When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
What do you guys think im in a jam between an lt1 and a grand national i love the corvette c4's tho. Im familar with the lt1 previous z28 owner everything is preety much the same ? How are the c4 vette a4's 1/4 and 0-60 comparable with a grand national any help is greatly appreciated
expect a LT1 to do the 1/4 in the mid 13s. 0-60 in the mid-5's.
power is found the the GN, but they don't handle worth ****. besides, the GN is faster but much more collectable. So why mess up a real potential collectable?
A GN will kill an LT1 in straight line acceleration.
If you're referring to a stock 87 Grand National, it is listed to run the quarter in 14.23 seconds @ 98 mph. The GNX runs the quarter in 13.43 seconds @ 103 mph. I'd say an LT1 could run with either of them.
Which one is easier to mod? We at the forum know it's easy to make a LT1 scream, just takes money and time. Why would you ask us at this forum which one to buy?
The Grand National is an old school clunker. I think that body debuted in 82-or 83 and would have died unremembered if not for the powertrain. A low miler that is in perfect shape and sits in your garage will probably hold it's value but unless things have changed in the last couple of years nobody is throwing big money at them. Bone stock, as noted above, they are not that quick. The GNX is both much faster and much more collectable, but much more expensive too.
I think dollar for dollar, assuming the GN is in solid mechanical shape, it is cheaper to make go fast than an LT1 car. Close to a 12.0 flat on the stock turbos is doable. Check dragtimes.com. If your dream is a street racer then the Buick is the one. But they have that shoe box styling and primitive interior so as a looker, a handler, and a car that can be nudged into the high 12s without much work, the Corvette makes more sense. The GNs are a relatively rare vehicle but only car guys recognize them anymore. The GNX is a special car, but not cheap and you probably won't be driving your modified 11 second car to work on the nice summer days like you will your LT1 targa.
I had a GN for 5 1/2 years.Stock for stock,the vette will out do it in any catagory.But start modding,and it dont take much to get the buick going.I had mine going 11.5x's with bolt ons,but it sure wasnt a vette.
If you're referring to a stock 87 Grand National, it is listed to run the quarter in 14.23 seconds @ 98 mph. The GNX runs the quarter in 13.43 seconds @ 103 mph. I'd say an LT1 could run with either of them.
My 87 GN bone stock ran 13.90's at 99MPH on street tires in 90 degree Florida heat when I bought it in 1987 (new). Eventually with nothing more than a K&N air filter, Flowmaster replacement muffler and a little fiddling with the wastegate, I had it running mid 12's without as much as popping the valve covers off of it...ran it like this for 90,000 miles before it was stolen out of my driveway after 8 years of ownership.
Handling, on the other hand.... typical G-body marshmallow suspension.
Much as I loved that car, I wouldn't have another one, unless it was a garage queen (not likely)
From: SCMR Rat Pack'r Charter Member..Great Bend KS
Stock vs. stock, an LT1 C4 will be quicker, stop better, handle better, ride better, have a higher top speed, and look cooler than a stock Buick Grand National.
It won't, however, hold it's value better.
A GN will kill an LT1 in straight line acceleration.
STOCK it will not, the problem is the GN is a turbo car and can be made to spank the Corvette for very little cash. I have seen them go mid 12's with free mods.
The GNX runs the quarter in 13.43 seconds @ 103 mph. I'd say an LT1 could run with either of them.
Don't always believe everything you read. Ive seen a video of a stock GNX besting an 87 Callaway TT from Automobile mag circa 1987.
I always thought the GN was a mid 13 sec car out of the box. I guess I could be wrong but I don't think mid 14's is it either. They put that same motor in a TA and Im pretty sure it was a 13.8-9 car stock.
Last edited by SurfnSun; Jun 19, 2007 at 10:37 AM.
Gene Deputy had a shop down the street from me called Texas Turbo. He was one of the fastest Mustangs back in the day. He always told me no two GN's are alike. Stock, some were extremely fast and some were slow. Maybe it was in the assembly, maybe it was in the tuning. Conleys on the other side of town, made some screamers out of Buicks though. The guy who designed the GN went over to the Vette devision and used to say the GN stock was faster initially but keep you foot in it and the Vette will win.
Gene Deputy had a shop down the street from me called Texas Turbo. He was one of the fastest Mustangs back in the day. He always told me no two GN's are alike. Stock, some were extremely fast and some were slow. Maybe it was in the assembly, maybe it was in the tuning. Conleys on the other side of town, made some screamers out of Buicks though. The guy who designed the GN went over to the Vette devision and used to say the GN stock was faster initially but keep you foot in it and the Vette will win.
That's because the GN was speed limited to 124MPH from the factory. GM did that because of the tires they put on the GN (non Z rated), or so they said at the time.
The FBI at the time (1987) commissioned GM to supply them with 500 GNs without the speed governor (it was in the PROM anyway), and the result was the GN was capable of 150MPH top-end speed, which was about the same as a Corvette. Whether or not you wanted to actually DRIVE a G-body that fast was another matter!
My particular GN would pull like a freight train all the way up to 124MPH, and when it hit the speed limiter, it felt like an anchor was dropped out the back...it felt like it had a lot more left in it.
As far as tuners... Deputy has made some fast ones, but most people associate stupid fast turbo Buicks with Ken Duttweiler (some of the cars that came from his shop were positively sick!).
Last edited by RacerX70CC; Jun 19, 2007 at 09:06 AM.