When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a first gen SBC built to around 400 bhp. I also have an m21 close ratio which I may or may not choose to use. I have been trying to figure out the "best" car for my engine. I am aware that "best" is very subjective, but I am looking for a car where the install will be relatively quick and simple. I have considered the following three possibilities. Please feel free to propose others. The car must be a manual shift.
1)1985-1992 C4
2)Third gen F-body (weak T5 and diff)
3)1983-1987 442 (I know the chassis s*cks, but they are full frame and I have always liked the appearance of these cars. But again, sh*tty brakes, suspension, etc. At least they have an 8.5" diff. Probably more work for the swap.)
I can spend upto $10k, and I guess I have somewhat decided on a C4. I have seen a few in Autotrader that seem decent. I don't need a show car. My question is, if I get a C4 with the L98 engine, would I gain alot, performance wise, by swapping in my engine?
p.s. sorry about my "simple" profile, still working on it.
L98s have around 250hp and 350 ftlb of tq stock. So yes, 400hp and, I'm assuming similar torque numbers, would be a nice improvement. Since you'll be replacing the engine/tranny anyway, you can probably find an early C4 for $5k or so. Maybe even less if you can find one without engine/tranny at all.
L98s have around 250hp and 350 ftlb of tq stock. So yes, 400hp and, I'm assuming similar torque numbers, would be a nice improvement. Since you'll be replacing the engine/tranny anyway, you can probably find an early C4 for $5k or so. Maybe even less if you can find one without engine/tranny at all.
I was thinking of just swapping the engine and leaving in the 4+3 or ZF6(nice to have an overdrive). Could these trannys handle the bhp/torque of my engine? Of course, the 400bhp is probably equivalent to, I'm guessing, 300 net hp.
Also, I believe that from 1987 on, the L98 came with a one piece rear seal, which has a different bolt pattern on the crank for the flywheel. Does this mean I would be limited to an 1984-1986, or could I just change the flywheel on a later (1987 and newer) C4? Isn't the 1 piece rear seal engine externally balanced vs the internally balanced 2 piece rear seal engine?
I was thinking of just swapping the engine and leaving in the 4+3 or ZF6(nice to have an overdrive). Could these trannys handle the bhp/torque of my engine? Of course, the 400bhp is probably equivalent to, I'm guessing, 300 net hp.
Also, I believe that from 1987 on, the L98 came with a one piece rear seal, which has a different bolt pattern on the crank for the flywheel. Does this mean I would be limited to an 1984-1986, or could I just change the flywheel on a later (1987 and newer) C4? Isn't the 1 piece rear seal engine externally balanced vs the internally balanced 2 piece rear seal engine?
I just read that both 1 piece and 2 piece rear main seal are actually internally (or externally) balanced and the reason there is extra weight on the flywheel of the 1 piece rear main seal type engine is because of the material that was removed from the earlier's engine crank hub.
So I guess if I get the earlier's C4 flywheel (1984-1986), bolt it to my gen I SBC, I could potentially install it into a post 1986 C4. Would a 1987-1991 clutch and pressure plate bolt on to the pre 1987 flywheel?
Ask Tom at Carolina Clutch.. he will know and has a ton of different styles avaliable.
Are you keeping fuel injection? what are the particulars in the engine (to make sure its computer compatible)? Cam? heads have accessory holes in the front of them? (Old camel hump type heads wont work)
I have a first gen SBC built to around 400 bhp. I also have an m21 close ratio which I may or may not choose to use. I have been trying to figure out the "best" car for my engine. I am aware that "best" is very subjective, but I am looking for a car where the install will be relatively quick and simple. I have considered the following three possibilities. Please feel free to propose others. The car must be a manual shift.
1)1985-1992 C4
2)Third gen F-body (weak T5 and diff)
3)1983-1987 442 (I know the chassis s*cks, but they are full frame and I have always liked the appearance of these cars. But again, sh*tty brakes, suspension, etc. At least they have an 8.5" diff. Probably more work for the swap.)
I can spend upto $10k, and I guess I have somewhat decided on a C4. I have seen a few in Autotrader that seem decent. I don't need a show car. My question is, if I get a C4 with the L98 engine, would I gain alot, performance wise, by swapping in my engine?
p.s. sorry about my "simple" profile, still working on it.
The biggest issues/questions that you'll need to answer is fitment. Both the vette and later F-bodies will have clearance issues with certain intakes...measure wisely.
Additionally, the transmission for the vette do not bolt up using a cross member as other cars...so the M21 will be a $custom$ fit. If you come up with a tranny swap take plenty pictures and measurements so the forum can take advantage of your trail-blazin'
400HP isn't really that big of a deal once you consider the TPI intakes is worth -100 HP on TPI motors. Any decent Cam/valve train package will net the 400HP.
...so my suggestion is to go cool and go 442!
...If you are stuck on the vette, I'd go with a very high mile 90-91 or a C4 that needs a engine rebuild at a reduced cost. In the end you'll find that the long-block is a small percentage of $ and time for the corvette project.
Ask Tom at Carolina Clutch.. he will know and has a ton of different styles avaliable.
Are you keeping fuel injection? what are the particulars in the engine (to make sure its computer compatible)? Cam? heads have accessory holes in the front of them? (Old camel hump type heads wont work)
You bring up a good point. My engine is carburated. How difficult would it be to adapt it to a fuel injected vehicule. Would it screw up the computer? What about the fuel tank/pump? I suppose the FI is high pressure vs a low pressure carb setup. The heads have holes in them for the accesories.