Why does the C4 IRS suck
I have been surfing the F-body boards for a few years. I have notice that mods seem to provide F-BODIES a bigger gain than on the Y-BODIES. On the A4s the only major drivetrain difference is the independent rear suspension. What really causes this difference, is it overly optimistic F-body owners?
I am just looking for the real scoop.
Mike










This can be minimized somewhat with the proper tweaking in set-up and geometry though. Check with the folks in the drag race section, they ought to have some good ideas. Beam plates will help, modified camber brackets, shocks, etc.





Last edited by aboatguy; Aug 7, 2005 at 07:06 PM.





Fish-tailing is impressive but does nothing for improving performance results.
The Best of Corvette for Corvette Enthusiasts





The main problem with drag launches is keeping both tires straight up and down, so the tire contact patch is even. The antiquated live axle excels at this (the only thing it does excel at, except maybe cost), whereas the IRS is best for handling and ride.
I'll take the trade-off any ol' day.
Larry
code5coupe
Larry
code5coupe





inertia and geometry










Who says that they do??
Larry
code5coupe





Sounds like the original question is this: will the same modification (K&N, say) gain more on an LT1 Camaro than on an LT1 Corvette?
Perhaps it will, since the Camaro is usually rated less to begin with.
That said....I can only ask another question: so what?
Larry
code5coupe
Sounds like the original question is this: will the same modification (K&N, say) gain more on an LT1 Camaro than on an LT1 Corvette?
Perhaps it will, since the Camaro is usually rated less to begin with.
That said....I can only ask another question: so what?
Larry
code5coupe
Indeed my 3rd gen Camaro is about 300lbs heavier than my C4 so, with the same drive line, the C4 will launch harder..it's the physics not the IRS.
marketing ploy? wow thats a new one.
so the f-body lt-1 engines are the same as the corvette lt-1 engine?
i thought the vette motors were better from the oil pan up.4 bolt mains,different crank number,different rods,different pistons,different cam,different heads and so on and so on.
so your saying the actual gm part #s for the above mentioned parts are the same betweem f-bodys and y-bodys?
got me wondering now.seriously.
an arcticle i read on the new mustang gt's stated they considered irs for it but opted for the straight axle for 2 reasons,1 being less parasitic draw from straight line acceleration and 2 (and mainly) being cost.
of all the cars ive owned over the years (im 48)ive never had one that hooks up (stock) like the vette does.the suspension just squats and hooks.
how many basically stock cars do you see picking up the front tire?(check some of mojo's shots)
it may cost a few ponies but i say add some elsewhere and enjoy the bennys of the irs.







