. Imagine the impact of engines running on coal dust?
Hydrogen is a long shot, but who knows?
Hydrogen cars are over rated. Energy is neither created nor destroyed. It takes energy (usually Electrolysis) to split the hydrogen and oxygen atoms of water. If fossil fuels are used to produce the electricity needed then there are no real advantages to not using the fossil fuels in the first place. If you calculate the price of how much electricity it uses to get the hydrogen, hydrogen is actually more expensive then gasoline (not to mention the cost of the equipment)....as for the durability of the tanks, some have been developed by industry and academia that withstand quite a beating. probably more than Crown Vic fuel tanks.
but they are expensive - today.Toyota, Ford, and Honda have their hands full trying to build up enough technicians to service these things.
i echo redwing's comments on distribution. unless the oil companies see that they can make gobs of money selling hydrogen, they are not going to do this. in other semi-socialist countries around the world (i.e. pretty much every other country in the world) if cost is the only issue, the government tries to figure out some subsidized way to make it happen if the overall impact on the country is positive. companies won't make out like thieves but they will not go broke (at the citizen's expense, though). we'll see what happens here, but i will not hold my breath.
diesel TDI - i'm all for that too. i think it would be slick to get full torque at 1500 RPM. but in this case the EPA and CARB has to get their head out of their **** cavity to make compromises in emissions laws to allow this. the oil companies too have to shell out the extra bucks (and pass them onto us) to offer better refined low-sulfur diesel and have it available at evey corner. as for the low demand for diesels here, if we can get the marketing companies making the viagra commercials to do the sell job, that should not be a problem.







What does that gas consist of? Is there a way to bottle and compress it? I'll bet most military barracks and locker rooms could supply a goodly amount!
(And some say the Corvette C4 Forum is NOT educational!
)
What does that gas consist of? Is there a way to bottle and compress it? I'll bet most military barracks and locker rooms could supply a goodly amount!
(And some say the Corvette C4 Forum is NOT educational!
)












